DEMONLAND PLAYER OF THE YEAR - Round 8

[Demonland 70,547]

Please try hard to find some players to give your votes to – voting starts on the final bell or whenever you smash your tv.

Votes to be given on a 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 basis

[P-man 13,366]

Another week of racking the brain coming up.

[deeflog 679]

no one is deserving of votes after this

[Wadda We Sing 10,685]

Is this a trick question?

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

Yeah well maybe there was possibly one or two....nah forget it!

The side just sucks you dry.

We should suspend the voting after pizzpoor efforts like that.

[red and blue forever 944]

5 Jones

4 blease

3 magner

2 garland

1 watts

best I can do.

not easy this week

[P-man 13,366]

Yeah stuff the votes this week.

[RedLegs23 891]

6 - Jones

5 - Watts

4 - Blease

3 - _____

2 - Grimes

1 - Rivers

[stuie 7,374]

6 - Us supporters and members for being the only passionate people involved with this team

5-

4 -

3 -

2 -

1 - Watts (purely for putting up with all the shite he cops)

[Nasher 33,607]

Well done Watts and Blease.

[hardtack 10,434]

6 Jones

5 Watts

4 Magner

3 Blease

No one else

[Nasher 33,607]

6. Sylvia

5. Moloney

4. Davey

3. Jamar

2. Howe

1. Morton

[Wadda We Sing 10,685]

6. Jones

5. Clark

4. Magner

3. Blease

2. Rivers

1. Ground Staff

[Lil_red_fire_engine 10,902]

6. Jones

5. Blease

4. Watts

[The Great One 99 125]

6. Watts

5. Rivers

4. Blease

3. Jones

2. Jurrah

1. Howe, only because of the 1 highlight

-6 to Colin Sylvia. I cannot describe how dissapointed I am with this bloke.

[deeflog 679]

no votes for me this week

[Deeoldfart 7,999]

6. Watts

5. Blease

4. Jones

3. *

2. *

1. *

* I would have given 3, 2 and 1 if somebody else had worked hard, or put their head over the ball a couple of times. Sadly, no takers!

[mrtwister 652]

6 - Watts

5 - Rivers

4 - Blease

3 - Bartram

2 - McDonald

1 - Jones

[BIG JIM 508]

Jack watts 6 well done mate very proud

[Nasher 33,607]

Now that I've had a bath, a stiff drink and a wind down:

6 - Watts. Don't care if people think he had an easy role; he took marks and used the ball well. 34 touches is a good effort no matter what. How about a midfield role?

5 - Jones. Has stepped it up a level this year. Grateful that we've got him at the moment.

4 - Blease. Showed everything we'd hoped. Got plenty of the ball, used it well, used his pace to good effect and seemed to last the match out. He was one of the very few true positives to take away from the game.

3 - Rivers. Thought he was the best of the talls in the back line. 71 inside 50s to our 35 - holy moly. I don't think we appreciate enough how under the pump these guys are. I reckon all of our defenders are being made to look much worse than they are because they are under the pump all the time.

2 - Magner. Tackling machine. Would like to see him get more of the ball ala his first few games; don't know what role he's being asked to play though.

1 - Garland. I struggled immensely with this last one - just thought he looked okay where many didn't. Might've also gone McKenzie for nothing else other than effort.

[Striker475 696]

6. Watts

5. Jones

4. Blease

3. Magner

2. Garland

1. Howe (only because that mark was a ripper)

[Nasher 33,607]

Those who have given Howe a 1 are generous. The mark was a 10/10 no doubt (how about the hang time!?), but the rest of his game was complete garbage other than that, including the 5 seconds after the mark.

[Striker475 696]

Those who have given Howe a 1 are generous. The mark was a 10/10 no doubt (how about the hang time!?), but the rest of his game was complete garbage other than that, including the 5 seconds after the mark.

The only reason he's getting one is for the mark, it was a [censored] to do beyond the 4 votes.

[angrydee 842]

6 Watts

5 Jones

4 Blease

[QueenC 74]

6. Watts

5. Jones

4. Blease

3. Grimes

2. Rivers

1. Garland