Jump to content

Wade Derksen

SthSea22
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

48 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

"Hey kid, you signed a contract" Might be the response.

I get your point though, I'm still thinking the deal gets done but you're hardly losing sleep not getting Wade Derksen to the club.

How good do you know he might be in2/3 years ? 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    Just now, 58er said:

    How good do you know he might be in2/3 years ? 

    No idea just running the law of averages over a  23 year old mid season selection who hasn’t played a game yet. Always happy to be wrong on these hunches.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 hours ago, Roost it far said:

    No idea just running the law of averages over a  23 year old mid season selection who hasn’t played a game yet. Always happy to be wrong on these hunches.

    He’ll be out of contract next year, so if we’re still looking for a player of his type, I’m sure we’ll be able to land him. It’ll be interesting to see if GWS play him next year, if for no other reason than to see why they didn’t let him go 😁.

    Edited by hardtack

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
     

    Looks like end of next year deal now.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Sad 2

    As many other posters have said, I can't see anyway this now gets done. 

    Whilst I completely understand that a club has a prerogative to keep a contracted player, I think GWS' decision here is pretty ordinary. Given the potential ins to the club, i.e. Stringer, and the glut of contracted forwards on their list who are being played or seemingly in-front of Derksen, holding him to the final year of his contract is frustrating.

    I'll be keeping a watch on him next year and I think it will be an interesting scenario if we look to re-attempt the trade next year, noting we've traded our future third, or if it now becomes a one-and-done type of scenario. 

    A disappointing outcome for both parties IMO. 

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Clap 2

    1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

    If Stringer lands at GWS which seems more than likely does that open the door for Derksen or is it shut? 

    We only have 1 pick left to trade (excluding 5 & 9 of course), which is apparently for Sharp

    Not sure if we're allowed to trade anymore future picks 

    Edited by adonski

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    On 13/10/2024 at 16:59, rjay said:

    It held Max's development back...wasn't a good move by the the FD but then not much was good from them at the time.

     

    I disagree, Max was in need of an attitude adjustment. Some tough love from Roosy was the making of him. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    6 minutes ago, adonski said:

    We only have 1 pick left to trade (excluding 5 & 9 of course), which is apparently for Sharp

    Not sure if we're allowed to trade anymore future picks 

    There's always picks if you want them bad enough as we proved today. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    10 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    I disagree, Max was in need of an attitude adjustment. Some tough love from Roosy was the making of him. 

    It was before Roosy's time...he did need an attitude adjustment but was played out of position.

    I saw him playing for Casey down at Werribee against Willy I think and he more than held his own against Hudson.

    ...but will still tried to make a forward of him.

    Was never going to be...

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    44 minutes ago, adonski said:

    We only have 1 pick left to trade (excluding 5 & 9 of course), which is apparently for Sharp

    Not sure if we're allowed to trade anymore future picks 

    We could do a future pick swap. A swap of F2s and/or F3s could probably benefit GWS.

    Alternatively we could do 9 for 15 + 21 + Derksen if we wanted to get radical.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    34 minutes ago, rjay said:

    It was before Roosy's time...he did need an attitude adjustment but was played out of position.

    I saw him playing for Casey down at Werribee against Willy I think and he more than held his own against Hudson.

    ...but will still tried to make a forward of him.

    Was never going to be...

    Might’ve happened at other times too but in 2015 the Russian played rounds 1-5, Spencer was the main ruck at Casey and got next crack at first ruck after Jamar got injured from from rounds 6-9.

    Roosy was putting the foot down at Max and not letting him ruck at Casey until he got his fitness up.

    The moment he got his chance in 2015 he was a star.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    If we do not get Derksen in this trade period I would keep Tomlinson.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    18 minutes ago, CHF said:

    If we do not get Derksen in this trade period I would keep Tomlinson.

    How does it work if he wants to go somewhere else but no one trades for him (and we still want to keep him).  They no longer have the pre-season draft do they?  

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, deelusions from afar said:

    How does it work if he wants to go somewhere else but no one trades for him (and we still want to keep him).  They no longer have the pre-season draft do they?  

    I think that we are in a position that if he is not picked up in the next couple of days he could be picked up at a later stage as a UFA by any club. We could make him a contract offer at any time a I understand it.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I hope the club don't give up on the pursuit of the DDD (Derk Diggler Deal), looks like an interesting cat.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

    I hope the club don't give up on the pursuit of the DDD (Derk Diggler Deal), looks like an interesting cat.

     

    I dunno how a deal gets done.

    But if GWS get Jake Stringer than it may still be a possibility?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    7 minutes ago, brendan said:

    Didn’t we get a future 3rd back in bombers trade could use that 

    AFL rules don't allow you to trade future 2+ round picks if you've traded out your future first. Because we used our future third in the Adelaide trade, and our future first in the pick 9 trade, our other future picks are currently untradeable 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    4 minutes ago, Mickey said:

    AFL rules don't allow you to trade future 2+ round picks if you've traded out your future first. Because we used our future third in the Adelaide trade, and our future first in the pick 9 trade, our other future picks are currently untradeable 

    you can, AFL just needs to tick it off. With 2 year future pick trading coming in next year, i doubt it wouldnt be signed off

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    Gut feel is that GWS will relent once Stringer deal goes through. Derksen's trade value should be no more than a late pick swap. A pick in the 60's should suffice.

    Not sure who his agent is, but if he's desperate to leave for family reasons, the agent would be putting pressure on GWS with threats of future dealings with the club.

    Edited by mo64

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    7 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

    you can, AFL just needs to tick it off. With 2 year future pick trading coming in next year, i doubt it wouldnt be signed off

    I thought that related just to trading F1s? I.e., you haven't taken at least 2 1st round picks in 4 years, so you can't trade another future 1st. I may be wrong.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    22 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    Gut feel is that GWS will relent once Stringer deal goes through. Derksen's trade value should be no more than a late pick swap. A pick in the 60's should suffice.

    Not sure who his agent is, but if he's desperate to leave for family reasons, the agent would be putting pressure on GWS with threats of future dealings with the club.

    It would require a bit of work at this stage to complete IMO, given our current draft hand and that we've offered Pick 49 to the Lions. We also have the consideration of needing points for the potential acquisition of Kalani White next year, should he nominate us, so I'm not too sure how we'd wrangle a mid-late future next year for Derksen (especially given the changes to the draft index). 

    I'm not definitively stating it can't be done, but it's precariously placed should GWS relent. 

    Edited by BLWNBA

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Only option we have to play with is future picks swaps. 

    Melb F2 and F3 for GWS F2 and F3. We need to end with a F2 and a F3 no matter who's pick it is.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

      What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

        • Thanks
      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Gold Coast

      From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Gold Coast

      Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

      With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 199 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

      The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

        • Sad
        • Like
      • 231 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

      Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 41 replies
      Demonland
    View All