Jump to content

Featured Replies

Culley makes most sense and seems most likely. A 194cm mid/forward who has already been in an AFL environment. He'd provide midfield depth in the short term, and at only 21 years of age and a mature age recruit, he could still develop to be a decent AFL player longer term also.

 

Going by the club's VFL | Match simulation player report - "In three 30-minute terms of VFL football under the baking sun, Jai Culley was a standout performer for the Demons as they fell one point shy of the home side after a slow start," Culley is looking like the favourite, especially in view of the fact that he was considered to be close in the last SSP deliberations before we took Jack Henderson.

 

14 hours ago, Redleg said:

That is going too far, because we simply don’t know.

He may develop or he may not, but he hasn’t had the chance to do that yet.

He deserves his chance and he will get it and good luck to him.

Unfortunate illness but he was atrocious last season

 

How can you average 2 disposals a game 

 

4 minutes ago, adonski said:

Boy George we hardly knew ya (he comes and goes..)

He stays and will play for Casey and maybe is added in the msd.

Josh Gabelich has just reported that the paperwork has been submitted to the AFL  for Culley to be a Melbourne player. 

42 minutes ago, rpfc said:

If your making a decision on SSP based on what the best 22 needs - god help us.

Culley surely gets a go.

Whether he ‘has a spot in the 22’ is as meaningless as speculating who is going to get the next season ending knee injury…

It's not so much that, but I think we have more resistance to injuries in certain areas of the ground. We have more midfield depth than we do small forward depth.

Maybe when you're choosing players in the first round of the draft you only think about talent but I find it odd that you wouldn't consider list needs when choosing a player to occupy the last spot on the list.

 
12 minutes ago, adonski said:

Boy George we hardly knew ya (he comes and goes..)

I'd think he'd be a chance at the MSD. If not that, maybe a rookie spot at season's end.

Wow things can move quickly at AFL, how good and from all the training reports very happy with Jai Culley.😁👍


ROUND 6, 2023 at Adelaide Oval (22 April 2023)
PORT ADELAIDE 3.2 9.6 13.9 16.13 (109)
WEST COAST
2.3 3.6 7.8 10.9  (69)
GOALS
Port Adelaide:
Finlayson 5, Rozee 2, Rioli 2, Burton 2, Byrne-Jones 2, Lord, Drew, Powell-Pepper
West Coast: Culley 4, Allen 2, Darling 2, Waterman, Petruccelle

What a whirlwind for Culley - gets delisted by West Coast, trains the house down at Melbourne before missing out on our first SSP spot only for a second to open up a few days later 😱

Anyway glad to have him despite AMW’s unfortunate injury 

I reckon the Eagles just might regret delisting him 

Some positive news if this is confirmed that the AFL has decided  to extend the SSP period.

It will be interesting for the following reasons.

1) What type of impact will Jai Culley have at the Demons?

2) Who will the Casey Demons take as a replacement now that Jai Culley will be on an AFL list?

3) Who will Carlton take as a replacement for Jagga Smith?

Culley isn't as far away as some think.

It's a long season and Culley is perfect if there's an injury to one of the bigger bodied mids, or players need a rest.  It might be Langford, or they may look to rest Viney, Petracca, Rivers, or Oliver later in the year.


1 hour ago, Redleg said:

He stays and will play for Casey and maybe is added in the msd.

Agree

Roy had a standout first game for Casey but his other two that I saw (admittedly in a weak Casey side) were nothing to inspire.

With the MFC pre-season and the ongoing Casey games (presumably every week at VFL level) he will get a good chance to show what he has

Securing Jai is a GREAT outcome. It's a real shame it came from a cruel injury to AMW, but it's something and if even half of what is said about him comes to fruition, he'll be a really valuable addition. He looks the goods. Ox loves him haha

...And to think, this came from some common sense from the AFL!! 

1 hour ago, KozzyCan said:

It's not so much that, but I think we have more resistance to injuries in certain areas of the ground. We have more midfield depth than we do small forward depth.

Maybe when you're choosing players in the first round of the draft you only think about talent but I find it odd that you wouldn't consider list needs when choosing a player to occupy the last spot on the list.

That’s a false economy; late picks in the draft are looking across all available, scouted players. You can make ‘needs’ based calls with those picks.

However, the SSP decision is working from a pool of train-on players over summer at the club and any that chose to train elsewhere.

Whoever is most promising AND agrees to come is who you should put on the list.

Perhaps the better place to lean on ‘needs’ is who you invite to train with the club over summer.

 

Edited by rpfc


27 minutes ago, rpfc said:

That’s a false economy; late picks in the draft are looking across all available, scouted players. You can make ‘needs’ based calls with those picks.

However, the SSP decision is working from a pool of train-on players over summer at the club and any that chose to train elsewhere.

Whoever is most promising AND agrees to come is who you should put on the list.

Perhaps the better place to lean on ‘needs’ is who you invite to train with the club over summer.

 

Yeah right and we have had both training with the club recently. That's why George and Culley were the names being floated and not some random blokes from some country footy club.

It's a moot point, we picked Culley so hopefully we've got a good player on board.

The latest in the state of play in relation to the SSP ~

Lachlan McAndrew - Adelaide 
Matt Carroll - Carlton
Francis Evans - Carlton
Will White - Carlton 
Tom Edwards - Essendon
Jaxon Prior - Essendon
Isaiah Dudley - Fremantle
Quinton Narkle - Fremantle
Ben Jepson - Gold Coast
Jai Culley - Melbourne 
Jack Henderson - Melbourne
Josh Lai - Port Adelaide
Harry Boyd - St Kilda
Sandy Brock - West Coast

Every year there are one or two dumped players who resurrect their careers and become successful at a new club. Hoping that at least one of Henderson or Culley falls into that bracket.

 

By the sounds of it, both Henderson and Culley sound hungry and determined to take this opportunity.

Hope this puts pressure on the likes of Sparrow, Chandler, Woey, Spargo etc (your role players) to perform or you’ll be at Casey quick smart (Goody not one to make massive changes unfortunately).

I get Jarryd Blair vibes for some reason with Henderson, not overly big, but played his role.

All the best Jai and Jack, hope you both star for us.

4 hours ago, Roy Boy said:

Goody not one to make massive changes unfortunately

Demonland myth.

Last year we used 36 players, which is around the AFL average (37).


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 95 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Sad
      • Love
      • Like
    • 361 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies