Jump to content

Angus has to play Midfield...!

Deetention
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Carlton and Fremantle's midfield has gone to another level of dominance and depth... 

If the Dees are going to challenge for a Premiership. I am adamant Gus has to be playing predominantly as a midfielder. He can dominate this position. He is the Dees trump card...! 

  • Quote
    • Like 7
     

    I think I agree. We miss his defensive work on the wing and also he creates a fair few scoring chances

    Although he has been terrific down back we have our premiership defence back in and blokes like Rivers who can cover Gus.  He is important structurally for us too on the wing

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    I think so too. Jordon has been okay on the wing, but Brayshaw's ball movement is generally much better.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     

    Very good call.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    The real thing to point out here is that in no way is an ellipsis into an exclamation mark proper grammar. 

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Love 1
    • Haha 8

    Not always the most efficient field kick but he does lower the eyes. A move there could be what is needed. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    As a full time mid Gus gets his 30 but the opposition get 30 under far less pressure and use it better.

    There’s a good case to move him back to the wing and even rotate him in to the midfield from half forward.

    But there’s a good reason he doesn’t play in the centre square.

    He has more creativity by hand than JJ. Not sure his kicking is any better. He’s just as slow to move the ball and has twice the affinity for dumping it in the crowd 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
    • Angry 1

    Do you mean back to wing? Or in the centre?

    If it’s in the centre who goes out for him and where do they go? 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     

    I think play Gus on the wing and when clarry, trac, or viney go off he goes into the guts and JJ replaces him on the wing, because JJ has been solid on the wing and Gus is definetely better than backup mids at the moment.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I agree and think this will also set Salem free. Salem might have come back into the team a bit confused since Brayshaw has remained at half back, despite only being put there to cover Salem.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Nope. He’s been incredible in defence this year. He’s a very talented reader of the game and an excellent mark, so being behind the ball suits his strengths, and minimises his weaknesses.

    Whether folks like it or not we are a process driven team. You can want to swing Petty forward, put Gus on the ball, and try Weid in the backline all you want - but the club believes strongly in consistency of role. Last year when we struggled in the middle of the year did we swing the magnets? No, we gave players time to develop their craft and learn how to get better.

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    Gus is having his best year at HBF.

    Our woes in recent weeks have been due to our lack of forwards and losing key defenders in game.

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Thanks 2

    I agree, but it could be anyone of Bowey, Salem or Brayshaw who to tend be the best users of the ball. We need to improve our forward connection which means we need a better kick going in. 

    We bring Rivers back in to backfill Brayshaw. JJ and Lingers stay on the wings and we move Brayshaw into the HF / Midfield rotation. One of Sparrow / Harmes / ANB to make way. 

    Will this happen? No - i cannot see Goodwin pulling this move.

  • Quote
    7 minutes ago, Ben said:

    I agree and think this will also set Salem free. Salem might have come back into the team a bit confused since Brayshaw has remained at half back, despite only being put there to cover Salem.

    I think the entire balance of the backline has been off with Lever, Gus and Salem all came together.

    Thats 3 players who primarily ignore their opponents to intercept and/or distribute the ball.

    Which means the other 4 have a whole lot of defending to do.

    The best solution would be to drop Lever but we don’t have any fit 3rd talls available. So he has to stay. In which case I wonder if the balance comes back with Hunt or Rivers in, and we rely on Lever (and May and Petty) filling the intercepting void we lose with Gus in another role.

  • Quote

    Gus back on the wing makes more sense to me than him in the backline. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    A tough question to answer. Gus has been superb down back for us this year and I think Jordan has been one of our best players on the wing. He has played consistently well there. I can see why people want gus in the middle but this may be playing with the wrong horse. 

  • Quote

    Can we clone him 🤔

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1

    For periods yes, i think Gus should play wing and rotate through the midfield. I think we really need to increase rotations through that area to keep players fresh. 

    I also think we should look at Tracs forward/mid split, we might need him short term up front to give us a target

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Author

    Gus is a contested ball and clearance player... Needs to be placed at centre bounces and stoppages.

    I agree he is great in defence and on the wing... But if we are going to win the Premiership we need to dominate clearance and get first use to our forwards. Defending after repeat opposition entries will not hold up. 
     

    To answer he question, who does he replace. I think Petracca can play more of a forward role and rotate with Viney.

    Oliver and Angus to get most midfield  minutes. 

     

  • Quote

    Wouldn’t hurt to try him in the middle. But he is playing well down back. No real need to change that, he reads the play extremely well down there.

  • Quote

    This is a tactical move far too shrewd for Goodwin

    And I say this with a heavy heart 

    Edited by adonski

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Gus past few weeks have been outstanding in the back flank role, he's one of very few that have improved on last year's form. We'd have lost by several goals more in the past 3 losses without him playing this role.

    Not against him playing Mid but can't see Goody changing this current setup.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    13 minutes ago, KingDingAling said:

    Wouldn’t hurt to try him in the middle. But he is playing well down back. No real need to change that, he reads the play extremely well down there.

    Wouldn't hurt?

    He come 3rd in the Brownlow as a mid a few years ago.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    1 minute ago, Fork 'em said:

    Wouldn't hurt?

    He come 3rd in the Brownlow as a mid a few years ago.

    ...and he's probably in the running for AA honours as a half back this year.

  • Quote

    Those that say, "Gus is this, gus is that" are too narrow minded, Gus has proven that he can ADAPT and play multiple roles to a high level. It's not about where he plays his best footy, it's about where he makes us a better team. 

    He could play Mid/Wing/Back and do it as good if not better than some players currently are in those positions, but that doesn't answer what best suits the team. At the moment, the coaches clearly feel as though that's as a back. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • 17 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 232 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Angry
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All