Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
18 minutes ago, roy11 said:

Well that is good news. I thought they would have departed after the 2019 season debacle. 
well done Mr Pert. 
another Tick ✔️ 

 
24 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Well that is good news. I thought they would have departed after the 2019 season debacle. 
well done Mr Pert. 
another Tick ✔️ 

perhaps not everyone, or every entity is reactionary as you?


11 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

perhaps not everyone, or every entity is reactionary as you?

Perhaps, but the Car Industry is very tight, with Jaguar not doing so well. 
 

  • Author

Wonder how similar the terms are for the extension. But good to know that jaguar (even if facing some issues themselves) see the benefit in sponsoring us in 2020. 

Thank you Jaguar and all of our sponsors great and small.

 

A significant signing given that they would have expected a much better 2019 from us.  Fortunately, we have ANZAC Eve and QB blockbuster games this year which may have helped them re-sign for 2020.

Great that Jaguar are keeping the faith.

Same old line is trotted our every time with all our sponsors... I’m tired of it.

“To be aligned with a club with such a rich history and to continue to grow the Jaguar brand on a national scale is fantastic,”

 


4 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Same old line is trotted our every time with all our sponsors... I’m tired of it.

“To be aligned with a club with such a rich history and to continue to grow the Jaguar brand on a national scale is fantastic,”

 

What else is there to say however @McQueen? Not many trophies in the cabinet recently, aside from the bad boy below....

DWMO5SJU0AA9CLb.jpg

Edited by Engorged Onion

So we still get 50% off new and used Jags? 

24 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

What else is there to say however @McQueen? Not many trophies in the cabinet recently, aside from the bad boy below....

DWMO5SJU0AA9CLb.jpg

That’s my point mate. 
 

Missing any reference to ‘successful’. 

1 minute ago, McQueen said:

That’s my point mate. 
 

Missing any reference to ‘successful’. 

yeah I knew that, just wanted to riff on it a bit more ;)


Good to have them on board again. In this case, I think the fact they are a year to year proposition reflects their own financial position and is a little less about mfc. Also, with the fixture now out and an extra MCG game, its easier for the club and sponsor to quantify the exposure the mfc can offer their brand and how much that should cost.

All supporters (even if you aren't looking at buying now) should click on the links as these stats are used to assess marketing performance!

1 hour ago, binman said:

Important vote of confidence.

You can say that again, wish I could afford one but a bit out of my league. Just bought a Holden instead, no gain for the club but sadly that was my budget.

19 minutes ago, old dee said:

Just bought a Holden instead

Surprised you didn't go for the Oldsmobile.  ?


2 hours ago, Engorged Onion said:

What else is there to say however @McQueen? Not many trophies in the cabinet recently, aside from the bad boy below....

DWMO5SJU0AA9CLb.jpg

I had to take a week off work after celebrating that monumental achievement.

42 minutes ago, old dee said:

You can say that again, wish I could afford one but a bit out of my league. Just bought a Holden instead, no gain for the club but sadly that was my budget.

You must be one of the few who has, Cheap Deal?

Great news considering how bad we went. 
 

Another yr Extension so maybe they are going to see if we are any good next season before deciding to extend again. 
 

Let’s hope next season we are much better then they can sign a multi yr extension. 

 

it surprises me why some car companies bother with sponsorship of AFL teams. Take Jeep as an example in spite of being with Richmond for the last five years and winning 2 flags their sales continue to dive. You could say what would their sales be without Richmond? The same IMO. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies