Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, Bates Mate said:

No expectation is less stressful

I feel sorry for you 

IN: Lever, Hibberd, Gawn and Brown

OUT: Spargo, Tomlinson, McDonald, Melksham

 

B: McVee, May, Bowey

HB: Brayshaw, Lever, Rivers

C: Hunter, Oliver, Langdon

HF: Petracca, van Rooyen, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, Brown, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Viney, Pickett

IC: Hibberd, Sparrow, Grundy, Petty

SUB: Jordon

 

 

Gawn will be back for round 8 V Gc IMO.

Can’t see them risking our biggest asset this early in the season for winnable game against Richmond and North.


6 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Gawn will be back for round 8 V Gc IMO.

Can’t see them risking our biggest asset this early in the season for winnable game against Richmond and North.

If he is ready , he plays. Don’t forget that Gawn and Grundy still need to refine their chemistry.

Lever <> Tommo

Tmac  <> BBB

Hibbo <> Melk

Spargo <> JJ

Gawn <> ???

Edited by Gawndy the Great

Out: Spargo (concussion), Tommo, T-Mac, Melk(Sub)

In: Lever, JJ, BBB, Gawn

Gawn only if he is 100%, and if not I think we have to consider Schache to chop out Grundy.

Sparrow on high notice.

Melksham never to be in the starting line up again please!

5 hours ago, picket fence said:

Rob Flowers Dad Al was dead against him playing as a 17year old and had to be CONVINCED by Noel Mc Mahon that he should play, But his father said no for the reasons you allude to!! His dad relented and The rest was HISTORY

I get your piont, but if, IF Merlin fires ......... PLAY HIM!!

Agree Picket Fence. Not necessarily at CHF or FF either.
MJ could probably play as a half forward flanker in the Fritsch mould.  He is a forward with a forwards brain and style of play so is suited to AFL level if he earns his spot in the Casey team with a good performance. 

Forget all this too light stuff as long as he plays on the flank not against  a 1,2or 3 defender. 

 
3 hours ago, Travy14 said:

Melksham never to be in the starting line up again please!

🙄🥱

10 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Howes and Turner are both competing for the 3rd tall defender if Petty goes forward and we want a Hibbo replacement. Turner more ready for that job. But would love to see Howes start to demand a go.

We’re yet to give JJ a second full game, I don’t see Harmes or Laurie jumping him. Unless Laurie is just blistering and they want him in Spargo’s role.

Schache a small chance if they want to keep Petty back. 

Moniz-Wakefield? I’d love to see it 

How are Howes and Turner competing for thr same spot?

Both have been playing completely different positions to each other at Casey.

Howes has been playin the quarterback role that's been used as one of their main distributors off half back. He's also been pushing higher up the field to add as an extra around the midfield as a sweeper.

Turner played deep defence last week.

Edited by dazzledavey36


I’m worried Goodwin won’t drop Tmac after that one poor performance, but I can’t see how he doesn’t come out for Brown on team balance.

Out: Tomlinson, Spargo, Melksham, Tmac

In: Lever, Hibberd, Brown, Jordan

Petty, Brown and JvR as the starting tall forwards. 

Richmond only have two tall forwards (Ryan and Riewoldt) so Petty can play forward on Balta.

Edited by At the break of Gawn

It worries me if we rush Max in.  Just last week Goodwin said he was at least a month away and we wouldn't take any chances. 

We are playing Richmond and they have some key experienced outs:  Lynch, Nankervis, Broad, Soldo, Graham so match-ups may drive selections. 

Out:  Spargo (Concussion), TMc (back/rib injury???), Tomlinson (Form)

In: Laurie, Brown, Lever

Melksham probably out but don't know who we would bring in for him.  Jordon but he is not a fwd...

There are others that should probably be out if injured or out of form but doubt we can or will make too many changes.  And no one should be dropped on one poor game.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

1 hour ago, At the break of Gawn said:

I’m worried Goodwin won’t drop Tmac after that one poor performance, but I can’t see how he doesn’t come out for Brown on team balance.

Out: Tomlinson, Spargo, Melksham, Tmac

In: Lever, Hibberd, Brown, Jordan

Petty, Brown and JvR as the starting tall forwards. 

Richmond only have two tall forwards (Ryan and Riewoldt) so Petty can play forward on Balta.

Mc Donald has had 1 good game and 3 poor ones. His mobility is about the same as the Robot in Lost in Space. He goes back to Casey IMO

Out TMac Bowie, Spargo, Tomlison

In BBB, Hibberd, Lever Jordan

1 minute ago, loges said:

Out TMac Bowie, Spargo, Tomlison

In BBB, Hibberd, Lever Jordan

Bowey was poor, but we can’t drop him on that performance alone. I’d move him forward to cover Spargo. 
 


12 minutes ago, SPC said:

Bowey was poor, but we can’t drop him on that performance alone. I’d move him forward to cover Spargo. 
 

I'd like to see that.

That is the second poor game for pretty much everyone this season so I’m ok if goody wants to send a message to the Group and swings some changes.

Lever and BBB are automatic inclusions if fit for Tomo and Melksham.  

I’m a huge fan of Spargo but maybe a run in the 2’s might help him. He’s just not his usual self at the moment.

TMac? It’s getting harder to consider him best 22. His good games are too few and far between. I think he’s at a critical juncture. He needs to start performing otherwise he’s depth only.

Lever, BBB, Hibberd and Jordan in for Tomlinson, Melksham, Spargo (concussion) and Sparrow who becomes the sub

Edited by DemonLad5

Sounded from Goodwin's presser that Gawn is playing this week. He is a quick healer, although I guess he has technically already missed 4 given he only lasted 5 minutes into the Brisbane game. Yesterday showed how important he is to our defence. Grundy does some things very well, but defending isn't one of them.  Hopefully Lever is right to go too.  Beware the wounded Tiger.


22 minutes ago, Swooper1987 said:

Sounded from Goodwin's presser that Gawn is playing this week. He is a quick healer, although I guess he has technically already missed 4 given he only lasted 5 minutes into the Brisbane game. Yesterday showed how important he is to our defence. Grundy does some things very well, but defending isn't one of them.  Hopefully Lever is right to go too.  Beware the wounded Tiger.

He'd want to be 100%

2 hours ago, picket fence said:

Mc Donald has had 1 good game and 3 poor ones. His mobility is about the same as the Robot in Lost in Space. He goes back to Casey IMO

Only on the basis say Schache replaces him. Needs to be for another chance to find a forward though not just redoing previous Casey runs. 

There is an article on HS supposedly talking about Gawn return date. As it’s behind paywall cannot see it - has anyone else read the article and care to summarise ?

 

Every game is a danger game . Richmond and Norff could easily knock us off if we stand around giggling.

If Gawn says he can play then play him immediately. Get Brown and Lever back plus the right attitude and we win.

Special thanks to Gill and AFL.....

Melbourne get a miserable 6 day break after playing in Perth.

Collingwood played at the Gabba so the AFL made sure they were well rested and fit for the Gather round 10  days break.

Dont tell me that is just how the fixture works. Melbourne  ,once again, dont even get a mid season bye. Pies get 13 days. We get the same 'break' as Collingwood got from r4 to r5.

 

Edited by Deebauched

5 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

Every game is a danger game . Richmond and Norff could easily knock us off if we stand around giggling.

If Gawn says he can play then play him immediately. Get Brown and Lever back plus the right attitude and we win.

Special thanks to Gill and AFL.....

Melbourne get a miserable 6 day break after playing in Perth.

Collingwood played at the Gabba so the AFL made sure they were well rested and fit for the Gather round 10  days break.

Dont tell me that is how the fixture works. Melbourne  ,once again, dont even get a mid season bye.

 

Gawny is not needed till the North game on Sat 29th. Debauched not very observant only 5 days between AnzEve and Round7. 

But he also forgets that we have a 9 day break also. Let's be consistent Deb? 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies