52 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Beautiful Reading ? 

Trelaor will be paid out, no other Club is going to touch that situation if they have an ounce of intelligence. 
This could stuff the Filth for years

The $100k offered each year by the Pies, is totally insignificant. If that is all they will pay, he is staying put.

29 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The $100k offered each year by the Pies, is totally insignificant. If that is all they will pay, he is staying put.

With luck Mr. Leg, would love to see them stuck with his salary for next 4 years.

Treloar would be nice...! But too expensive and 28. We can spend money elsewhere and be smart about it...! 

I would like to see us put the time into Harmes to get back to his best! Because his best is very good. He can play a lockdown role on opposing teams best mid and win his own ball... And can push forward and kick a goal or two! 
 

We shouldn’t underestimate the list we already have! The cattle is there... it’s whether the coach can get his sh#t together! 

This is just a really really bad breakup and it just went wrong. 

The pies fans are filthy and want answers. 

Not sure where Adam will ended up but it will be odd if it's at another melbourne club. I mean the pies think he will not cope with his wife away but as he has said it's something they did discuss. 

Id have him. 

56 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The $100k offered each year by the Pies, is totally insignificant. If that is all they will pay, he is staying put.

Absolutely. They are passing on a complete meltdown to a club 1-2 years later

 

13 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Absolutely. They are passing on a complete meltdown to a club 1-2 years later

 

Much prefer that meltdown in black and white

Wouldn't have happened under Gary Pert's watch?

15 hours ago, Redleg said:

The $100k offered each year by the Pies, is totally insignificant. If that is all they will pay, he is staying put.

Exactly, if someone wants to take on the other 800k a year they have rocks in their heads...

I wonder if covid and its affect on salary caps is an issue too, preventing the contract from being restructured?

For example: maybe if they offload him Collingwood is prepared to pay more next year, but not in year 5, but Treloar may not want to "front end" his contract to 2021 in case we dont have crowds and salaries are halved again.

Think of it like the Jack Martin effect. 

15 hours ago, Dee tention said:

Treloar would be nice...! But too expensive and 28. We can spend money elsewhere and be smart about it...! 

I would like to see us put the time into Harmes to get back to his best! Because his best is very good. He can play a lockdown role on opposing teams best mid and win his own ball... And can push forward and kick a goal or two! 
 

We shouldn’t underestimate the list we already have! The cattle is there... it’s whether the coach can get his sh#t together! 

Harmes going into the midfield against Brisbane was instrumental to our late comeback in that game.

48 minutes ago, rjay said:

Exactly, if someone wants to take on the other 800k a year they have rocks in their heads...

It is actually worse.

His last 3 years are reported at well over $1m each year.

That could be about $1.1m - $1.2m a year, for 3 last years of his contract at age 30-32. WOW! That is mind blowing.

For some reason 28 is considered ''old'' by many footy fans, especially Melb. supporters.

Shaun Burgoyne was 27 when he joined Hawthorn with a knee that was supposedly ''bone on bone''.  He's spent 11 years there.

But I sort of get it.  Melbourne players are usually cooked by the time they're 30.  What is it about the MFC ?

Unless Collingwood pay at least $250K they can keep Treloar.

the higher pick you give up, the more the filth should pay

give up a first rounder? pies should have a third of his salary going under their cap for the duration of the five years

the fact that they only want to pay $100k of the rumoured $900k for 2021 and NOTHING after that for the remaining four years is a joke

Apologise to the journo I said was a liver based on Nathan Buckley’s tweet denying why had been reported. What the hell is wrong with Collingwood, I hope it blows up in Nafan and Eddie’s face next season.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/playing-in-queensland-never-a-reality-for-adam-treloar-20201113-p56ebb.html

6 hours ago, Cards13 said:

Apologise to the journo I said was a liver based on Nathan Buckley’s tweet denying why had been reported. What the hell is wrong with Collingwood, I hope it blows up in Nafan and Eddie’s face next season.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/playing-in-queensland-never-a-reality-for-adam-treloar-20201113-p56ebb.html

at least you didn't call him a kidney! that would've been a blow too far :P

but seriously, the filth have come out of this smelling STINKY

On 10/16/2020 at 12:24 PM, adonski said:

Inside mid - tick
Butcher - tick
Would have to give up first rounder - tick

Sign me up

Two out of three ain't bad.

I'd love to know if we were ever interested in Treloar. Would have loved him, but anyway, it is what it is.

12 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

at least you didn't call him a kidney! that would've been a blow too far :P

but seriously, the filth have come out of this smelling STINKY

Hahaha bloody autocorrect/fat fingers “lier”

https://www.afl.com.au/news/525567/who-s-paying-what-dogs-pies-in-messy-stand-off-over-treloar-s-4-5m-deal

"The Magpies are playing hard-ball on the amount to which they will commit, and are taking the view that this is not their problem. 

It is believed the clubs are as far apart as $200,000 a year on at least one season of the five-season deal.”

So this is getting uglier by the minute. Thank god we didn't get involved in this deal. Also can't believe a deal can be signed off without the remuneration side of things sorted out.

Simple solution.

In law, where parties are not " ad Idem" or of" one mind", in other words where the terms of a contract are uncertain, it can where possible be set aside.

Therefore the Trade is declared void and Treloar returns to the Pies.

That threat, would bring a solution to the problem.

Player Agents and the Players Association must be furious with the Pies.

What a joke

Both clubs should be sanctioned by the AFL for failing to properly document the deal.

Player contracts aren't rocket science.

What a club??

16 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Simple solution.

In law, where parties are not " ad Idem" or of" one mind", in other words where the terms of a contract are uncertain, it can where possible be set aside.

Therefore the Trade is declared void and Treloar returns to the Pies.

That threat, would bring a solution to the problem.

Player Agents and the Players Association must be furious with the Pies.

That seems like the appropriate outcome, but will the AFL have the guts to enforce something like that?

Hilarious. 

Player managers will be looking on with interest. Good luck pies signing any FA's over the next few years.

55 minutes ago, Nascent said:

https://www.afl.com.au/news/525567/who-s-paying-what-dogs-pies-in-messy-stand-off-over-treloar-s-4-5m-deal

So this is getting uglier by the minute. Thank god we didn't get involved in this deal. Also can't believe a deal can be signed off without the remuneration side of things sorted out.

"The Magpies are playing hard-ball on the amount to which they will commit, and are taking the view that this is not their problem. 

It is believed the clubs are as far apart as $200,000 a year on at least one season of the five-season deal. "

Sweet Jesus, what a rabble. They have lawyers And contracts for a reason. They extended Treloar LAST year. One of the worst handling of a player I can recall