Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Turner said:

coz ive seen my team play finals once in my living memory whist my best mates support geelong and hawthorn

I feel for all of us - I am in the boat where I'm in my fifties and haven't seen a premiership.  Born just after the 1950's to 1964 dominance. Not sure I will see one either, and I have three kids who resent my choices for them :(

 
11 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Oh christ, Leon has dropped the skipper.   he is sending a message and calling for a big effort, they will set themselves for this one

A ruthlessness we lack!! Meanwhile Melksham still gets games! 

 
3 hours ago, jnrmac said:

You do understand that we can't afford players in the team that apply zero defensive pressure?

I don't think that's actually a policy, as there's plenty of players in that boat week in and week out !!   

(maybe it should be    weak: in / weak: out     which seems to occur at the selection table weekly)

55 minutes ago, KysaiahMessiah said:

I feel for all of us - I am in the boat where I'm in my fifties and haven't seen a premiership.  Born just after the 1950's to 1964 dominance. Not sure I will see one either, and I have three kids who resent my choices for them :(

What was the stat last night the WCE have made the finals 26 out of 34 seasons since they entered the competition and I think Geelong is next on the list 23 times over the same period.  We had a good run of finals from 87-2006, but 1 appearance since then is pretty hard to take.  Pretty similar from 65-86 don't think we made the finals through that period. 


2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

While that's his reputation, I didn't see it in the games he played for us.

I'm not saying he shouldn't remain on our list, but I also think he's still some distance away from his best footy. Will he get there? I don't know.

Fair point but he did show real class at times and a propensity to hit targets.  Your right on his journey though just being underway.

1 hour ago, KysaiahMessiah said:

I feel for all of us - I am in the boat where I'm in my fifties and haven't seen a premiership.  Born just after the 1950's to 1964 dominance. Not sure I will see one either, and I have three kids who resent my choices for them :(

Meh, I started following the Dees in 1965.. how do you think I feel??

I have an idea.

Why not pick a team as close as possible to the one that represented Melbourne the last time we played at the Gabba?

It was against Collingwood and we beat them by 56 points. This was the team:-

MELBOURNE

FB Michael Hibberd Steven May Jay Lockhart
HB Christian Salem Jake Lever Nathan Jones
C Ed Langdon Clayton Oliver Adam Tomlinson
HF Jake Melksham Tom McDonald Bayley Fritsch
FF Christian Petracca Sam Weideman Kysaiah Pickett
FOL Braydon Preuss Angus Brayshaw Jack Viney
I/C James Harmes Charlie Spargo Tom Sparrow Aaron vandenBerg
EMG Mitch Brown Mitch Hannan Jayden Hunt Joel Smith

Only three players - Jones, Brayshaw and Harmes are unavailable through injury and I would have Max Gawn in the side instead of Braydon Preuss.

The three to add would be Brown, Hannan and Rivers. 

That makes my changes for this week:-

IN Brown Hannan Lockhart T McDonald Spargo Sparrow

OUT Baker Bedford Hunt Neal-Bullen Preuss Smith

It looks better to me on paper than the team we sent out against the Dockers. Let’s see how it goes on grass.

 
14 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Meh, I started following the Dees in 1965.. how do you think I feel??

Got me by one year :). I was alive 9 days when St Kilda won their one and only....

Simon Goodwin said in his presser not to expect wholesale changes and the would be making a few tweaks only. I expect that means no more than 3. Based on his comments, I’d be very surprised if anyone was happy tonight when the teams come through. 


When i think of all the bigheads in this world that support seventeen other teams in the AFL, i actually feel pretty proud but sad that even though there hasn't been much success for the Club, they are still in there, and i know that my MFC supporting family members hardly ever waver, but when they do i always say "it's better to have lost than not to have won it all"

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

in 2018, it didnt look like we'd make the finals with 2 rounds remaining then we made a prelim.

so, anything can happen 

AND making the finals means Nth Melbourne lose in the 1st round draft pick swap.

It seems to me that it's the team's confidence that is the problem. Goody seems to yoyo between defensive submission or chaotic attack. Sometimes it works if the balance is right and reward for effort is obvious. But when the team gets stuck in defence mode, it just bleeds confidence.

4 hours ago, Dr.D said:

Why do people even want to make finals? Do people think you get a trophy for coming 8th and losing first round? 

we lost to Sydney and Fremantle. convincingly. I'd prefer to lose the next 2 games so change occurs. 

Leaving aside the possibility that Goodwin will coach next year barring 2 poor losses...

It would be nice to have a crack at Richmond in a final, as it was a lingering question from 2018, given our style syncs better with Richmond chaos ball;

How would we have gone if Hawthorn didn't take 4th? How would we have gone in a prelim v Richmond instead of Collingwood.. TMac/Cox ? 

or WCE at Metricon...

Yes, we probably lose by 5+ goals (or 10,), but who knows.

 

Edited by John Demonic

2 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

I have an idea.

Why not pick a team as close as possible to the one that represented Melbourne the last time we played at the Gabba?

It was against Collingwood and we beat them by 56 points. This was the team:-

MELBOURNE

FB Michael Hibberd Steven May Jay Lockhart
HB Christian Salem Jake Lever Nathan Jones
C Ed Langdon Clayton Oliver Adam Tomlinson
HF Jake Melksham Tom McDonald Bayley Fritsch
FF Christian Petracca Sam Weideman Kysaiah Pickett
FOL Braydon Preuss Angus Brayshaw Jack Viney
I/C James Harmes Charlie Spargo Tom Sparrow Aaron vandenBerg
EMG Mitch Brown Mitch Hannan Jayden Hunt Joel Smith

Only three players - Jones, Brayshaw and Harmes are unavailable through injury and I would have Max Gawn in the side instead of Braydon Preuss.

The three to add would be Brown, Hannan and Rivers. 

That makes my changes for this week:-

IN Brown Hannan Lockhart T McDonald Spargo Sparrow

OUT Baker Bedford Hunt Neal-Bullen Preuss Smith

It looks better to me on paper than the team we sent out against the Dockers. Let’s see how it goes on grass.

I like this. I’d like to see Jetta again this year also. 


Sounds like Sparrow will return, and i would assume Hannan, i hope so anyway, maybe Tom Mc 

Out: Pruess, Baker, one of Hunt ANB Pickett or Bedford

Spargo,  Brown and Jetta in

hibbered, Preuss and Bedford out

 

GWS basically swapped all 22 players out for a new 22.

 

 

8 changes for GWS

Edited by —coach—

4 hours ago, godees said:

I like this. I’d like to see Jetta again this year also. 

As much as Jetta has been a very good defender in his time, personally i think Jetta is now cooked godees and this appeared to be the case pretty much the entire season.

Hope i'm wrong but this particular in smacks of desperation stakes (ie., Lockhart isn't an option).  No way he is anywhere near  Hibb now.  What's up with Lockhart?  Must be injured as i'd be playing him 10 times outta 10 if the choice is between the two at this point.


7 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

I have an idea.

Why not pick a team as close as possible to the one that represented Melbourne the last time we played at the Gabba?

It was against Collingwood and we beat them by 56 points. This was the team:-

MELBOURNE

FB Michael Hibberd Steven May Jay Lockhart
HB Christian Salem Jake Lever Nathan Jones
C Ed Langdon Clayton Oliver Adam Tomlinson
HF Jake Melksham Tom McDonald Bayley Fritsch
FF Christian Petracca Sam Weideman Kysaiah Pickett
FOL Braydon Preuss Angus Brayshaw Jack Viney
I/C James Harmes Charlie Spargo Tom Sparrow Aaron vandenBerg
EMG Mitch Brown Mitch Hannan Jayden Hunt Joel Smith

Only three players - Jones, Brayshaw and Harmes are unavailable through injury and I would have Max Gawn in the side instead of Braydon Preuss.

The three to add would be Brown, Hannan and Rivers. 

That makes my changes for this week:-

IN Brown Hannan Lockhart T McDonald Spargo Sparrow

OUT Baker Bedford Hunt Neal-Bullen Preuss Smith

It looks better to me on paper than the team we sent out against the Dockers. Let’s see how it goes on grass.

We had a settled backline, had just worked out Weid straightened up the forward line structure, and since then we’ve pulled the team apart, totally Screwed it!Lockhart actually Stayed down, versus play Smith and every backmen goes for the punch! 
Lockhart plays against Swans & Freo and easy roved goals probably don’t happen, we get a lot closer!

Similarly with Viney / Brayshaw in middle and Petracca blend mid to forward, looks like getting it right then goes back to old structure!

FD can’t seem to recognise success and what works Vs what fails!

WJ you’ve done a better job than the FD, and the gents running the podcast also could easily identify what was wrong after Freo game!

If Goodwin doesn’t go they need to make 2-3 other coaching changes!!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies