Jump to content

CHANGES: Rd 14 vs St Kilda

titan_uranus
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

18 minutes ago, Older demon said:

Sparrow with a busted wing is out and we will be playing off a 5 day break so some may need to be rested  given we front up for the next game 4 days later. The Saints have a 4 day break so maybe that will help us. 

We have a 7 day break (game is next Saturday night); Saints 6 day break. 

 

    • Thanks 1
     

    We're not in a position to  drop Salem but, to be honest, I wish we were.

    I listened to the game rather than watch it. I then looked at a few highlights (or lowlights in Salem's case) For mine, there were at least a couple of instances where he had a chance to impact a contest and just didn't. The most galling was when a Bulldog player ran forward and had a shot for goal with Salem trailing behind seemingly in a jog. 

    It's easy to look at clips out of context but it certainly wasn't 'put it all out there' stuff. Maybe I'm being unfair.

    • Like 1
    18 hours ago, adonski said:

    Sparrow out with Jones back in will sort the outside run issues ?

    Sort some of these, at least, we could expect. We needed Jones' on-field drive today - setting a competitive example albeit slower than previously in his career. He is still one of the best evasive, pack-departing ball carriers.

    • Like 1
     
    6 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

    We're not in a position to  drop Salem but, to be honest, I wish we were.

    I listened to the game rather than watch it. I then looked at a few highlights (or lowlights in Salem's case) For mine, there were at least a couple of instances where he had a chance to impact a contest and just didn't. The most galling was when a Bulldog player ran forward and had a shot for goal with Salem trailing behind seemingly in a jog. 

    It's easy to look at clips out of context but it certainly wasn't 'put it all out there' stuff. Maybe I'm being unfair.

    Salem tends to slip under the radar quite a bit, this season. He does not really like a contest - be it physical or tackling opportunity. I'd reckon that his actual contribution has been minimal, as well. Sure, he can kick beautifully but his number of actual possessions is not quite what one might expect - this suggests that he needs to do more in order to win possessions. He also needs some readiness to play on rather than delay (a free, for example) and telegraph to the opposition his intended kick. I do not see Salem as a backman, although I concede that wiser heads so often do regard his backline work. Needs to be more active in the defensive gathering of the ball and its distribution. 

    • Like 2
    3 minutes ago, Deemania since 56 said:

    Salem tends to slip under the radar quite a bit, this season. He does not really like a contest - be it physical or tackling opportunity. I'd reckon that his actual contribution has been minimal, as well. Sure, he can kick beautifully but his number of actual possessions is not quite what one might expect - this suggests that he needs to do more in order to win possessions. He also needs some readiness to play on rather than delay (a free, for example) and telegraph to the opposition his intended kick. I do not see Salem as a backman, although I concede that wiser heads so often do regard his backline work. Needs to be more active in the defensive gathering of the ball and its distribution. 

    Spot on. He is rarely in a 'who do we drop' conversation. There's a fine line between looking laconic and just being passive. He's become a passive footballer. 

    • Like 1

    18 hours ago, adonski said:

    Sparrow out with Jones back in will sort the outside run issues ?

    Jones has lost whatever pace he had and is injured, I'd rather they try Jordon.

    • Like 1
    59 minutes ago, Older demon said:

    Sparrow with a busted wing is out and we will be playing off a 5 day break so some may need to be rested  given we front up for the next game 4 days later. The Saints have a 4 day break so maybe that will help us. My concern is that in the Dogs exploited us with the switch and fast transition and that the the Saints will murder us because that is their bread and butter game style.Lets hope the coaching staff are quick to come up with a solution to this.

    The backline is pretty settled except for Harmes who is out of sorts and probably out of position.. If not dropped he replaces Sparrow and Rivers comes in. Gawn in for Preuss and Mac is the backup ruckman and I doubt Jones will get up so soon with quad tightness. Look to the emergencies for who will come in. They were Mitch Brown, Mitch Hannan, Trent Rivers and Joel Smith. No real outside runners in this group

    Out Sparrow Preuss

    In Gawn, Rivers

    I admire your optimism but haven't seen much evidence over the past couple of years to feel that they will be able to (a) identify the problem and (b) rectify it.  :huh:

    • Like 1
    16 hours ago, chook fowler said:

    Ratten will wipe the floor with Goodwin 

    This is what worries me most. Ratten this week. Then finishing off against Cameron Longmuir Longmire .

    The bombers dont matter as it may be over by then.

    Real test of the coaching box coming up.

    • Thanks 1
     
    25 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

    Spot on. He is rarely in a 'who do we drop' conversation. There's a fine line between looking laconic and just being passive. He's become a passive footballer. 

    I wish they'd try Salem in the forward half. He is a good kick and that is what we lack there. Goodwin needs to stop playing him in the backline, we need more physical players there, until we do Salem is wasted and to a large degree ineffectual.

    • Like 1

    Minimal changes. 

    Gawn for Pruess.

    Jones for Sparrow.

    We didn't lose the game at the selection table. 

    • Like 1

    We have to win this one, so it makes it hard to make the deep cuts that would teach a few that if they want a spot, they have to do better.  

    Preuss - couldn’t tap to advantage against a midfielder.  WTF? 16 cm advantage and half of his hits went to doggies on the outside.  If Max is available, he comes in.

    Sparrow - busted wing.  You would think this is the opportunity to get Harmes into this role and put Rivers back.

    Hannan - a half forward with no pressure.  At least Jones would have done more. maybe this is what gives JJ his chance?  Or do they just roll in Jones if he pulls up OK?

    A few need a kick in the trousers.  Kozzie for his tackling style (pushing kickers forward giving downfield frees), Spargo (get involved), the midfield (sort it out!) TMAC (mark it, son!), Frittata (goal kicking).

    Put the acid on them to play the game on its system, not think they can cruise. Saints would have watched that and be drawing up plans already

    • Like 1
    On 3/24/2019 at 3:31 PM, rjay said:

    Tommy Mac worries me, he's had a good season as a forward but has been very average as of late.

    History shows he had a really good season and a bit as a defender then dropped off dramatically.

    Let's hope it's just an aberration and he's up and firing again soon but the trend is remarkably similar.

    Is Tommy getting ahead of himself or have the opposition worked him?

    A big call but maybe Tommy could do with some Casey time with his brother?

    From my topic back in early 2019...

    I think he should have been dropped back then.

    Most, including our FD lived in hope.

    It was false hope.

    Tmac must go out cant take a mark and slow bring in brown he must be given a chance.Jones in for the bird,bedford in pickett.Goodwin to give the rest a rocket

    tbh I don't think there are changes that will give us a win next week.

    Bulldogs scored a lot of goals (6? maybe...) from turnovers yesterday.  In a Ratten coached saints team in July 2019 they scored 12 goals from turnovers.  Our defence is better this year but so is their midfield and they are even better at spreading from the contest than last year.

    Our coaches know what the saints will bring.  Re-watching last year's game will refresh memories.  Hope they are ready this time and not tell us after the game that the saints came in with a plan that we weren't able to counter or that we will be ready next time.  Heard those old chestnut too many times already this year.

    If we can't stop the turnovers we are toast.  The answer is not player changes as we don't really have the right sort of player to bring in.  It will be better skills, better composure, more effort, better set-ups/structures around the ground and last but not least better coaching 

    Doubt that we can do all that. 

    Edited by Lucifer's Hero

    • Like 2

    A forward line with Bennell, Melksham and Fritsch would result in forward pressure somewhere between zero and token.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2

    I want to see Joel Smith replace T Mac in the forward line.    We lost Luke Jackson and replaced him with a slow, lumbering McDonald and it just looks terrible.

    We need to get back some of the athleticism and unpredictability that LJ gave us in forward 50 as the foil to Weid.    I am not saying Smith is as good as LJ obviously but hes the closest thing we have as far as leap and ability to get to contests.

    • Like 2

    T Mac was not great yesterday but the delivery inside 50 was horrible. He took two contested marks and kicked a goal. Enough to keep his spot. 

    We need to address the lack of run and spread and getting the ball out if congestion. Gawn coming back will make a big difference 

    • Like 3
    1 hour ago, cantstandyasam said:

    I wish they'd try Salem in the forward half. He is a good kick and that is what we lack there. Goodwin needs to stop playing him in the backline, we need more physical players there, until we do Salem is wasted and to a large degree ineffectual.

    That tally of '...being wasted in the backline...' on Goodwin's credit sheet affects the careers of two possible key players: Salem and Harmes. Meanwhile, Hunt is degenerating on the wooden plank, Smith has to sit to watch TMac stuff up continuously and several possible hot rockets with the pace of youth champ at the bit in readiness for an opportunity for which they are working very hard with immense patience. This list of poor management can easily be extended - to make matters worse - whereby effective players deteriorate out of position, out of favour and out of prudent development. 

     

    41 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

    I want to see Joel Smith replace T Mac in the forward line.    We lost Luke Jackson and replaced him with a slow, lumbering McDonald and it just looks terrible.

    We need to get back some of the athleticism and unpredictability that LJ gave us in forward 50 as the foil to Weid.    I am not saying Smith is as good as LJ obviously but hes the closest thing we have as far as leap and ability to get to contests.

    Smith is hungry ... talented ... under-developed ... ready. Goodwin, give him a go! TMac ain't the answer any more. Just because the McDonald brothers are taller than you, SG, as Coach, you should not be scared to give them the advice to move on.

     

    • Like 1

    The season is on the line - it's not the time for experiments, so no Jordan or Bedford please.

    We also can't continue to go with our two tiny small forwards - Pickett and Spargo - rotate them by all means over the next few weeks but as we saw against Dogs, it doesn't work having both of them crumbing and as eager as they are, they don't provide power or aerial presence. We got away with it against Pies because they were spent on four-day break. One crumbing small is enough. Pickett in Alice, Spargo against Swans.

    A decision is required on T.Mac and whether his lack of pace (and confidence now) will be exposed again. Brown is the option and he leads up well so I'm happy if we go down that track. Happy for us to consider retaining Preuss instead of Brown, given Gawny is coming back and given the Saints are playing two rucks. 

    Alice Springs is the right game to play Bennell. It is amazing how the indigenous players lift there.

    Size of Saints (Ryder, Marshall, Battle, King, Membrey, Howard, Wilkie) means that we have to have a back-up for our bigs just in case one gets injured - hence Joel Smith's flexibility wins him the spot ahead of Rivers.

    Final choice is between Hannan and Hunt. I'd prefer Hunt's added pace.

    Out: Sparrow (inj), T.Mac, Spargo, Hannan, Preuss

    In: Bennell, Brown, J.Smith, Hunt, Gawn


    20 hours ago, Nelo said:

    Why don’t they revert back to playing Harmes as a tagger? Seemed to work. 

    Because that would mean that Goodwin would need to make a change on game day and that’s not his style. 
     

    I have lost count the number of posters who have said this me included. 

    • Like 2
    • Author
    35 minutes ago, Deespicable said:

    The season is on the line - it's not the time for experiments, so no Jordan or Bedford please.

    We also can't continue to go with our two tiny small forwards - Pickett and Spargo - rotate them by all means over the next few weeks but as we saw against Dogs, it doesn't work having both of them crumbing and as eager as they are, they don't provide power or aerial presence. We got away with it against Pies because they were spent on four-day break. One crumbing small is enough. Pickett in Alice, Spargo against Swans.

    A decision is required on T.Mac and whether his lack of pace (and confidence now) will be exposed again. Brown is the option and he leads up well so I'm happy if we go down that track. Happy for us to consider retaining Preuss instead of Brown, given Gawny is coming back and given the Saints are playing two rucks. 

    Alice Springs is the right game to play Bennell. It is amazing how the indigenous players lift there.

    Size of Saints (Ryder, Marshall, Battle, King, Membrey, Howard, Wilkie) means that we have to have a back-up for our bigs just in case one gets injured - hence Joel Smith's flexibility wins him the spot ahead of Rivers.

    Final choice is between Hannan and Hunt. I'd prefer Hunt's added pace.

    Out: Sparrow (inj), T.Mac, Spargo, Hannan, Preuss

    In: Bennell, Brown, J.Smith, Hunt, Gawn

    Not the time for experiments...but you want to play Smith?

    • Like 3
    1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

    tbh I don't think there are changes that will give us a win next week.

    Bulldogs scored a lot of goals (6? maybe...) from turnovers yesterday.  In a Ratten coached saints team in July 2019 they scored 12 goals from turnovers.  Our defence is better this year but so is their midfield and they are even better at spreading from the contest than last year.

    Our coaches know what the saints will bring.  Re-watching last year's game will refresh memories.  Hope they are ready this time and not tell us after the game that the saints came in with a plan that we weren't able to counter or that we will be ready next time.  Heard those old chestnut too many times already this year.

    If we can't stop the turnovers we are toast.  The answer is not player changes as we don't really have the right sort of player to bring in.  It will be better skills, better composure, more effort, better set-ups/structures around the ground and last but not least better coaching 

    Doubt that we can do all that. 

    I'm not sure we can match St Kida if they bring their best unless ... we win the tap outs,  win possession from the taps to advantage,  win the clearances in 50/50 situations and then use the ball well when we have possession.

    Across half back and the back half of the midfield we also need to win the ball back as often as possible ... and again,  use the ball well when we get hold of it. 

    And the forward line needs to fire ... 2 marking targets would help enormously but Weideman can't be totally relied on as a prominent key whilst T-Mac is out of form.

    We'll need a number of things to go our way to win the game.

    • Like 1
     

    Out: Preuss, T Mac, Spargo, Harmes, Sparrow

    In: Gawn, Brown, Hunt, Bedford, Jones 

    Would love to bring in a player of Benell’s quality but when defending the ground is the question he isn’t the answer.

    Hunt is a must inclusion for me which may seem strange but we need his speed and hunger in the forward half.

    Melksham read the riot act. Another week of that rubbish and he can go.

    • Author
    15 minutes ago, Macca said:

    I'm not sure we can match St Kida if they bring their best unless ... we win the tap outs,  win possession from the taps to advantage,  win the clearances in 50/50 situations and then use the ball well when we have possession.

    Across half back and the back half of the midfield we also need to win the ball back as often as possible ... and again,  use the ball well when we get hold of it. 

    And the forward line needs to fire ... 2 marking targets would help enormously but Weideman can't be totally relied on as a prominent key whilst T-Mac is out of form.

    We'll need a number of things to go our way to win the game.

    The three keys IMO are getting on top in the middle, being efficient in our forward 50, and pressuring them in our back half before they get out.

    If they get on top in the middle, we won't score enough to win.

    If we waste our chances forward of centre and turn it over, they'll destroy us on transition.

    And if we don't pressure them from their kick ins, they'll waltz out of the backline like the Dogs.

    We're capable of winning this, but in all likelihood we won't be able to do all of this at once.

    5 minutes ago, P-man said:

    Out: Preuss, T Mac, Spargo, Harmes, Sparrow

    In: Gawn, Brown, Hunt, Bedford, Jones 

    Would love to bring in a player of Benell’s quality but when defending the ground is the question he isn’t the answer.

    Hunt is a must inclusion for me which may seem strange but we need his speed and hunger in the forward half.

    Melksham read the riot act. Another week of that rubbish and he can go.

    Hunt, Bedford and Jones all in, but Harmes out. Who's taking Harmes' rotation in the back half?

    If you're going to drop Harmes and Spargo, I'd suggest only two of these three forwards come in, and Rivers gets the other spot.

    • Like 2

    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

      The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 15

      As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • 287 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Like
      • 372 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 33 replies
      Demonland
    View All