Jump to content

Featured Replies

Is it politically okay to start chanting Colliwobble, Colliwobble ….. even though we are still in August?  

 
1 hour ago, Bates Mate said:

 Anyone anywhere is the attitude I've got and know the club feel the same as we should. I don't fear any team at any venue 

I'm positive the players and coaches have the same attitude. 

We've got the lions measure wherever we play them.

Port too. And pies.

But there's a fair bit to play out in the next round and a half.

Win the next two and let where we finish work itself out.

50 minutes ago, binman said:

I'm positive the players and coaches have the same attitude. 

We've got the lions measure wherever we play them.

Port too. And pies.

But there's a fair bit to play out in the next round and a half.

Win the next two and let where we finish work itself out.

If we end up playing Brisbane at the Gabba, even if we lose, there is 2nd chance. Better than needing to play them at the Gabba in a prelim final.

Assuming we win the next two weeks, no injuries and reasonable form and hopefully Fritsch gets back okay, I think we stack up well against other top 4! Pies wobbling, Port also wobbled, and Lions losing that game to us at the ‘G’ plus Ashcroft out will hurt them.

Next time we play Lions, we have Oliver and Fritsch in, Petty out who was injured most of that Lions game! They have Ashcroft out!

 

 

Want to be playing our first final in melb which would be Collingwood, biggest issue is the instability of our fwd live with continued change through injuries & the 2 Rucks are not working, let’s hope it’s not a repeat of 2022 

I know it's tedious to talk about, but my only fear going into the finals is not any particular club, or venue, but poor umpiring in key momentum shifting moments. 

Edited by John Demonic


3 hours ago, John Demonic said:

I know it's tedious to talk about, but my only fear going into the finals is not any particular club, or venue, but poor umpiring in key momentum shifting moments. 

 

7 hours ago, John Demonic said:

Getting Carlton into the 8 was more important than creating a handful of dead rubbers

This. HQ been trying for 2 years and finally succeeded. Blues will get another armchair ride from the umps today. $$$$$$$$$

Let's just win our last 2 games and let the cards fall where they fall. 

The only thing i'm worried about for September is our forward set-up. A lack of a tall option to partner JVR is the only chink in our armour. 

34 minutes ago, BDA said:

Let's just win our last 2 games and let the cards fall where they fall. 

The only thing i'm worried about for September is our forward set-up. A lack of a tall option to partner JVR is the only chink in our armour. 

The pies fwd line reminds me of our own issues. They are relying on " short talls" like Howe.

They too are lacking some big key feds and it showed against the Lions with players like Hopwood and Danihers.

 

 
8 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Biffen was also sent to Siberia to break rocks.

Not sure about 13, last i saw of him, he was hiding in a Cigarette machine awaiting new instructions 

It's always the good ones...

10 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Maynard has a very rude head….

Rumour from a few years ago - we had Maynard in the bag. The board vetoed based on the 'one bad haircut' policy. At Melbourne, one is more than enough.


1 hour ago, leave it to deever said:

The pies fwd line reminds me of our own issues. They are relying on " short talls" like Howe.

They too are lacking some big key feds and it showed against the Lions with players like Hopwood and Danihers.

 

Pies scored 100 pts though as their system caters for the lack of talls. I would be happy if we kicked 100pts every game from now on. We have scored 100+ 8x and won them all.

Edited by Watson11

39 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Rumour from a few years ago - we had Maynard in the bag. The board vetoed based on the 'one bad haircut' policy. At Melbourne, one is more than enough.

Sounds like it was the same people who helped us dodge the bullet of picking toby greene in the pick swap with GWS (was the Dom Tyson trade i believe).

TOOTHLESS FERALS to go out in straight sets IMV!😄

In season 2023, the reality is that the real contenders make it a top 5, not top 4. And this throws all kinds of spanners into finals calculations.

The 5th team - Carlton - are playing finals-type footy, are winning close games, are confident and their power forwards can dominate. Those in positions 6 - 8 are fairly irrelevant in terms of the GF. Any of this top 5 can beat each other, and with the exception of Carlton in recent weeks, the other 4 teams have shown enough weaknesses to demonstrate they are beatable. The Blues are the big variable because they can still make top 4.

It comes down to belief and application moment by moment on game day. The Dees and Pies have 1 thing in common above the others, and that is they believe they can win from anywhere, regardless of being behind or momentum being with the other team they play. 


12 hours ago, Macca said:

Are you up with modern sporting trends?  Teams aren't serious in games that don't matter once they've locked in their pathway

We're just a bit behind in Oz.  Which is par for the course

Those here who follow the NFL or the NBA or even the MLB and soccer know what I'm talking about

I wouldnt use NFL and NBA as a comparison for anything. They dont even play football in USA. They play Throwball or Chuck ball. They rarely kick it. How many NFL players can kick the ball that isnt even designed for kicking? Maybe one or two in the entire team.  Slow Rugby with college girl cheerleaders. 

Basketball....theyre 7-7 "6 tall and drop a huge ball into an even bigger hoop on a tiny little court.  Most meaningless game ever invented.

Hollywood actors, rappers and pod casters sit in the front row utterly zonked out of their brains. Thats America for you.

Edited by Deebauched

44 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

 

The point is do we want to risk imjury to any of our best players in a dead rubber? (if the Swans game is a dead rubber)

And people are the same all over especially when it comes to winning at all costs

1 minute ago, Macca said:

The point is do we want to risk imjury to any of our best players in a dead rubber? (if the Swans game is a dead rubber)

And people are the same all over especially when it comes to winning at all costs

Last nights result changed all that.

I also thought it would be a dead rubber. Pies fall over again and Lions will definitely mutilate the Saints at the Gabba. We finish 4th and its off to the Gabba again.  ffs

Atleast Pies game is first cab off the rank R24. We'll have a better idea then.

9 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

Last nights result changed all that.

I also thought it would be a dead rubber. Pies fall over again and Lions will definitely mutilate the Saints at the Gabba. We finish 4th and its off to the Gabba again.  ffs

Atleast Pies game is first cab off the rank R24. We'll have a better idea then.

If Port beat Freo the odds are that we'll be finishing 4th so whoever finishes 1st or 2nd will be what it is

So the chances are that win or lose, we will probably finish 4th (if Port win their last 2 and the Lions beat the Saints)

There might be an upset result which would therefore change everything.  Mine is a hypothetical where any resting of players is dependant on how the other results go

By the last Sunday of the season we'll know what we have to do (or not do)

First of all, we need to beat the Hawks

3 minutes ago, Macca said:

If Port beat Freo the odds are that we'll be finishing 4th so whoever finishes 1st or 2nd will be what it is

So the chances are that win or lose, we will probably finish 4th (if Port win their last 2 and the Lions beat the Saints)

There might be an upset result which would therefore change everything.  Mine is a hypothetical where any resting of players is dependant on how the other results go

By the last Sunday of the season we'll know what we have to do (or not do)

First of all, we need to beat the Hawks

Assuming we know if that last game is a dead rubber, is there anything in the rules that would stop us playing all four emergencies and simply resting Gawn, May, Viney for example. 


Port rested 7 players albeit different circumstances.

Bringing in 4 emergencies is simply a big emergency with alot of goodwill.

Or you can take the Scott option and claim half your team fell ill after a dodgy meal night before game.(2021 prelim) Easily explained away in a place like Sydney.

2 hours ago, Deebauched said:

Couldnt bare it if we had to play the Lions at the Gabba yet again and again.

In Bourke Street?  :D

 
8 hours ago, John Demonic said:

I know it's tedious to talk about, but my only fear going into the finals is not any particular club, or venue, but poor umpiring in key momentum shifting moments. 

That’s something that can affect both teams… I don’t subscribe to this ‘umpires are out to get us’ conspiracy.

I have read lots of posts from Pies supporters on Twitter and they seem to be OK with dropping the minor premiership.

They don't fancy playing us at the G' and rather would play Port at the G'.

Colliwobbles 😁😁😁


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 29 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 238 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies