So a candidate who is a multimillionaire with excessive resources can give themselves an unfair advantage to electioneer however way they like with things like billboards, full page ads in the paper, etc etc etc, even though they may be a [censored] candidate, over someone with minimal access to such resources, who couldn't possibly afford to compete to get the same level of exposure, but who could be a perfect candidate? Wouldn't that create the very result a lot of people are arguing against here? Way to promote the "rich boys club" DC. Besides, you can say a lot more in a 300 word statement than you can in an expensive full page colour ad in the Herald Sun.