Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, A F said:

Agreed. Very worried about this game.

Genuinely think we will drop this one. Hoping I’m wrong.

Ā 
1 hour ago, Cards13 said:

He’s an average player at best, his strength is one on one contests otherwise he’s terrible.Ā 

On The Couch ripped Liam Jones apart the other night. Great one on one defensively but if he refuses to adhere to the structure again this week we will walk goals in.

 
4 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

On The Couch ripped Liam Jones apart the other night. Great one on one defensively but if he refuses to adhere to the structure again this week we will walk goals in.

Yea lol that is the one I just found. I love his story as he was just derided during g his dogs stint and he was able to turn into an ok defender with moments of brilliance.Ā 


2 hours ago, Brownie said:

Yep, saw him lots of times just trying to get a run at the ball and just being scragged.

He did alright last week and he'll learn to beat those tags. He's just too goodĀ 

If they tag Kossy too hard it mess Spargo should have a better Ā game, he might also step into Kossys taggerĀ 

hard player hard tackler not very tall

I like the way he plays. Both of em !

4 hours ago, Superunknown said:

The line with the bookies is instructive. +24.5 Carlton 1.90.

$3.00 MFC at -38.5

$7 for -60.5....

$4 for -47.5

Ā 

Ā 

Can you explain to me in simple terms what this means ??Ā 

Ā I don't do ' At the line ' speakĀ 

4 hours ago, A F said:

Agreed. Very worried about this game.

I was there last week AF, Ā but I can’t see the Blues bringing 4 QTEQ of heat.

That said, I remember 2016-2017 when we should have belted them but didn’t.

Ā 
52 minutes ago, pineapple dee said:

Can you explain to me in simple terms what this means ??Ā 

Ā I don't do ' At the line ' speakĀ 

If the line is MFC -38.5 paying $3 it means Melbourne has to win by at least 39 points for you to win the bet and it will pay 3-1 odds (so you win $3 for every dollar you bet)

If Carlton is +24.5 and paying $1.90 it means for you to win your bet Carlton has to either win or lose by 24 points or less and your payout is $1.90 for every dollar you bet

Edited by Dr. Gonzo

9 hours ago, hardtack said:

Can you please organise a live stream?

Sure but first I’ll have to buyĀ a hat.Ā 

Edited by Chook


2 hours ago, Beetle said:

Genuinely think we will drop this one. Hoping I’m wrong.

nah - we've forgotten how to lose

Ā Peter ā€œJohnnoā€ Johnson mad bluebagger has put $100 on the blues. Reckons the upset is on and put his cash in. Ā Still arrogant even after their crap run over the past few years. Ā Let’s rub it in their snug faces. Go DeesĀ 

1 minute ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Ā Peter ā€œJohnnoā€ Johnson mad bluebagger has put $100 on the blues. Reckons the upset is on and put his cash in. Ā Still arrogant even after their crap run over the past few years. Ā Let’s rub it in their snug faces. Go DeesĀ 

Woweee- why does this [censored] matter?

Carlton 2021 is Melbourne 2016. A good average team. We beat a 1st placed Hawthorn in 2016 deep into the season.Ā Ā 

We have had three bruising encounters and Carlton can look quite good when they're switched on. They lack defensive awareness as a team but they're no easy beats and will be going for blood after folding against the Dogs. Lots of pressure and talk on them this week.

I think we are much better than them but anything can happen. Tbh wouldn't be surprised if we lose this week.Ā 

4 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

I was there last week AF, Ā but I can’t see the Blues bringing 4 QTEQ of heat.

That said, I remember 2016-2017 when we should have belted them but didn’t.

I think this is where my concern is coming from.Ā 


4 hours ago, Engorged Onion said:

Woweee- why does this [censored] matter?

Should tell the boys pregame about this PeterĀ "Johno" Johnston [censored]. That will fire them up.

1 hour ago, A F said:

I think this is where my concern is coming from.Ā 

My concern is from about 2004.
Eyeing off top4 and lost toĀ them twice during the season.
They were bottom of the ladder but we had no answer forĀ Fevola.

We've got a mounting injury list.
Tomlinson, Viney, Jackson out and not sure what sort of shape Petracca's in after his corky.
But they have their concerns with Cripps and if were as good as we think we should roll 'em regardless.
But I've never been one to go counting the chooks.
Been following this club too long for that.
Ā 

Ā 

Edited by Fork 'em

11 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

My concern is from about 2004.
Eyeing off top4 and lost toĀ them twice during the season.
They were bottom of the ladder but we had no answer forĀ Fevola.

Ā 

**** me I’d managed to block that from myĀ memories. I absolutely remember watching us drop those matches and recalling how it burned our top 4 hopes.Ā 

Just now, Pates said:

**** me I’d managed to block that from myĀ memories. I absolutely remember watching us drop those matches and recalling how it burned our top 4 hopes.Ā 

If only I could have.
That game and the following ones to the end of the season disgusted me at the time.
I think in the second game rd18 or so a win against bottom side Carlton would have given us top spot and a guaranteed top4.
Then we spudded up, lost the remainder of games, fell into the finals and got booted the 1st week.
It was everything I hated about the club at the time.
We were so up and down.
It was like as soon as theyĀ did enough toĀ guaranteeĀ a finals spotĀ they got lazy and took their foot off the accelerator.

Ā 

4 hours ago, Fork 'em said:

If only I could have.
That game and the following ones to the end of the season disgusted me at the time.
I think in the second game rd18 or so a win against bottom side Carlton would have given us top spot and a guaranteed top4.
Then we spudded up, lost the remainder of games, fell into the finals and got booted the 1st week.
It was everything I hated about the club at the time.
We were so up and down.
It was like as soon as theyĀ did enough toĀ guaranteeĀ a finals spotĀ they got lazy and took their foot off the accelerator.

Ā 

Slight correction. I believe the year you are referring to is 2006.

We actually rolled them at the G by 100 in our first fixture. We then played them at Princes Park with our chances to go top 4 still very much real.

Despite them being bog ordinary and made up of also rans from other clubs, we proceeded to poo the bed and lose by 5 goals.
Ā 


14 hours ago, Beetle said:

Genuinely think we will drop this one. Hoping I’m wrong.

You sayĀ  that about every game, go back into your box

8 hours ago, A F said:

I think this is where my concern is coming from.Ā 

Yes Mr president of the MFCSS, how far do you want to go to find a reason to sh on the demons

Edited by don't make me angry

2 hours ago, Colin B. Flaubert said:

Slight correction. I believe the year you are referring to is 2006.

We actually rolled them at the G by 100 in our first fixture. We then played them at Princes Park with our chances to go top 4 still very much real.

Despite them being bog ordinary and made up of also rans from other clubs, we proceeded to poo the bed and lose by 5 goals.
Ā 

Nah, you are right about the 1st 100pt win andĀ thatĀ was 2004.

And the year I am referring to was 2006
Both Carlton games played at telstra.
Both loses when they were wooden spooners.
The year we beat the Aints in the Elim.
Again stunk it up in the latter part of the season though.

My memory obviously muddled with all the frustration.
There was so much of it.
But I was at the second game late in the seasonĀ at 'Telstra' leaving disgusted.Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 
1 hour ago, Fork 'em said:

Nah, you are right about the 1st 100pt win andĀ thatĀ was 2004.

And the year I am referring to was 2006
Both Carlton games played at telstra.
Both loses when they were wooden spooners.
The year we beat the Aints in the Elim.
Again stunk it up in the latter part of the season though.

My memory obviously muddled with all the frustration.
There was so much of it.
But I was at the second game late in the seasonĀ at 'Telstra' leaving disgusted.Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

It was round 1 2006 that I left disgusted. Carlton won 3 games for the season, 2 of them were against us! It cost us top 4.

We also lost to them late in 2004 at Princes Park after topping the ladder in round 18 against Hawthorn. I was working that day and remember being in utter shock when I checked the scores.

I was chatting to a couple of blues supporting mates and i think there is seriously a CFCSS situation going on. one expects them to lose by plenty, the other things they'll dominate the game, have all the running and choke in the last 10 minutes and lose.Ā 

i said i was fine with either, but would like to win by a bit as last week was a bit hectic.Ā 

they both can't stand teague and think the club is covering up a pretty significant injury to CrippsĀ 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 12

    Round 12 kicks off with the Brisbane hosting Essendon at the Gabba as the Lions aim to solidify their top-two position against an injury-hit Bombers side seeking to maintain momentum after a win over Richmond. On Friday night it's a blockbuster at the G as the Magpies look to extend their top of the table winning streak while the Hawks strive to bounce back from a couple of recent defeats and stay in contention for the Top 4. On Saturday the Suns, buoyed by 3 wins on the trot, face the Dockers in a clash crucial for both teams' aspirations this season. The Suns want to solidify their Top 4 standing whilst the Dockers will be desperate to break into the 8.

      • Like
    • 43 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    The media has performed a complete reversal in its coverage of the Melbourne Football Club over the past month and a half. Having endured intense criticism from all quarters in the press, which continually identified new avenues for scrutiny of every aspect, both on and off the field, and prematurely speculated about the departures of coaches, players, officials, and various employees from a club that lost its first five matches and appeared out of finals contention, the narrative has suddenly shifted to one of unbridled optimism.Ā  The Demons have won five of their last six matches, positioning themselves just one game (and a considerable amount of percentage) outside the top eight at the halfway mark of the season. They still trail the primary contenders and remain far from assured of a finals berth.

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 12 replies
  • REPORT: Sydney

    A few weeks ago, I visited a fellow Melbourne Football Club supporter in hospital, and our conversation inevitably shifted from his health diagnosis to the well-being of our football team. Like him, Melbourne had faced challenges in recent months, but an intervention - in his case, surgery, and in the team's case, a change in game style - had brought about much improvement.Ā  The team's professionals had altered its game style from a pedestrian and slow-moving approach, which yielded an average of merely 60 points for five winless games, to a faster and more direct style. This shift led to three consecutive wins and a strong competitive effort in the fourth game, albeit with a tired finish against Hawthorn, a strong premiership contender.Ā  As we discussed our team's recent health improvement, I shared my observations on the changes within the team, including the refreshed style, the introduction of new young talent, such as rising stars Caleb Windsor, Harvey Langford, and Xavier Lindsay, and the rebranding of Kozzy Pickett from a small forward to a midfield machine who can still get among the goals. I also highlighted the dominance of captain Max Gawn in the ruck and the resurgence in form in a big way of midfield superstars Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver.Ā 

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 9 replies
  • PODCAST: Sydney

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 26th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a crushing victory by the Demons over the Swans at the G. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.

      • Like
    • 51 replies
  • POSTGAME: Sydney

    The Demons controlled the contest from the outset, though inaccurate kicking kept the Swans in the game until half time. But after the break, Melbourne put on the jets and blew Sydney away and the demolition job was complete.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 428 replies
  • VOTES: Sydney

    Max Gawn still has an almost unassailable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award. Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Harvey Langford, Kade Chandler & Ed Langdon round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 46 replies