Guest Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Woo-hoo. Gold Coast are not given No.2 pick. Quote
ding 5,126 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Yeah, they were given pick one instead... Which means they now have 1 AND 2. 1 Quote
Guest Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 I went too soon. Gerard Whately called it incorrectly. Boo-hoo. Quote
Moonshadow 17,678 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 And our second rounder also gets pushed by them having beginning of 2nd round pp. Double shafting 1 Quote
Cheap Seats 3,310 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Haha thread of the year 1 Quote
GCDee 3,202 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Moonshadow said: And our second rounder also gets pushed by them having beginning of 2nd round pp. Double shafting meh... the second round pick was going for Langdon. I think giving them a mid first round pick next year is a bit of a joke given pre season hasn't even started yet. After Martin goes they will be adding picks 1 & 2 plus another first rounder plus have the first two picks of the second round. The will also be adding Ellis as a FA and have the likes of Rankine to come in and improve their list. This team will rise up the ladder very quickly if they get their culture right this time around and it will be really awkward if the Suns finish 8-12 next year and are still granted another first round PP... Quote
ArtificialWisdom 4,045 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, Moonshadow said: And our second rounder also gets pushed by them having beginning of 2nd round pp. Double shafting It's the old schoolyard take backs. Given they traded that pick to Brisbane last year 1 Quote
Moonshadow 17,678 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, GCDee said: meh... the second round pick was going for Langdon. I think giving them a mid first round pick next year is a bit of a joke given pre season hasn't even started yet. After Martin goes they will be adding picks 1 & 2 plus another first rounder plus have the first two picks of the second round. The will also be adding Ellis as a FA and have the likes of Rankine to come in and improve their list. This team will rise up the ladder very quickly if they get their culture right this time around and it will be really awkward if the Suns finish 8-12 next year and are still granted another first round PP... Only one. Other was traded. Edit. AF beat me to it above Edited September 30, 2019 by Moonshadow 1 Quote
deebug 1,754 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Just give them the lot #$*& you AFL We have been struggleing for decades and get zip, they have only had to suffer a few years. Why not give them s flag, a 5 goal head start in every match next year, any player the next 20 years You watch they will win a flag before us. ? Quote
Lord Travis 10,819 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Close this thread before someone commits suicide. 1 2 Quote
mauriesy 7,444 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 So we get #3 instead of #2, when going into this year we thought we might get #16-18. Some people whinge over the smallest differences. 4 Quote
Demon Disciple 12,537 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 1 hour ago, mauriesy said: So we get #3 instead of #2, when going into this year we thought we might get #16-18. Some people whinge over the smallest differences. Yep, and fail to comprehend the big problem in the real scheme of things..............how the [censored] did we end up 2nd last on the ladder? Quote
RalphiusMaximus 6,112 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 9 hours ago, Demon Disciple said: Yep, and fail to comprehend the big problem in the real scheme of things..............how the [censored] did we end up 2nd last on the ladder? That's easy to understand. Our coaches have no [censored] idea how to play. Quote
WERRIDEE 5,638 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK This is bull [censored]. We stay on the bottom for years and get nothing they spend one year on the bottom and get a priority. The AFL choose favourites so why didn't they stop Lynch going to the Tigers and destroying them. WHAT A JOKE! The question has to be asked who is no3 in the draft? Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Depends on the team, Rowell is a safer option, but Anderson i think is more talanted. sadly Suns get both. Quote
FireInTheBennelly 4,104 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 4 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said: Depends on the team, Rowell is a safer option, but Anderson i think is more talanted. sadly Suns get both. For a little while Quote
Dee Zephyr 19,312 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 Listening to SEN a short time ago on the drive home, I think it was Chris Pelchen on with the host and they were talking about Pick 2 and how the Hawks will make a play for it in order to nab Anderson. I only caught the chat half way through so I’m unsure if it’s just Pelchen’s suggestion or if there’s any substance to it. Wouldn’t surprise at all if this did eventuate. Quote
Pennant St Dee 13,453 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 7 hours ago, Dee Zephyr said: Listening to SEN a short time ago on the drive home, I think it was Chris Pelchen on with the host and they were talking about Pick 2 and how the Hawks will make a play for it in order to nab Anderson. I only caught the chat half way through so I’m unsure if it’s just Pelchen’s suggestion or if there’s any substance to it. Wouldn’t surprise at all if this did eventuate. I believe it was only given to them on the provision that they keep both picks and keep the two best friends together. That's what I'm hearing anyway 3 Quote
rjay 25,424 Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 8 hours ago, Dee Zephyr said: Listening to SEN a short time ago on the drive home, I think it was Chris Pelchen on with the host and they were talking about Pick 2 and how the Hawks will make a play for it in order to nab Anderson. I only caught the chat half way through so I’m unsure if it’s just Pelchen’s suggestion or if there’s any substance to it. Wouldn’t surprise at all if this did eventuate. Pelchen is full of it... 1 Quote
Slartibartfast 18,122 Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 Sorry if this has been mentioned elsewhere but someone mentioned there had been discussion in the media that Anderson was not a lock at 2 and might fall to us as GCS will nominate Green at 2 and GWS won't match. Has anyone else heard this? Quote
ben russell 764 Posted November 16, 2019 Posted November 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Baghdad Bob said: Sorry if this has been mentioned elsewhere but someone mentioned there had been discussion in the media that Anderson was not a lock at 2 and might fall to us as GCS will nominate Green at 2 and GWS won't match. Has anyone else heard this? Magical if true. 1 Quote
Whispering_Jack 31,368 Posted November 17, 2019 Posted November 17, 2019 Going by the way the AFL sold the news of its draft concessions to the public (GCS taking two best mates from Victoria to limit the go home factor) I think it would be highly unlikely that the Suns would depart from the script of selecting Rowell and Anderson with 1/2. 1 Quote
RalphiusMaximus 6,112 Posted November 18, 2019 Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/17/2019 at 1:16 PM, Whispering_Jack said: Going by the way the AFL sold the news of its draft concessions to the public (GCS taking two best mates from Victoria to limit the go home factor) I think it would be highly unlikely that the Suns would depart from the script of selecting Rowell and Anderson with 1/2. But how great would it be if they did? Quote
JakovichScissorKick 771 Posted November 18, 2019 Posted November 18, 2019 Imagine finishing 17th with 6 wins and not having access to Green, Rowell or Anderson. Quote
Males 578 Posted November 18, 2019 Posted November 18, 2019 On 11/16/2019 at 4:32 PM, Baghdad Bob said: Sorry if this has been mentioned elsewhere but someone mentioned there had been discussion in the media that Anderson was not a lock at 2 and might fall to us as GCS will nominate Green at 2 and GWS won't match. Has anyone else heard this? Every media report I’ve heard/read has stated that GC have already picked Rowell and Anderson. The AFL would not let GC not pick the two, picking two best mates was the excuse the AFL and GC “sold” to the public/media. Can you imagine how bad the AFL would look if GC changed their mind, the AFL will take away the rest of the concessions given to them in that instance. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.