Jump to content

Featured Replies

11 hours ago, Pates said:

This is a little side note to this thread but the clubs really need to come together to create a proper second tier competition where they match each week to the calendar. These weeks where Casey has a bye while we play is awful for player development and management. The league has enough money in the coffers, they should be making it a high priority.

I think JVR will get the call up for Petty, if Fox Footy succeed in getting Melk suspended (and I just have this nagging feeling it'll happen) I say we bring in Howes to cover Disco who stays forward. If Oliver is available Sharp can play a full Casey game and give the sub vest to either Kolt or Spargo.

They just talked and talked the Melksham bump up as much as they could. It always then gets a reaction from the [censored] Christensen .

I thought Melksham was our best forward last night.

I'd bet money he'll get a week now.

 

Here's a lil tip for the Dees.

When we have momentum kick goals. Because you can be sure that momentum will shift at some stage.

No charge for the tip.

 

Although May had a couple of good moments it’s really time to start getting games into Adams.

Keen for the swap sooner rather than later.

Very difficult selection this week because the question marks are on Oliver (big unknown) and Fritsch so it's players the coaches clearly have a lot of time for.

I'm going to assume Clarry is right to go, in which case Rivers stays back, Turner stays forward. I'd have Disco in the Fritsch role, who gets demoted to sub. Send Sharp back to Casey for a full game.

Then for the Petty replacement it's a choice of AJ and JVR. I don't have a big preference but I probably lean AJ for his tackling and better mobility across half forward if Disco is the deeper target.

Kolt certainly attempted to get himself dropped but I think his physicality and positioning is just a clear edge to Sharp even if he stuffed up most of what he did against the Eagles. Put that down to some nerves playing at home, trying to do too much.


It's a big game for us isn't it?

Another sudden death game and the players will know that any slip up means we could finish the season mid table (at best)

The Hawks are decent but they are not that good. They are certainly beatable

So the pressure is on and we just have to start well. We'd be in a better position if Clarrie was to step back in so let's hope that his break is a short one

AJ or JVR to come in for Petty

If Oliver is good to go then Sharp could make way (although Sharp does add a bit of pace up forward and isn't the worst of the back-ups)

Sub to be strategic? Someone who can come on and impact straight away

Could be worse as our season is still alive and at worst, we can play spoiler anyway

We’ve beaten the Eagles, Richmond and Fremantle, definitely not counting my gherkins. We’ve shown that we consistently crumble under any type of pressure, and we know that Hawthorn will bring that. Not confident but happy to be proven wrong.

12 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

We’ve beaten the Eagles, Richmond and Fremantle, definitely not counting my gherkins. We’ve shown that we consistently crumble under any type of pressure, and we know that Hawthorn will bring that. Not confident but happy to be proven wrong.

Conversely, if Hawthorn beat Richmond today, they will have beaten 5 of the bottom 8 sides, with their only other win coming in Tasmania against the 8th placed GWS.

And lost to PA and Geelong.

 
14 hours ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Hawks have only beaten 1 top 8 team and that was in Tassie. They are on fraud watch for mine. This is absolutely a winnable game. They also haven't beaten us since 2018.

Phewwww... was worried about this game. All good , we've not a worry , what with being a top 8 team and all 🤔🙄

Let's not get too carried away having only accounted for the Toiges and the West.

Good to see us playing better. Very good to see us stay awake in the 4th !!

A fraud!! Lofty suspicions there.... and we're ridgy didge ???

Hopefully account for ourselves competently. Hopefully Milky is on the park.

Crossed fingers and toes 🤞

Edited by beelzebub


Hawks play with Chol as the only tall. plus Gunston so we don’t want to go tall

T mac and May back and Turner stays fwd

Petty out JVR/AJ

The young Tigers played the Hawks well that Q

Goody will be taking notes. I reckon the Hawks are getting figured out somewhat this season but will still be top 8

If we beat them it would be huge

2 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Phewwww... was worried about this game. All good , we've not a worry , what with being a top 8 team and all 🤔🙄

Let's not get too carried away having only accounted for the Toiges and the West.

Good to see us playing better. Very good to see us stay awake in the 4th !!

A fraud!! Lofty suspicions there.... and we're ridgy didge ???

Hopefully account for ourselves competently. Hopefully Milky is on the park.

Crossed fingers and toes 🤞

We’re clearly not as good as Hawthorn. Doubt anyone is silly enough to suggest otherwise.

But we do have a win over Fremantle, who have been good enough to beat the Dogs and Adelaide.

That’s about the same level of quality as Hawthorn’s best win, which was vs GWS.

FWIW I think we lose on Saturday, but if we bring our best pressure and contest work I’m confident we can stay in this game to the end.

Interesting that GWS losing streak has coincided with Strigger coming in - remarkable what a small tweak can do to a teams balance. We need to be careful We don't do the same with our forward setip.

So I'd keep the forward line the same as howwe finished the game. We are far more potent with the small setup. JvR, Fritsch, Melks together doesn't offer the required pressure and none of them play as a lead up forward.

Hawks rely on a lot of run, so I'd replace Petty with a midfielder or flanker; perhaps Woewodin who can be both.

Can Adams ruck?

Like the idea of Fritsch as sub.

Steely Green and Jaunty Fuall

What is this a Mills and Boon novel?


Dropping Oliver is not a bad idea, that will determine if he is really interested in playing for the the Dees. Would trading him be a benefit to him regarding his mental state?

Petty out, JVR in.

We should beat them at the stoppages, and pressure their ball carriers.

Cover their half back line who run and carry (so our half forwards must run hard both ways for 4 quarters) .

Turner plays on Sicily to keep him accountable.

I know the Hawks look like the Harlem Globe Trotters against the Tiges, but I think now that we have found our contest (we've been running the pressure factor ~200 for weeks now). We will be a very different proposition. Will Day is a massive loss for them and I can't help but feel sad for the young bloke remembering Trengove, and the drama Viney had getting back (We/He were so lucky), any way with Day out and Sicily finding his clown hat again we are a red hot chance.

Our kryptonite is still confidence shooting for goal, I haven't seen anyone else talk about it but Trac looks like he is visibly panicking when he is taking a set shot, Gawn not far behind. This needs coaching damn quick and is unacceptable because I think Trac is avoiding shots he should be taking. And I think if the leaders are nervous it can be a cancer for other players. If we bag a few early I feel like we are likely, but a repeat of our 1st quarter shanks will see the game gone.

I want Duke on the wing or midfield, I understand the desire to turn him into a rebounding weapon, but he's not there yet. McVee had a super solid win in a 3 v1 situation, he's coming good. Rivers had a much better game and almost convinced me that the midfield is his thing but I would keep him back against the hawks. Bowey/Salem, I think will get torched by Watson/Ginnivan so not sure how we play those guys. If windsor has the defensive ability I would sacrifice his offensive run (even though I'm contradicting myself about moving him forward, but I think defending Hawthorns smalls is the game, as I reckon we'll have enough entry to kick a winning score.

Hnmm anyone else get vibes that Clayton wants out from MFC as reported ch 9??

7 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

How about the AFL come out and explain why this wasn’t paid the mark FFS.


7 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Hnmm anyone else get vibes that Clayton wants out from MFC as reported ch 9??

Have no idea.

That said I can't see him just popping back in for the Sqawkers...and that understandable.

It's a vexed posit with Clarry. He needs footy...but does he need us...and conversely do we need him.

That's not slighting anyone. It's just putting the position up the flagpole.

Wish him well.

I'm a Melbourne supporter.

Life goes on.

13 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Hnmm anyone else get vibes that Clayton wants out from MFC as reported ch 9??

What did they say PF?

 
5 minutes ago, adonski said:

What did they say PF?

Said that despite all the work with the club is keen to look elsewhere next year

2 minutes ago, SPC said:

Said that despite all the work with the club is keen to look elsewhere next year

How exhausting


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 187 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies