Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

No, by majority of supporters. 

We're all happy he's getting an opportunity but from a playing perspective he absolutely doesn't have a spot in our forward line ahead of JVR or Petty.

Even Ben Brown Brown who's played less gamed then Weideman this has kicked more goals then him still.

He's good bloke but.

Well that’s a better way of putting it. I just think “he won’t be missed” is a little harsh, but I’ll forgive you. 😊

What I won’t forgive is your choice to end a sentence with a conjunction.  Hard limit. 😁

 

Hows Jackson going ?

Are we missing him yet?

Ever looked at how players celebrate after kicking a goal. A good example was this week Daicos and Jackson and Nibbler.

Draw your own conclusions.

 
On 4/25/2023 at 4:47 PM, Dee-monic said:

The Weid in a nutshell: A+ for character, A- for ability, B for consistency. If he can improve on the third category he still has an AFL future. Just sad that it wouldn't be with Melbourne.

His issue has always been competitiveness and appetite for the contest. He has everything else. The issue is they’re pretty big things at the highest level. 

4 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

What I won’t forgive is your choice to end a sentence with a conjunction.  Hard limit. 😁

English teacher?


1 hour ago, rjay said:

English teacher?

Proofreader. 😊

I am glad that Sam is getting a game and contributing, I watch all ex- Dee players and hope most do well at their new clubs, but not all (Scully,Jacko).

18 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Well that’s a better way of putting it. I just think “he won’t be missed” is a little harsh, but I’ll forgive you. 😊

What I won’t forgive is your choice to end a sentence with a conjunction.  Hard limit. 😁

Are you also concerned with the rule about finishing sentences with prepositions? Is that something else you won't put up with? 🙂

 
15 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Proofreader. 😊

No good to me after half a bottle, those were the days....

  • 2 months later...

He's had to unfortunately delete his instagram account again (did this back in 2019).

Starting to question whether Scott is doing the right thing for his mental health simply by playing him when he's horribly out of form.

I also do worry if AFL footy is for him. We know once he drops his head that's it for him and he struggles to fight his way out of it.

Saw some pretty horrible and personal comments last night from Bombers supporters on social media directed at Weideman.

Needs a good 4 weeks at VFL level just to get back enjoying footy again because on observation last night he's not enjoying it one bit.

Edited by dazzledavey36

2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

He's had to unfortunately delete his instagram account again (did this back in 2019).

Starting to question whether Scott is doing the right thing for his mental health simply by playing him when he's horribly out of form. I also do worry is AFL footy is for him. We know once he drops his head that's it for him and he struggles to fight his way out of it.

Saw some pretty horrible and personal comments last night from Bombers supporters on social media directed at Weideman.

Needs a good 4 weeks at VFL level just to get back enjoying footy again because on observation last night he's not enjoying it one bit.

As everyone knows. I have always been a  doubter on Sam from very early on. I feel very sorrow for him. I hope he gives it away and finds other things in life. There are lots Sam  

The footy industry is brutal, so many entitled people out there all too happy to ignore the fact that AFL footballers are human too. There are a lot of examples of players coming out of the system quite damaged as a result of constant criticism with no way of escaping it.

I like Weideman and I hope things turn for him.

It’s all about the frames of reference isn’t it?

He’s actually an incredibly talented footballer. To play 75 games of AFL footy you have to be. I know people who were extraordinary talented as juniors and were in National representative teams, who ended up on lists and never played a game. 

If he’s the kind of person who enjoys the process and the battle then it doesn’t really matter what the outside world thinks. If he’s the kind of person who is prone to view things through the prism of other people’s expectations, and evaluate himself against that, then that’s a really hard spot to be in. Interestingly this is true for all of us. You can always be a failure or a success. It’s how you frame it for yourself that defines it.

The sad reality is that a lot of the criticism would come from people who actually don’t achieve much in life. Once you’ve climbed a mountain you usually have a lot of respect for the mountain itself, and the other climbers. It’s easy to sit in Basecamp and think ‘I could do that, and those climbers are all doing it wrong’.


Unfortunately the Bombers fans are turning on him already. Jeers.  Laughter. Oh no moments.  Even the sharp new haircut hasn’t helped. He’s goalkicking has gotten worse imv.  He’s a great young man.  You couldn’t wish to meet a nicer bloke.  I hope he can put together a few more improved efforts to show he’s capable (even if it’s in red and black ). 

9 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

It’s all about the frames of reference isn’t it?

He’s actually an incredibly talented footballer. To play 75 games of AFL footy you have to be. I know people who were extraordinary talented as juniors and were in National representative teams, who ended up on lists and never played a game. 

If he’s the kind of person who enjoys the process and the battle then it doesn’t really matter what the outside world thinks. If he’s the kind of person who is prone to view things through the prism of other people’s expectations, and evaluate himself against that, then that’s a really hard spot to be in. Interestingly this is true for all of us. You can always be a failure or a success. It’s how you frame it for yourself that defines it.

The sad reality is that a lot of the criticism would come from people who actually don’t achieve much in life. Once you’ve climbed a mountain you usually have a lot of respect for the mountain itself, and the other climbers. It’s easy to sit in Basecamp and think ‘I could do that, and those climbers are all doing it wrong’.

"Incredibly talented footballer" is a bit of a stretch to be honest.

I accepted a while ago that I thought he was a good honest footballer who really does try his heart out, but still lacked the basics that you needed to take the next step of being a good key forward. 

He's very inconsistent and for such a guy that's right in his prime now he should be now influencing games, yet he still plays like a first year key forward.

Example is, he's had 8 years in the AFL system and yet he's never kicked 20 goals in a season at AFL level. The most he's kicked in a year is 19. Josh Schache for instance has even kicked 24 in one year.

When I think of incredibly talented players in the key forward stakes, the first two that come to mind are Aaron Naughton and Charlie Curnow. Weideman is not even remotely close to matching their talents.

He's actually a great guy off field and gives you that vibe that you badly want him to make it, but it's just not going to happen unfortunately. All good, better things in life then footy.

Edited by dazzledavey36

It doesn’t matter if he’s a star or bog ordinary, nobody, and I mean nobody, deserves to be personally abused. 

It was awful when Melbourne supporters did it, and nothing has changed now that Essendon supporters are doing it.

People need to take a good hard look at themselves. If that was your kid copping this garbage, you’d be disgusted and heartbroken. Sam has always done his best. Football is a damn hard industry and not everyone succeeds. But most people don’t have the talent or the guts to even try. Those that do deserve the basic level of respect from the fat losers in the stands. 

Is not good enough for AFL and doesn’t have the drive/hunger to push himself to make the grade. That’s ok, AFL is not for everyone.

1 hour ago, OutOfTheCentre21 said:

Sam Weideman has not kicked a goal in his past 7 AFL matches. 🤔

They should have re-signed Mitch Brown instead. 


For three bokes yesterday their lives changed. Did anyone notice?

One for Essendon. One for Carlton. One for MFC.

Nothing you can do about hateful social media comments. Best thing is to stay away from Insta, twitter and all the rest of them until your career is finished.

the Weid is a decent back up player. Can cover injuries in the ruck and forward. He is not best 22 for any club in the league. That’s clear at this stage.

I hope things work out for him. He’s a decent lad by all accounts.

55 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

"Incredibly talented footballer" is a bit of a stretch to be honest.

I accepted a while ago that I thought he was a good honest footballer who really does try his heart out, but still lacked the basics that you needed to take the next step of being a good key forward. 

He's very inconsistent and for such a guy that's right in his prime now he should be now influencing games, yet he still plays like a first year key forward.

Example is, he's had 8 years in the AFL system and yet he's never kicked 20 goals in a season at AFL level. The most he's kicked in a year is 19. Josh Schache for instance has even kicked 24 in one year.

When I think of incredibly talented players in the key forward stakes, the first two that come to mind are Aaron Naughton and Charlie Curnow. Weideman is not even remotely close to matching their talents.

He's actually a great guy off field and gives you that vibe that you badly want him to make it, but it's just not going to happen unfortunately. All good, better things in life then footy.

wasted pick 9 hope he gets going again he is not good to watch Feel sorrry for him

Alternative picks below

1 10 Carlton Harry McKay Carlton 103
1 11 Adelaide Wayne Milera Adelaide 90
1 12 Carlton Charlie Curnow Carlton 101
1 13 GWS Matthew Kennedy A Carlton 92
1 14 Brisbane Eric Hipwood A Brisbane 144
1 15 Richmond Daniel Rioli Richmond 153
1 16 GWS Harrison Himmelberg A GWS 143
1 17 Adelaide Tom Doedee Adelaide 82
1 18 St Kilda Jade Gresham St Kilda 129
1 19 Hawthorn Ryan Burton Port Adelaide 131
1 20 Gold Coast Brayden Fiorini Gold Coast 91
1 21 North Melbourne Ben McKay North Melbourne 64

 

Edited by Kent

 
1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

All good, better things in life than footy.

Besides family and friends, name one other.

27 minutes ago, Kent said:

wasted pick 9 hope he gets going again he is not good to watch Feel sorrry for him

Alternative picks below

1 10 Carlton Harry McKay Carlton 103
1 11 Adelaide Wayne Milera Adelaide 90
1 12 Carlton Charlie Curnow Carlton 101
1 13 GWS Matthew Kennedy A Carlton 92
1 14 Brisbane Eric Hipwood A Brisbane 144
1 15 Richmond Daniel Rioli Richmond 153
1 16 GWS Harrison Himmelberg A GWS 143
1 17 Adelaide Tom Doedee Adelaide 82
1 18 St Kilda Jade Gresham St Kilda 129
1 19 Hawthorn Ryan Burton Port Adelaide 131
1 20 Gold Coast Brayden Fiorini Gold Coast 91
1 21 North Melbourne Ben McKay North Melbourne 64

 

 No one gets everything right all the time and JT has a great strike rate.

When drafted he was seen as an exciting talent. It just hasn’t happened for him.

Agree with other posters, that he is a lovely guy to meet, but of course we don’t want lovely guys, we want great footballers.

PS: did we ever try him down back?

Edited by Redleg


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies