Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

They could make a set that represents Clazza’s goal in the 21 GF!

Lots of smiley faced MFC players and sad faced Doggies!!!

With a James Bradshaw figure shouting, “Bang! Bang, bang, bang!”

We are certainly starting to building something at DemonLand

 
2 hours ago, bush demon said:

Surely this initiative  would present excellent cost-saving opportunities for our new Admin centre at Caulfield...

A Lego replica might be the closest thing to a new training facility / club hq that we ever get.

Members can have their own Lego avitar go hang out in the Lego social club.

I'm sure the players would rather use it than go out to Casey too!

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

Naming rights sponsor sorted for the new training base im Caulfield...

Legoland 


2 hours ago, JJJ said:

They could make a set that represents Clazza’s goal in the 21 GF!

Lots of smiley faced MFC players and sad faced Doggies!!!

With a James Bradshaw figure shouting, “Bang! Bang, bang, bang!”

Screenshot_20250224_161204_Chrome.jpg.fe9c0da440e49eca05573a9d02e261f6.jpg

Screenshot_20250224_161204_Chrome.jpg.dfdd63f46bba6c95abaffa8edea2fca8.jpg

Screenshot_20250224_161204_Chrome.jpg.dfdd63f46bba6c95abaffa8edea2fca8.jpg

First got a Lego set in 1967, i think that was when it first came into Australia. 
 

Best Toy i ever had, apart from the Scalextric and the SSP Racers!!

Welcome…

 

My kids started on, and stayed with, 'big' brother, DUPLO. Never progressed to LEGO (my wallet said thank you). They did turn out OK, nonetheless; no evident developmental (brick?) walls hit.

My grandkids on the other hand; at the least excuse, yet another new themed (and usually franchised) box appears. My wallet now says thank you again, to their parents and the other set of grandparents!

Edited by Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

.

Edited by RedLegs23
Duplicate


7 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

Is it really a coincidence that we have both Harvey Langford and Lego onboard this year?

Lego Langers is building people!

🧱🤖

IMG_1497.jpeg.5b89ef6e8a9bec9e16ba00cfaacd1167.jpeg
IMG_0762.jpeg.a319e7780c6e086e887517b283b02507.jpeg

@Ghostwriter I believe in you 🫡☝️😎

A Lego MCG set, would be a 'money no object item', And Max Gawn built along the Starwars line of figures would be perfect.

37 minutes ago, DEE fence said:

A Lego MCG set, would be a 'money no object item', And Max Gawn built along the Starwars line of figures would be perfect.

I'd drop a grand on a Max Gawn lego bust.

10 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

anyone know at what level the sponsorship is? ie major, minor, shorts? 

As long as it isn’t boot insert😩😳

25 minutes ago, monoccular said:

As long as it isn’t boot insert😩😳

Lego GIF


12 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

anyone know at what level the sponsorship is? ie major, minor, shorts? 

They might be our socks sponsor.  Socks go on legos.

12 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

They might be our socks sponsor.  Socks go on legos.

Sockos go on Legos. 

Ok now all I want is for some very patient person to create a stop animation of a significant Dees moment in Lego!

Two moments that come to mind are Clarry's "Bang Bang Bang" goal in the GF, and Max Gawn marking and goaling after the siren vs Geelong.


I just love the way PR departments work. Lego our toy sponsor! Is this a first? I don't remember any club having a " toy sponsor"

 
5 hours ago, Nascent said:

Should be incorporated into our resilience training.

200.gif

Apparently Adelaide already doing this as a safer alternative to walking on hot coals. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies