Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 hours ago, Jontee said:

Ah not quite.  Cerra didnt beleive the club could organise the swap so picked Carlton, even though the Dees said Just leave that to us.  (Must have wanted out real bad)

Probably didn't want the drama and choose the easiest route 

Also Blues may have guaranteed him more midfield time. 

 

Carlton had been courting Cerra long before we made our late bid. He gave us the courtesy of a meeting, but ultimately was never coming to the Demons. People saying that he wanted to play for us, but we couldn't get a deal done is nonsense. 

 

12 hours ago, mo64 said:

Carlton had been courting Cerra long before we made our late bid. He gave us the courtesy of a meeting, but ultimately was never coming to the Demons. People saying that he wanted to play for us, but we couldn't get a deal done is nonsense. 

 

It didn't look nonsensical on the "Show me the money" doco on Stan mo.

 
10 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

It didn't look nonsensical on the "Show me the money" doco on Stan mo.

As Clarko said this week, most deals are organized well before the season ends. All the talk prior to trade week was that he was going to Carlton. I think we were late to the party.

If you look at the trade rumours this year, most players are already linked to a club. There are some exceptions, but most pan out as predicted.

17 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

I think Carlton would be more than happy with what Cerra has given them and what he will be giving them in future. Their midfield finally began to look like a coherent unit, with a number of previously questionable players now giving a much more complete contribution. Cerra's all-round good midfield game has helped that happen.

On the other hand, I feel like if we had got him, the price might have been more than the value. Not because of anything wrong with him so much as because there is a lot 'right' with us already!

Speaking of midfielders and their usefulness in different circumstances: you have to feel a bit for Luke Dunstan. He's played half as many games this season as he had Brownlow votes last season!

I can't help wondering if he might 'do a Preuss' and rotate onwards to another club for better opportunities. 

He is on record as saying he hated playing at St Kilda and would have left to play somewhere for fun.

The fact he is at the Dees (as insurance largely)  - and opportunities haven't been plentiful for him - is possibly annoying for him but I reckon he is at peace with his decision..

And he still has some flaws in his game despite getting Brownlow votes...


13 hours ago, mo64 said:

Carlton had been courting Cerra long before we made our late bid. He gave us the courtesy of a meeting, but ultimately was never coming to the Demons. People saying that he wanted to play for us, but we couldn't get a deal done is nonsense. 

 

In the end we don't know for sure why he knocked us back ... he may have been polite or just want the blues to lift their offer when he met us ... doesn't matter in the end ... what is fact however is that he will be envious of the teams playing finals especially ones that go deep into September ... that's us

  • 6 months later...

Bump

 

Had we the draft capital and the ability to trade for and to secure Adam Cerra at the end of 2021, would you consider the value he’s currently giving Carlton would be sufficient if he came to with us?

28 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Bump

 

Had we the draft capital and the ability to trade for and to secure Adam Cerra at the end of 2021, would you consider the value he’s currently giving Carlton would be sufficient if he came to with us?

Feel we dodged a bullet.

Haven’t seen his stats tonight but felt he didn’t get heaps of it and had little influence on the game. Even last year when he was racking up possessions it didn’t feel like he was hurting sides.

 

Would rather Lachie Hunters delivery into our forward line.

Noticed Saad a lot tonight too, though not for many good reasons (he made a nice spoil, but my gosh he can stuff up the play in peculiar ways).

Lots of basic errors in tonight’s game (which I suppose can be expected), but neither gave the impression of being a top 4 team on tonight’s performance. 

Still, glad that footy is back. If only the Dees and Dogs could attract a crowd of 88k.


12 minutes ago, adonski said:

A James Jordon type with slightly better athletic traits 

Tend to agree, pretty accurate.
So based on this, you would have to agree that Carlton paid over 

4 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Tend to agree, pretty accurate.
So based on this, you would have to agree that Carlton paid over 

Certainly looking that way 

Hes ultimately a very expensive role player

Edited by adonski

6 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Tend to agree, pretty accurate.
So based on this, you would have to agree that Carlton paid over 

Yes, but he would've benefited under our development system. He won't under Carlton's, too cruisy. He's a very good player wasting his career

Edited by Stiff Arm

3 minutes ago, adonski said:

Certainly looking that way 

Hes ultimately a very expensive role player

Isn’t everyone a ‘role player’ nowadays?

Sliding doors, revisionist look of course but some players role much larger. 
 

It doesn’t seem that Carlton are using him like they sold it to him. 


I was at tonight's game at it was frankly a bit bizarre.

Not many players can come out of that very happy with their game. Maybe Weitering and Cripps for Carlton and Rioli for Richmond. Several players who did a lot of good things also really [...] the bed at critical moments.

That said, Cerra was barely visible to me, and Carlton really needed some spread of clearance work.

I liken it to us when we traded for Lever. 
Seemed overs at the time with Lever but Cerra seemed more reasonable. 
Just another example of how we don’t really know what might happen 

9 hours ago, adonski said:

A James Jordon type with slightly better athletic traits 

Pretty much. Very good athletic traits mind you but give me Hunter's skills. 

He’s definitely an interesting one (along with Jack Martin)

A lot of Individual flair is taken away in the modern game as everything is system based. They don’t possess any standout traits to allow them to express themselves properly on top of the ‘system’

Don’t think he is suited to the role Carlton are playing him in, he’s not an inside player

Edited by BW511


9 hours ago, adonski said:

Certainly looking that way 

Hes ultimately a very expensive role player

Carltons million dollar dud squad includes Cerra, Martin, and Saad! 

1 minute ago, picket fence said:

Carltons million dollar dud squad includes Cerra, Martin, and Saad! 

I thought Saad probably cost them the game last night, he panicked on a few occasions in the last 5 mins

Edited by BW511

1 minute ago, BW511 said:

I thought Saad probably cost them the game last night, he panicked on a few occasions in the last 5 mins

Yep wonderful to see wasn't it?🤣

 
10 hours ago, McQueen said:

Bump

 

Had we the draft capital and the ability to trade for and to secure Adam Cerra at the end of 2021, would you consider the value he’s currently giving Carlton would be sufficient if he came to with us?

No, but I can see why we wanted him, penetrating kick.

9 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

Not many players can come out of that very happy with their game. Maybe Weitering and Cripps for Carlton and Rioli for Richmond. Several players who did a lot of good things also really [...] the bed at critical moments.

That said, Cerra was barely visible to me, and Carlton really needed some spread of clearance work.

Thought Lynch got the better of Waitering in the second half and obviously had a major impact on the result.

With regards to Cerra, Kane Cornes went on a rant about him last week and clearly believes that he's an overrated disappointment.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 248 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies