Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 2/20/2023 at 11:41 AM, Orion said:

Sometimes things can be misinterpreted through text so maybe that's what's happened here.  If that is the case I apologise and will un-ignore QB.

Just wait until you get a private message from BBO (Bitter But Optimistic). It wont be angry but it could contain a dose of "think right" or other behavioral advice. I would be cautious about following such advice. He has good intentions (sometimes) however he has been known to delve into some murky ....... suggestions.

Welcome to the mad house.

 
On 2/20/2023 at 5:58 PM, Fanatique Demon said:

Aside from Petracca’s “broken leg” there were no obviously banged up players in my view. And Trac actually played well.

 

4 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

'm glad someone here hasn't gone for the "banged up excuse" as to why we lost both our finals, although I do concede Gawn could barely get out of a jog in the Brisbane final.

There's another one and I'm sure we could find more.

Let me add Clarrie to the list with his thumb that was still giving trouble after Christmas in pre season.

Anyone care to add a few more....

There's more than one reason...banged up is one.

Anyone trying to find and/or reckon they have THE reason is kidding themselves.

 
On 2/20/2023 at 5:58 PM, Fanatique Demon said:

Over the weekend I watched our last two games against Brisbane last year.  Aside from Petracca’s “broken leg” there were no obviously banged up players in my view. And Trac actually played well. The difference between the drubbing we handed them and the disappointment of the final seemed to be lack of dare. When we were desperate in the last few minutes we kicked two quick goals. Of course Lever’s brain fade and Kosi’s ill-discipline (two down the field frees for late tackles and a 50m penalty) didn’t help us. But it seemed to me that in the final we were going through the motions, thinking the game was ours any time we wanted it. Then all of a sudden, reality dawned on us, but too late. That’s mind-set, not fitness or injuries. Bath water, anyone?

Was at the final and watched us closely in the warm up and knew we were in trouble.

Ben Brown, Lever, Trac, Gawn and Salem all looked lame. No doubt a touch of bathwater , but we were ripe for the picking. If we were not playing so hurt Brisbane would not have got near us.

On 2/20/2023 at 10:48 AM, Orion said:

Well the warped sense of humour has been added to the ignore list because it sounds pretty angry to me

I would have thought you like a good belt.


30 minutes ago, rjay said:

 

There's another one and I'm sure we could find more.

Let me add Clarrie to the list with his thumb that was still giving trouble after Christmas in pre season.

Anyone care to add a few more....

There's more than one reason...banged up is one.

Anyone trying to find and/or reckon they have THE reason is kidding themselves.

I listened to Kate roffey's agm speech earlier today.

She mentioned we had quite a few injured players, some of whom no one knew/knows about 

4 hours ago, Stu said:

Zero Hanger have done 50 predictions for the 2023 season - this article shows their top 10 predictions. I'd just scroll down to number one ;) 

50 fearless predictions for the 2023 AFL season: 10-1 - AFL News - Zero Hanger

Cheers stuie.

There were 10 players at Victoria House the week before the Swans game. Max alone was there 3 times. MFC won’t use injuries as an excuse and we all know there were many contributing factors but don’t dismiss  the fact that we had a lot of players carrying stuff. 

 

Agree that we had injuries but you can't say we were the only team leading into finals with injury concerns. It is one factor but imo another factor is the desire, they just didn't seem to want it as much as 2021, could it have been the fact we won it the year before and the desperation to break the drought just wasn't there?


27 minutes ago, AzzKikA said:

Agree that we had injuries but you can't say we were the only team leading into finals with injury concerns. It is one factor but imo another factor is the desire, they just didn't seem to want it as much as 2021, could it have been the fact we won it the year before and the desperation to break the drought just wasn't there?

Injuries are both underplayed and overplayed. On one hand every team has injuries unspoken or otherwise but on the other many industry say that a healthy list is one of the most important components of having a decent chance to win the flag.

What we don’t know is how many of these players play A regular season game? Trac is probably the only that clearly misses. 

Funny thing is that in 2020 May plays the GF with 4-5 week hammy. 

13 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Injuries are both underplayed and overplayed. On one hand every team has injuries unspoken or otherwise but on the other many industry say that a healthy list is one of the most important components of having a decent chance to win the flag.

What we don’t know is how many of these players play A regular season game? Trac is probably the only that clearly misses. 

Funny thing is that in 2020 May plays the GF with 4-5 week hammy. 

Yep, I think I remember that was part of the general strategy from Burgess for players with niggles to just keep playing through them.

It worked for May in the granny.

However, when there's 10 or 11 (so the rumour goes) players carrying injuries and going into their shell once we're in front, we were always going to fall short.

We really didn't look fit enough to run out games.

Our disposal was sloppier towards the ends of games.

I think other teams worked us out a bit.

I think we may have been mentally fatigued and not ready to go to another level to win another flag last year.

I'm hoping we'll come back harder in all of these areas this year.

Remember the old days (10 years ago) when the Demons bouncing back would be, how do we bounce back from second last on the ladder to maybe squeeze out 8-10 wins?  Now we need to bounce back from coming second on the ladder! 

times have changed! and who's loving it?!

On 2/20/2023 at 12:21 PM, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Sorry for the misunderstanding @Orion. I thought your observation about JVR was spot on. Love your work. Long may astute observations such as yours reign on 'Land. We need people like you as a counter-weight to people like me (and certain others - you know who you are 😍).

I thought it simply showed that Orio doesn’t understand sarcasm.

And clearly is a very poor judge of footballers. I watched most Casey games & JVR is an outstanding talent. His season was almost as good as Fritters before he was recruited. He well deserved his selections as an emergency last year.


15 hours ago, AzzKikA said:

Agree that we had injuries but you can't say we were the only team leading into finals with injury concerns. It is one factor but imo another factor is the desire, they just didn't seem to want it as much as 2021, could it have been the fact we won it the year before and the desperation to break the drought just wasn't there?

While you can't control GETTING injured, you can control management of players and loading through the year. I would be shocked and disappointed if our fitness/injury management team didn't recognise some significant mistakes throughout the season. The most glaring was the decision to take Max over to Perth for the WC game. I get that you should always respect the opposition but there are times when management of players is absolutely critical, Geelong mastered it last season and now it's on the selection team to place faith in the squad to ensure players that are tired or playing through pain are given an opportunity to rest properly.

We need to get back to being fast finishers, not limping over the line. 

17 hours ago, Brownie said:

Yep, I think I remember that was part of the general strategy from Burgess for players with niggles to just keep playing through them.

It worked for May in the granny.

However, when there's 10 or 11 (so the rumour goes) players carrying injuries and going into their shell once we're in front, we were always going to fall short.

We really didn't look fit enough to run out games.

Our disposal was sloppier towards the ends of games.

I think other teams worked us out a bit.

I think we may have been mentally fatigued and not ready to go to another level to win another flag last year.

I'm hoping we'll come back harder in all of these areas this year.

All excellent points Brownie.

At the risk of being captain obvious, I'd add that in addition to negatively impacting on match day performance, carrying injury would also have an impact on a players' capacity to build and/or maintain fitness levels (even if they continued to participate in full training ie not rehabbing).

Logic suggests there is a correlation between the length of time a player has carried something (and the specific injury) and the impact on fitness levels.

As an example, let's take Maxy and Lever.

Both appeared to be 'not quite right' from at least mid-season (probably all season for Lever).

Their performance was clearly impacted, but it is very likely so was their fitness.

No surprise then that they both looked totally gassed late in games at the back end of the season. 

Thats two of our best 22 not at optimal performance or fitness levels for nigh on half a season.

I think it is reasonable to assume there were quite a few more in a similar boat (eg Salo, BB).

And even more players again who picked up an injury that impacted fitness levels as the season progressed.

As you say, the suggestion is we 10 or 11 such players come final time. So almost half the team. No wonder we struggled. 

Bottom line, as you say, they struggled to run out games in the last fifth of the season. That was clear as day.

And if someone didn't believe their eyes, the scoreboard told the tale.

In our last five games, not once did we out score the opposition in the second half. 

Working back from the semi, the margin at HT and full time in our last five games were:

  • Lions game: up by 22 points at HT, lost by 13 - a six goal swing
  • Swans game: down by six points at HT, lost by 22 - - a three goal swing
  • Lions game: up by 66 at HT, won by 58 - one goal swing
  • Blues game: up by 8 points at HT, won by 5 points - 0.5 goal swing 
  • Pies game: up by 17 points at HT, lost by 7 points - 4 goal swing

To be crystal clear I'm not saying fitness and injury were the only factors at play.

But in my opinion, fitness and injury were, by some margin, the biggest factors in our poor performance.  

Edited by binman

18 hours ago, rjay said:

 

There's another one and I'm sure we could find more.

Let me add Clarrie to the list with his thumb that was still giving trouble after Christmas in pre season.

Anyone care to add a few more....

There's more than one reason...banged up is one.

Anyone trying to find and/or reckon they have THE reason is kidding themselves.

1. Because we didn't review the 2018 Preliminary Final

2. Because we don't have a home base

3. It's all Jack Watts' fault

7 hours ago, binman said:

All excellent points Brownie.

At the risk of being captain obvious, I'd add that in addition to negatively impacting on match day performance, carrying injury would also have an impact on a players' capacity to build and/or maintain fitness levels (even if they continued to participate in full training ie not rehabbing).

Logic suggests there is a correlation between the length of time a player has carried something (and the specific injury) and the impact on fitness levels.

As an example, let's take Maxy and Lever.

Both appeared to be 'not quite right' from at least mid-season (probably all season for Lever).

Their performance was clearly impacted, but it is very likely so was their fitness.

No surprise then that they both looked totally gassed late in games at the back end of the season. 

Thats two of our best 22 not at optimal performance or fitness levels for nigh on half a season.

I think it is reasonable to assume there were quite a few more in a similar boat (eg Salo, BB).

And even more players again who picked up an injury that impacted fitness levels as the season progressed.

As you say, the suggestion is we 10 or 11 such players come final time. So almost half the team. No wonder we struggled. 

Bottom line, as you say, they struggled to run out games in the last fifth of the season. That was clear as day.

And if someone didn't believe their eyes, the scoreboard told the tale.

In our last five games, not once did we out score the opposition in the second half. 

Working back from the semi, the margin at HT and full time in our last five games were:

  • Lions game: up by 22 points at HT, lost by 13 - a six goal swing
  • Swans game: down by six points at HT, lost by 22 - - a three goal swing
  • Lions game: up by 66 at HT, won by 58 - one goal swing
  • Blues game: up by 8 points at HT, won by 5 points - 0.5 goal swing 
  • Pies game: up by 17 points at HT, lost by 7 points - 4 goal swing

To be crystal clear I'm not saying fitness and injury were the only factors at play.

But in my opinion, fitness and injury were, by some margin, the biggest factors in our poor performance.  

Thanks Binman. I was at the last home and away against the Lions. While it was great, it proved to be an anomaly. The lions defence was woeful that night. Even Kozzy seemed to be proppy that night.

I couldn't work out during the season why we seemed to get more and more predictable kicking into the forward pocket. Was it a deliberate ploy because we knew we only had Fritta left as our sole fit Key forward.

I'm encouraged by the training reports and hope we're both fit and willing to take the game on and go the corridors and switch play.

 

I will be looking at stats around defensive pressure and how easily other teams take it out of our forward line.

It was an early indicator that we didn’t have it together last year where we slipped from the top 4 for forward pressure in 2021 to the bottom 4 in 2022.

And the way we entered the forward line into the near side pocket was designed to mitigate that problem as it was harder for the opposition to transition out of the populated area. 

Let’s hope we back ourselves more this year to kick to lead and kick fat side to space.


On 2/21/2023 at 5:51 AM, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Cheers stuie.

 

Edited by David-Demon

My unfortunate view on the difference between the Lions win in Round 23 and the finals loss.

Some generalisation about our 2022:

(1) We were awfully inaccurate in so many games that it cost us wins.

(2) We usually dominated first quarters and sometimes first halves, but too often gave little in second halves or couldn’t run out games.

This is exactly why we smashed Brisbane in Round 23 and lost the final.

- We were unusually deadset accurate in the first half of our Round 23 game, nailing even the most unlikely of goals. Interestingly, the scores after half time were fairly level. We were just so far ahead the game was over.

- We were typically inaccurate in the first quarter of the final. If we had have had the same accuracy as the Round 23 game, the game probably would have been over at 1/4 time.

So, in a nutshell, if we weren’t deadset (and unusually) accurate in the Round 23 game, our lead at 1/2 time wokld have been much slimmer, potentially opening a door for the Lions to think they were a chance, especially how average our second halves had been (and it was nothing special either in the Round 23 game).

Edited by Glorious Day

11 hours ago, rpfc said:

I will be looking at stats around defensive pressure and how easily other teams take it out of our forward line.

It was an early indicator that we didn’t have it together last year where we slipped from the top 4 for forward pressure in 2021 to the bottom 4 in 2022.

Credit to you RPFC, you called the issue with forward defensive pressure early last season. I didn't think it was an indication of an issue, but you were proven right and i was proven wrong. 

 
47 minutes ago, binman said:

Credit to you RPFC, you called the issue with forward defensive pressure early last season. I didn't think it was an indication of an issue, but you were proven right and i was proven wrong. 

Am I in upside down world? Someone is actually admitting they were wrong on Demonland!? 🙃

2 hours ago, binman said:

Credit to you RPFC, you called the issue with forward defensive pressure early last season. I didn't think it was an indication of an issue, but you were proven right and i was proven wrong. 

Ta, Binman. I seriously hated being right. I just can’t see us being so inert next season so I hope it is over. And I hope it was health related and the FD was fixing bandaids so to speak.

Edited by rpfc


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 10

    The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Thanks
    • 129 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 11 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 284 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 53 replies
    Demonland