Jump to content

NON-MFC: Round 11, 2022

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

I think the best way to evaluate the non-50 decision is like this

Given the umps paid no 50 - The AFL will back the umpires for using common sense...

If the umps had paid 50 - The AFL would have backed the umpires for paying the correct decision 

Clear? ...

You're welcome 😊 

Edited by Graeme Yeats' Mullet

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
     
    4 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

    That’s not the point. Viney was suspended because of the action and how it looked. The AFL want to protect the integrity of the game. Franklin threw a punch. If they are consistent, he gets a week at least

    I think DD was JK 🙂

  • Quote

    The umpire did an Engadine Macca's just then.

    Edited by Sigil

  • Quote
    • Haha 3
     
    7 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

    That’s not the point. Viney was suspended because of the action and how it looked. The AFL want to protect the integrity of the game. Franklin threw a punch. If they are consistent, he gets a week at least

    "If they are consistent, he gets a week at least". ... so he will get off then. 

    5 minutes ago, DubDee said:

    Dissent only exists when a free is paid against you in the AFLs eyes

    Brad Scott should be worried about his mid season performance review 😂

    Not so sure ... there was a free against Tigers earlier in the game when they dissented about a non decision, as I recall

  • Quote

    Franklin punch will be interesting. If it was say a Melbourne CHF like TMAC or the weed then they would get 3 weeks minimum but because it is Buddy nothing may happen. If we lose to freo he may get a week but if we beat freo he will play for sure. That is how disgusting the AFL can be.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Vomit 1

    11 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

    That’s not the point. Viney was suspended because of the action and how it looked. The AFL want to protect the integrity of the game. Franklin threw a punch. If they are consistent, he gets a week at least

    It’s ok - tomorrow morning Auskickers can smack a 9 year old twice in the head

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
    12 minutes ago, mo64 said:

    The clock stops when the ball goes out of bounce, and a 50 can be paid. The siren sounding is irrelevant.

    Clock stops when umpire signals time on

  • Quote
    17 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

    That’s not the point. Viney was suspended because of the action and how it looked. The AFL want to protect the integrity of the game. Franklin threw a punch. If they are consistent, he gets a week at least

    Ho, Ho, ho, how consistency and AFL align!??? Nar not even remotely close!  as the Robot in lost in space would say... "It does not Compute"

    But Coz its Buddy...... Nar Nothing to see here, gets of and plays next week. BANK ON IT!

    Edited by picket fence

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
    • Angry 1
     
    15 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

    I tell you who’s about to get robbed after that. Me and everyone else that needs Prestia for 25+ possessions in a multi, they still haven’t added his kick after the siren onto his stats.

    Prestia for a goal was good money too tonight, wish I had it!

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Ha the Richmond fans are ringing up SEN complaining that if it was any other team that would have been paid 50 but because it was Richmond it wasn't paid

  • Quote
    16 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    I think DD was JK 🙂

    200.gif

  • Quote
    35 minutes ago, Trisul said:

    The match was live.

    The match was over...the only action you can take after the siren is your kick if it was awarded before the siren.

    Honestly I don't know if this is fact but pretty sure we will find out over the next few days.

    There was a reason the ump was on the mic to someone upstairs. My guess is to confirm the timing.

    Once confirmed, it was game over...go back & have your kick.

    Edited by rjay

  • Quote

    6 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    That should have been a 50 metre penalty every day of the week.

    Well actually no.

    The 50 is given for time wasting, running off the mark, dissent or a further infringement against the team with the free kick.

    None of those existed.

    There is no time wasting, as the siren went and he gets his kick no matter. If it happened in the game yes of course, but no time was wasted.

    As the umpire said it was a commonsense decision.

    Also, to get the look on Reiwoldt's face it was absolutely the correct decision.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Haha 5
    5 minutes ago, rjay said:

    The match was over...the only action you can take after the siren is your kick if it was awarded before the siren.

    Honestly I don't know if this is fact but pretty sure we will find out over the next few days.

    There was a reason the ump was on the mic to someone upstairs. My guess is to confirm the timing.

    on the phone to gillom probably

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Well actually no.

    The 50 is given for time wasting, running off the mark, dissent or a further infringement against the team with the free kick.

    None of those existed.

    There is no time wasting, as the siren went and he gets his kick no matter. If it happened in the game yes of course, but no time was wasted.

    As the umpire said it was a commonsense decision.

    Also, to get the look on Reiwoldt's face it was absolutely the correct decision.

     

    You know the umps are sticklers for rules. If someone marked 40m out and the siren went and an oppo player kicked the ball away, you honestly think they would pay a 50?

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Make up your own mind. Was kicking the ball into the stands classed as an unsportsmanlike manner?

     FIFTY METRE PENALTY
    19.1 SPIRIT AND INTENTION
    After a Mark or Free Kick has been awarded to a Player, a Fifty Metre Penalty will be awarded against the opposing Team which delays or impedes the play, or behaves in an unsportsmanlike manner

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    14 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    That should have been a 50 metre penalty every day of the week.

    couldn't disagree more

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    If the player on the mark steps forward over the mark a 50 would be paid even if the siren had gone before the kick.  No?

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Look at the discipline of our interchange  boys when T Mac took his after siren kick in the GF - did not celebrate on ground unti “all clear” was given. 
    Under the old rule, 10 years ago, Footscray could have been awarded the Premiership for a violation there 

  • Quote
    •  
    2 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

    Make up your own mind. Was kicking the ball into the stands classed as an unsportsmanlike manner?

     FIFTY METRE PENALTY
    19.1 SPIRIT AND INTENTION
    After a Mark or Free Kick has been awarded to a Player, a Fifty Metre Penalty will be awarded against the opposing Team which delays or impedes the play, or behaves in an unsportsmanlike manner

    No... and after the siren there is no time to be wasted.   Nothing to see here

  • Quote

    I mean forget mean happened. Theres 6 seconds left at that throw in, I'd be surprised if the Swans players didn't know this. Did they really have to hold? I think the free kick was dicey but why even put doubt in the umpires mind?

    I also love it how we're so mortified that someone boots a ball into the stands and pay 50s for it because they can't get it back to the player quickly yet if someone boots a behind into the stands we have ball boys like lightening throwing another ball to the kick in guy to keep play going :p

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Haha
      • 98 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 31 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

        • Like
      • 252 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Port Adelaide

      Max Gawn has an insurmountable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzy Pickett. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Sad
        • Like
      • 32 replies
      Demonland
    View All