Jump to content

Featured Replies

16 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Seriously for 10,000 people we are robbing Melbourne of the clear advantage of playing at the MCG?! What a joke. 

AFL got sold a lemon with this one. Got sucked right in. 

And to think Adelaide are pushing their case for a GF gig when they won't even put it up to 50% capacity for its first final.

 
8 hours ago, At the break of Gawn said:

100% agree with this. 15k all spaced out across the stadium is going to deliver very little atmosphere. This isn’t much better than playing at the G in an empty stadium.

I attended the women’s match when they made the prelim last year at Adelaide oval, from memory there was about 20,000 that day.  The ironic thing was that they didn’t spread the crowd all over the ground.  Everyone of us were on the lower deck wing on one side of the ground.  I was crammed in shoulder to shoulder next to everyone else.  They put a tokenistic spare row every 5 or so rows, but that was the extent of the social distancing. 

Im sure more value was put on it looking good on tv, and reducing security costs than the health and well being of the patrons.

However, I have to disagree with you, I think there will be an atmosphere and the players have consistently said they prefer some crowd to no crowd.  I’m at least partially hopeful that we might outnumber the opposition supporters and give the boys a lift if they need it.

  • Author
24 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

AFL got sold a lemon with this one. Got sucked right in. 

And to think Adelaide are pushing their case for a GF gig when they won't even put it up to 50% capacity for its first final.

There's no way the AFL didn't know.

They've known what's going on with crowds and restrictions often before the public is informed.

I hope Gerard Whateley is happy. 

 
  • Author

We can now finalise the top 8's record vs the top 8:

  1. Melbourne: 8-2
  2. Sydney: 6-3
  3. GWS: 5-5
  4. Port Adelaide: 4-4
  5. Brisbane: 4-4 (note that they played 7 of these 8 games by Round 12, before their bye)
  6. Geelong: 4-5
  7. Bulldogs: 4-5
  8. Essendon: 1-8
  • Author

And the top 8's record vs the top 4:

  1. Melbourne: 4-0
  2. Bulldogs: 3-3
  3. Brisbane: 2-2
  4. Sydney: 2-2
  5. Geelong: 2-3
  6. GWS: 2-3
  7. Port Adelaide: 0-3
  8. Essendon: 0-4

My question is to the AFL & understand cover/quarantine etc but why does Port get to play in front of a home crowd/home ground and the Demons minor premiers have to travel, Were is the advantage finishing 1st???

Was there an option of having a bye to move all the finals to Perth and fit in with their quarantine, they also have Subiaco oval???

7 other teams are plying on Neutral Grounds, how is this fair???

Edited by Demonsone

26 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

We can now finalise the top 8's record vs the top 8:

  1. Melbourne: 8-2
  2. Sydney: 6-3
  3. GWS: 5-5
  4. Port Adelaide: 4-4
  5. Brisbane: 4-4 (note that they played 7 of these 8 games by Round 12, before their bye)
  6. Geelong: 4-5
  7. Bulldogs: 4-5
  8. Essendon: 1-8

Not only have we won this stat by a mile, we also played the most amount of games against the top 8 sides along with GWS. 

Gotta wonder how that happened considering we didn't even make the 8 last year! 

12 hours ago, Nascent said:

My main concern about this game is Brisbanes dangerous small forwards in Cameron, McCarthy and Bailey.

Rivers, Bowey and Smith are a lot of youth and inexperience that could be exposed here. Do we bring in Hibberd to play a hard lockdown role?

I would 100% agree with you. I rate Bailey very highly and Cameron on his day is a match winner. Smith for Hibberd would be my choice. But having said that Smith is a better match up on Cameron due to his athletic ability

 
15 minutes ago, Demonsone said:

My question is to the AFL & understand cover/quarantine etc but why does Port get to play in front of a home crowd/home ground and the Demons minor premiers have to travel, Were is the advantage finishing 1st???

Was there an option of having a bye to move all the finals to Perth and fit in with their quarantine, they also have Subiaco oval???

7 other teams are plying on Neutral Grounds, how is this fair???

It's not really fair but neither is interstate teams having to beat Melbourne ones at the MCG on grabs final day . I'm not too fussed with it

Reckon Melbourne will ask for videos from supporters wishing them luck??

I feel like there’s no real way to show them support with us vic fans not being there and cheering them,

although they know we are watching and yes SA fans will be there. Hopefully I few videos from fans before the game can rev them up some more with knowing how many of us are behind them

Edited by Demongirl35


I’m gutted I cant go and see my beloved Demons in the finals and so are my kids , but as I said to them, this team is good enough to have prolonged success and hopefully we will see many more finals back at the G in the coming years.

As one of our recruiters told me in a private conversation a couple of years ago. “ This groups got 2 , maybe 3 flags in them”.

Tha gave me a lot of hope.

Edited by DeeZee

2 hours ago, Demonsone said:

My question is to the AFL & understand cover/quarantine etc but why does Port get to play in front of a home crowd/home ground and the Demons minor premiers have to travel, Were is the advantage finishing 1st???

Was there an option of having a bye to move all the finals to Perth and fit in with their quarantine, they also have Subiaco oval???

7 other teams are plying on Neutral Grounds, how is this fair???

 

 

The Crows didnt complain when they finished higher and played Richmond at the G in a GF.

Given the current circumstances I dont see what the problem is. 

 

  • Author
2 hours ago, Jaded said:

Not only have we won this stat by a mile, we also played the most amount of games against the top 8 sides along with GWS. 

Gotta wonder how that happened considering we didn't even make the 8 last year! 

We were given repeat games against Geelong (2020 runner up), Bulldogs (2020 finalist but finished in the middle six), GWS (10th in 2020), Hawthorn (bottom 4 in 2020) and Adelaide (bottom 4 in 2020).

It wasn't that bad - GWS ended up moving up into the top 8.

What's interesting is that Port and Brisbane both made prelims last year but only had one repeat game against a 2021 finalist. Port got two repeat games against 2020 top 6 sides but not only were they the two worst top 6 sides from 2020 in Collingwood and St Kilda (losers of the two semi finals), but both of them fell apart in 2021 and missed finals. They otherwise got the Bulldogs (a 2020 finalist but finished middle six), and Carlton and Adelaide.

Brisbane got both Richmond and Geelong (i.e. the two Grand Finalists) plus Collingwood, Gold Coast and Fremantle. Again, whilst that looked reasonably tough pre-season, Richmond and Collingwood fell apart and GC and Fremantle were always going to be mid to poor sides.


I'm not convinced we play better at the MCG than Adelaide Oval.  If I had my pick for us to win I'd play at Docklands.

3 hours ago, Demonsone said:

My question is to the AFL & understand cover/quarantine etc but why does Port get to play in front of a home crowd/home ground and the Demons minor premiers have to travel, Were is the advantage finishing 1st???

Was there an option of having a bye to move all the finals to Perth and fit in with their quarantine, they also have Subiaco oval???

7 other teams are plying on Neutral Grounds, how is this fair???

Anywhere, Anytime, Anybody 

and Subiaco has no stands anymore just the oval and the heritage gates remain 

3 hours ago, Demonsone said:

My question is to the AFL & understand cover/quarantine etc but why does Port get to play in front of a home crowd/home ground and the Demons minor premiers have to travel, Were is the advantage finishing 1st???

Was there an option of having a bye to move all the finals to Perth and fit in with their quarantine, they also have Subiaco oval???

7 other teams are plying on Neutral Grounds, how is this fair???

Nothing to see here.

By the way, who is the broadcaster again and do they have any club presidents in their employ? Asking for a friend.

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

It was a bit confusing on the first read but basically Brisbane is the only team not to have played another Final 8 team in the last 8 rounds of this year.

 

Whereas since Rnd 15 we have played 5 top 8 sides (Bombers, GWS, Port, Dogs and Cats). Six if you include the Eagles in Perth who were in the 8 at the time. It has to be better to have that run than a whole lot of easy games, doesn’t it?

Edited by FarNorthernD


They won't get 10,000 irrespective of crowd capacity.

Who's going to be that fussed on attending a game with two out of town teams? Who has the discretionary cash to pay 50-$100 to watch a game that your club isn't involved in.

With that being said, I think we're as good a chance winning a game at AO than MCG.  Our form at the G after the Carlton game was pretty uninspiring.

14 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

Success I'm there Sat night.

How did you do it? I'm currently battling Ticketek, but without much success. (I live in Adelaide, lucky me!) It doesn't seem to want to let me book tickets, even though I'm putting in the right barcode numbers. Are we supposed to select General Admission, which seems to be restricted to just a couple of small bays? Or do we select the other option, Home/Club 1 members? I would have thought that since this is not a Crows/Port match, the usual "keep the other bastards out" rules wouldn't apply. Anyone been through the exercise successfully? 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 134 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 407 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies