Jump to content

GAMEDAY: QF vs Collingwood

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, whatwhat say what said:

i know / realise that noble's kicking hasn't been the best in the past few weeks

but he's played in the last 80-plus games in a row for them

it's a significant change to their backline

hoping it upsets their balance

Wouldn't surprise me at all if Noble is a late inclusion for one of the ruckmen should the predicted wet weather arrive before gametime.

    • Like 4
     
    9 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Three new (giant) faces to look out for in the crowd tomorrow night…

    BD489ADC-F21F-4388-9D46-B636DA318CBB.thumb.jpeg.04b91c2803cde90837c87a87ae13ca46.jpeg

    😃

    My boy Spaz! I feel like he's in a for a big game/series.

    spacer.png

    • Like 1
    • Love 1
    Just now, Dr. Gonzo said:

    My boy Spaz! I feel like he's in a for a big game/series.

    spacer.png

    I'm  expecting him to hit full beast mode in finals.  Underrated, but highly valuable impact type player.

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
     
    1 minute ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

    They might be able to quell one of that magnificent trio to an extent, but another Jack-in-the-box like Guss, Rivers, Sparrow or Kossie is likely to be injected into the midfield to cause some chaos.

    In particular, I think Tommy Sparrow is another of those 'built for finals' types we have.

    With Tommy Mac back in the team and Hibberd down back to play the third tall(ish) defender role, I also think the conditions are primed for Joel Smith to play that defensive forward role that Melksham was playing.  He's a great contested mark and I think it would absolutely suit him to have his opponent take him to the ball.  Once it hits the ground, he's got some of the best jets in the game and a great defensive mindset and tackling technique  to stop the fast rebound.

    Absolutely, absolutely, fully agree, these are the supports to which I was referring rather than mentioning; the role that could be played by JSmith is going to be our secret weapon up forward, doing all of the turning for TMac, turning on the respective jets and taking his entitlement of marks in his own right. 

    • Like 1
    2 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

    I'm  expecting him to hit full beast mode in finals.  Underrated, but highly valuable impact type player.

    Beast mode - suits him. Put him on deGoo-ey.

    • Like 2

    45 minutes ago, Demon Jack said:

    This feels too real now. I barely slept at all last night.

    Here's some great pump-up material I found on YouTube at 2:30 this morning.

     

    Geeze that's a ripper of a pump up.

    Got a feeling my man Viney is going to rip this game to shreds.

    Soooo 😭😭😭😭 I'm not going to be there, stupid old body heal faster!

    But remember all, live in the now, stay focused on being present and enjoying it.

    Edited by AzzKikA

    • Like 5
    • Love 1

    It's great reading the optimism in this thread - shows we see ourselves as real, legit contenders. The mindset has changed and hatsoff to the D's (both AFL and AFLW)  players and all others involved in making this so. Been waiting for this all my life - Go Demonsssssssss!

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    Despite the rain that might come and despite what we're hearing, Grundy might be the sub as insurance.  So if something happens to Max, we're covered

    It's not like the other 3 emergencies are game breakers or vital to the cause

     

    • Like 1
     

    I hate The Filth !

    • Like 4
    • Clap 2

    6 minutes ago, Winners at last said:

    Not as much as me ...

    No one can hate them more than I do.

    Can't wait to see how many "I hate the filth more than you" replies come.

    Edited by AzzKikA

    7 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Despite the rain that might come and despite what we're hearing, Grundy might be the sub as insurance.  So if something happens to Max, we're covered

    It's not like the other 3 emergencies are game breakers or vital to the cause

     

    Firstly, Laurie was vital as a sub in our comeback win against the Swans. And if Grundy was a "game breaker or vital to the cause" he'd be in the team. 

    Laurie deserves to be sub, but if not, JJ will get the gig. Grundy is the least likely to be the sub. 

     

     

    • Like 1

    Sportsbet odds have come in even further this morning. 

    Collingwood paying $1.88 and Melbourne paying $1.92.

    It's very likely they're even come the bounce of the ball.

    I've been a little nervous over the past week or so, but can't figure out whether it's more excitement or dread.

    I think my nerves will start to ramp up between 5-7pm, and my stomach will churn for probably the entire game.

    If we get our game right, we should win, but if we allow them to move the ball from half back and we're not on the entire night, I think they'll get us.

    Edited by Binmans PA

    42 players go to war tonight with Viney & Maynard. 

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2

    17 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Despite the rain that might come and despite what we're hearing, Grundy might be the sub as insurance.  So if something happens to Max, we're covered

    It's not like the other 3 emergencies are game breakers or vital to the cause

    i would doubt that grundy will be sub

    we'll know 90 mins before the bounce

    48 minutes ago, Demonland said:

    I've been refreshing the weather apps all morning.

    Good news for those with allergies. The Dust & Dander levels are LOW.

    Maybe ... but a large gathering of filth supporters at the G will ensure dangerous levels of various bacteria and poxes. A face mask might be a reasonable precaution.

    • Haha 1
    10 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    Firstly, Laurie was vital as a sub in our comeback win against the Swans. And if Grundy was a "game breaker or vital to the cause" he'd be in the team. 

    Laurie deserves to be sub, but if not, JJ will get the gig. Grundy is the least likely to be the sub.

    Laurie will be lucky to get on the ground before 3/4 time and it's difficult to impact games in those circumstances

    And as for being a game-breaker, that doesn't include Grundy either

    But for insurance, Grundy is easily the best option especially if something happens to Max

    We've got at least 10 players that can run through the midfield, why do we need 10.25 midfielders? 

    And we've only got 1 ruckman

    It's important to note that we're not talking about a starting 22 player.  The chances are our sub won't be on the ground until the last quarter

    So using Grundy as insurance is a logical decision, not left field

    • Like 1

    Looking at the 2021 GF team as the benchmark we are going in shorter to the QF.  We have 5 personnel changes and matching them up: JVR for Brown, Smith for Jackson, Chandler for Spargo, Hunter for Harmes and McVee for Petty.  It's this last one that signifies the change, but with wet weather forecast and still having 6 marking "talls" (May, Lever, Smith, JVR, TMac, Fritsch)  as I have posted, I don't think we're "too short". We'll probably have a 6th change from the GF side depending on who is sub, I expect it to be Laurie over JJ.

    I think Collingwood bat deeper in their midfield but I think with Nick Daicos out, our top end talent is superior and therefore the ball will be in our half more:

    • De Goey, Pendlebury, Mitchell, Crisp, Adams, J.Daicos, Sidebottom, Lipinski, Hoskin-Elliott
    • Petracca, Oliver, Viney, Brayshaw, Sparrow, Langdon, Hunter

    We killed them on KBW and it was only our errant kicking that kept them in it.  With more time in our forward half, accuracy is going to be key tonight but I have a good degree of confidence because all of Fritsch, TMac, JVR, Smith and Chandler are reliable shots and Pickett and ANB can be good if they are on. We'll need goals from Petracca too.

    I think we win.

    Edited by old55

    • Like 4
    • Love 1
    • Clap 1

    1 hour ago, Demonland said:

    I've been refreshing the weather apps all morning.

    Good news for those with allergies. The Dust & Dander levels are LOW.

    there's enough to worry about , weather is not one I will waste any time on .  

    11 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

    i would doubt that grundy will be sub

    we'll know 90 mins before the bounce

    Yes we will and as much as I'd have Grundy as the sub to cover for Max, I'm not sure it will happen

    But will we be surprised if the Collingwood ruckmen work Max over?  We all know that Cox can be a sniper and our MC should be expectating some dirty tactics against Gawn

    Thus, the insurance that might be needed to cover our only ruckman (a non starting insurance player)

     

    There is something special about playing the filth in a final. The highs or lows of the day have no equel in the emotional outcome of the day. 

    I hate the filth.

    54 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

    I’m a unique blend of confident and nervous.

    I have confidence in our system, our form and our preparation. 

    But I am extremely nervous because, as good as we are, Collingwood are good too and are better than many here give them credit for. And so much rides on this game - a home prelim against St Kilda or an interstate side, or a semi against Carl/Syd just for the right to get on a plane for an interstate prelim. 

    Fair to say you’re living up to your nomenclature then, TU?

    Agreed, anybody here underestimating the Pies has rocks in their head. The noise their crowd emanates is, while on a day-to-day level completely indecipherable, very much a weapon at footy games, and they will be rabid in a finals atmosphere. We need to bring the noise. 
     

    And the team/coaches need to do whatever they can to diffuse the tactic of negating Max. This is where I think the game will be decided. 

    Edited by Mel Bourne


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Thanks
      • 133 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 388 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All