Jump to content

Featured Replies

  On 24/06/2022 at 01:51, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Southern Stand / Shane Warne stand is always an Opposition heartland. I almost tinnitus from the Collingwood supporters on QB yelling like it was a Grand final

It was their grand final!

 

I was at home watching the Tele and it sure sounded the majority were dees supporters. It is always hard to see on TV because the majority would be in the northern stands that TV does not capture. But the sound suggested we had the biggest numbers. I am getting used to watching on TV and as the next 5 games are away games and only available on TV I doubt I will not get to a game before mid August it might only be finals appearances. Out of the last eight games only two are at the G and they are both night games. Thank God for Kayo

Edited by old dee

 
  On 24/06/2022 at 01:07, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Currently workshopping in my mind a joke about Brisbane being Queenslanders and therefore nicknamed bananas, who are battered by Fritsch and somehow we get banana fritters in batter.  (Clearly the joke is a work in progress.)

Fritters batters the bananas?


As an AFL member who alternates between AFL Members and behind the Melbourne Cheer Squad AND Olympic Stands, I can say that the crowd was probably 55;45 Melbourne's way. BUT Brisbane were undoubtedly louder. And more confined. Strong performing interstate teams (GC and GWS aside) always get a good showing. Especially Brisbane and Sydney. I think our attendance as a support base this year has been okay... we are lucky to have played a lot of top 8-10 sides in home games.

  On 24/06/2022 at 01:07, JimmyGadson said:

You keep failing to mention that Brisbane have also had a big month of travel.

And for our first quarter last night, where was our energy? Or did the 'loading theory' kick in after quarter time? 

 

Do you mean the same side who were coming off an 11 day break (including the mandatory four days away from the club), to our 9 day break?

I'm no sports scientist, but i'm guessing they might have recovered from their 'big month of travel' by last night's game.

As for the second point, not sure if you are serious. Did we watch the same game?

We were ferocious in the first quarter from the get go - and clearly energised. And we sustained that energy from minute one of the game 'till the end of the game. 

Did that mean we smashed them from the start?

No of course not - the lions were terrific in the first 20 minutes of the game and their pressure was formidable (which makes sense of course, as the first 20 minutes of the game would be when they would feel the least impact of any loading, just as was the case for us in our three losses).

We had a clear strategy to use handball to chain away from contests (a strategy we employed in our Anzac eve clash against the tigers last year) - and under the lions' pressure we missed quite a few and handball chains broke down, creating turnovers. But that wasn't a function of us not being enegerised, it was a function of the pressure and heat the lions brought. 

As i noted earlier in this thread, it was clear to me we were fresh and energized for this game, when in the last 10 minutes of the first quarter we were able to first blunt the lion's momentum, but more importantly, then lift our rating, start closing the vice and suffocating the lions, as we do when we are at our best. And in this same period the lions started to fade.

The lead up to the goal Harmes kicked with 90 seconds to go in the first quarter was incredible. That was right below me, and the dees fought like caged lions to trap it inside our 50 and scrap for the ball that eventually kicked out to Harmes. 

Do you want some more evidence of our high energy levels in the first? 

At the end of the first quarter, we led forward-half groundballs 17 to 6 and forward-half contested possessions overall 26 to 11.

We led inside 50s 12-10 and clearances were even at 7-7.

I don't know the end of quarter contested possession numbers, but the lions had 31 fewer contested possessions in the first half, their worst first-half differential since Round 5, 2016, which would suggest that that we were ahead, or at the very least break even for cps in the first quarter.

But i would be very surprised if we were not ahead for CPs at the end of the first quarter given the half time CP differential and the fact we were 26 to 11 forward-half cps at the end of the first quarter.

Hardly numbers to suggest we lacked energy in the first quarter, or that the 'loading theory' didn't kick in till the second quarter.

But hey, we all see the game differently. 

Edited by binman

 
  On 24/06/2022 at 01:07, JimmyGadson said:

But if it was as important as you make out, you'd think the experts (many of whom have coached and played at the highest level), would be giving it a lot more air time through the media. It interests me why that isn't the case.. 

 

As for this point, it really interests me too why the 'experts' (many of whom have coached and played at the highest level) wouldn't be giving loading and its impact a lot more air time through the media.

I have a theory, but i know you don't like my theories so much, so if keen to know my response, you can read one of my previous posts that address that very question.

Edited by binman

Energy level go up and down for a variety of reasons and the loading talk has for whatever reason become the main talking point. 

You post too many times a day for me to trawl back through posts. And it's not even "a lot more" airtime. It's "any". 

Aside from Chris Scott talking about it, I haven't heard it talked about once from any relevant ex player and now commentator. Lewis, Reiwoldt, Montagna, Hodge, Watson etc etc. 

Why? 


  On 24/06/2022 at 03:44, JimmyGadson said:

Energy level go up and down for a variety of reasons and the loading talk has for whatever reason become the main talking point. 

You post too many times a day for me to trawl back through posts. And it's not even "a lot more" airtime. It's "any". 

Aside from Chris Scott talking about it, I haven't heard it talked about once from any relevant ex player and now commentator. Lewis, Reiwoldt, Montagna, Hodge, Watson etc etc. 

Why? 

https://demonland.com/forums/topic/53244-postgame-rd-15-vs-brisbane/?do=findComment&comment=2152755

  On 24/06/2022 at 00:09, CYB said:

I was at the game and i would say a good 20-25K were Brisbane supporters. We have been outnumbered again and it probably came through on the tele as well. 

I get its a Thursday night, but if it wasnt for the BCNA, i would suspect the crowd would have been 10-15K lower. 

Nah.

  On 23/06/2022 at 22:58, dee-tox said:

That brutality and bravery was prevalent on so many levels.

The courage Fritsch shows in the air is incredible for a guy his size and weight.

Lever's running with the flight spoils and marks.

Viney's kamikaze attack on the ball and the man. Toughest hombre in the comp.

Harmes' in and under work.

The gut running of Langdon and Jordon.

Petty's want to hurt opposition players in marking contests.

Jackson's tackling.

 

 

 

 

What about Oli's and Petraccas' ability to get their hands on the pill

Oli is a magician

We massively outnumbered them and made heaps more noise than them, just like against Sydney and freo. People really have been talking unmitigated rot about the crowds this year.

After the game last night I said why couldn't we have played like that against Collingwood. 

Anyway glad we found our mojo back & let it continue.


  On 24/06/2022 at 03:44, JimmyGadson said:

Energy level go up and down for a variety of reasons and the loading talk has for whatever reason become the main talking point. 

You post too many times a day for me to trawl back through posts. And it's not even "a lot more" airtime. It's "any". 

Aside from Chris Scott talking about it, I haven't heard it talked about once from any relevant ex player and now commentator. Lewis, Reiwoldt, Montagna, Hodge, Watson etc etc. 

Why? 

Buckley last week after Geelong mentioned it commented along the lines of ‘Geelong have chosen to put an extra load in over the last month and will have to endure the effects of that for the time being but it will hopefully hold them in good stead at the back end of the year’

What I loved about last night - it was clearly a statement win.  Not only for the rest of the league but also for Melbourne.  Yes, we started the year with 10 straight wins, but apart from the GWS game, none of them were what I would call Melbourne in its form.  They looked like they were coasting, barely getting out of second gear.  I wasn't necessarily worried, though because it's a long season, and it needs to be treated like a marathon, not a sprint.  

Then we lost to Freo.  Again, not worried, it was the loss the team needed to have, as a reality check.  The Sydney loss, though, was frustrating, because they could have played so much better.  The Collingwood game?  That one left me despondent.

But last night was a return to the form of 2021.  They didn't just win, they crushed.  That was a statement win.  

 

I heard Goody address it in his presser but the excitement & comaradarie was back. Probably didn't see it on the tv but when we kicked goals the backline fist pumped or clapped or the midfielders did the same thing & players got around each other more. 

  On 24/06/2022 at 03:25, binman said:

As for this point, it really interests me too why the 'experts' (many of whom have coached and played at the highest level) would be giving loading and its impact a lot more air time through the media.

I have a theory, but i know you don't like my theories so much, so if keen to know my response, you can read one of my previous posts that address that very question.

BM, apparently JG was a “high level player”, maybe you need to be an “elite level player” to understand what is going on? Who knows, but either way I wouldn’t waste your time arguing with him.

if he is waiting for Lewis, Riewoldt, Montagna, Hodge and Watson to provide him confirmation of what has been going on, he will probably catch on after this current group win their 3rd or 4th flag.

Thanks for your recent accurate analysis of what has been happening. “Elite” level content. 
 

 


There were a lot of Brisroy Bears supporters at a private function upstairs at the Tippler pre game. Some of them looked old enough to have been watching them when they were called the Gorillas. 

I was a little surprised to see the crowd number when it appeared on the screen as level 2 in the Olympic Stand was half empty again. The noise level was ok though. It wasn't exactly Ibrox on a european night but ok for us. 

  On 24/06/2022 at 05:10, leave it to deever said:

Great to see number 14 Hibbering opponents. again

Agree. Seeing him in the side always makes me feel a bit more confident.

 

I know I'm late to the party because almost everyone has mentioned it, but bloody hell Viney played a corker. Do you think he enjoys being the "leader of men"?

And Bedford looks to be playing himself into finals contention. He adds another dimension to our forward line.

Can we keep this up over the next few weeks to cement a top 2 spot? Would love to avoid Freo in Perf come the finals.

 
  On 24/06/2022 at 00:09, CYB said:

I was at the game and i would say a good 20-25K were Brisbane supporters. We have been outnumbered again and it probably came through on the tele as well. 

I get its a Thursday night, but if it wasnt for the BCNA, i would suspect the crowd would have been 10-15K lower. 

I'm aware you've been piled on already, but just wanted to say I watched the game on TV and the crowd sounded great: vocal and definitely pro-Melbourne. 

  On 23/06/2022 at 21:04, Nasher said:

I thought Michael Hibberd was finished - oops.

Agreed, but I gave him two years until the end of that bumpy road. Golly, it's good to consider on his current form a few more years than that ahead of him. What and energy-draining test it was against Brizzy! Flying colours come to mind on the quality of his efforts and results.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 91 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 40 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Like
    • 341 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Hawthorn

    After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 32 replies
    Demonland