Jump to content

Splitting Draft Pick 3

Demon3
Demon3
in Melbourne Demons

POLL 259 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the Demons split their Pick 3 by trading it for 2 First Round Picks

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

32 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

How's Nancy?

Nancy’s pretty rotten at the moment and quiet frankly, I’m not much better.

 Thanks for asking though.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 7
     

    I wonder if it’s possible to trade our picks 97 and 115 for GWS pick 60 and our agreement not to pick Tom Green at 3?

    This would enable GWS to do a trade with Adelaide involving a trade of picks 4 and 6 and give us a better third pick down the line for what amounts to no cost.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I still think this is a big change of happening.

    GWS have, in terms of 2020 picks:

    - GWS 1st round pick

    - GWS 2nd round pick 

    - GWS 3rd round pick

    - North 3rd round pick

    I think to satisfy us, it’d have to be pick 6, 1st and 2nd round picks at a minimum. Maybe even a third too. In a very weak & compromised draft, GWS should be content to trade out, just as we’d expect more in return than you normally would.

    The other possibility is that we’re simply keeping pick 3, but want to prime GWS for us to bid on Green, to solidify our reputation as straight-shooters and ensure we have more options at 8.

    I’d be bloody happy with Green, but they’ll never allow it to happen.

    I think GWS have tried to be too cute, not working hard enough to complete a trade using players, or acquiring good enough assets before the end of the trade period, with the assumption that we’ll eventually trade as it gets the best net result for us.

    The fly in the ointment is that I’m not sure we’re willing to give a competitor such an advantage without significantly benefitting ourselves (and bringing their position back into line).

    Interesting times.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
     

    FWIW, someone on a different Melbourne forum is claiming that our initial request from GWS in exchange for pick 3 was:

    Pick 6 + 2x further first rounders 

    Also says the players we’re mainly interested in are:

    Young, Serong, Weightman, Gould, Kemp, Ash in that order 

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Mach5 said:

    I still think this is a big change of happening.

    GWS have, in terms of 2020 picks:

    - GWS 1st round pick

    - GWS 2nd round pick 

    - GWS 3rd round pick

    - North 3rd round pick

    I think to satisfy us, it’d have to be pick 6, 1st and 2nd round picks at a minimum. Maybe even a third too. In a very weak & compromised draft, GWS should be content to trade out, just as we’d expect more in return than you normally would.

    The other possibility is that we’re simply keeping pick 3, but want to prime GWS for us to bid on Green, to solidify our reputation as straight-shooters and ensure we have more options at 8.

    I’d be bloody happy with Green, but they’ll never allow it to happen.

    I think GWS have tried to be too cute, not working hard enough to complete a trade using players, or acquiring good enough assets before the end of the trade period, with the assumption that we’ll eventually trade as it gets the best net result for us.

    The fly in the ointment is that I’m not sure we’re willing to give a competitor such an advantage without significantly benefitting ourselves (and bringing their position back into line).

    Interesting times.

    I could be wrong, but isn’t there a rule that, if you trade out your future 1st, you can’t trade out picks from any other rounds (unless you have more than one pick in a round)? If this is right, it would mean the best we could hope for is their 1st & a 3rd?

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    If we do split Pick 3. It has to be with Freo for 7 & 10. 3 Young is a lot to give up!

    7 ?????, 8 Stephens & 10 Weightman

    If we pass up on Young. Salem needs to take his kicking and daring to another level. He is to Vanilla for me and should be a game breaker from half back. Should be looking at moulding his game on Bachar Houli from the Tigers!

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
    2 hours ago, Dee tention said:

    He is to Vanilla for me and should be a game breaker from half back. Should be looking at moulding his game on Bachar Houli from the Tigers!

    Agree he is too safe with his kicking.

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, adonski said:

    FWIW, someone on a different Melbourne forum is claiming that our initial request from GWS in exchange for pick 3 was:

    Pick 6 + 2x further first rounders 

    Also says the players we’re mainly interested in are:

    Young, Serong, Weightman, Gould, Kemp, Ash in that order 

    I hope he’s a nuffy who has no idea what he’s talking about then. ?

  • Quote
    •  
    10 hours ago, Males said:

    I hope he’s a nuffy who has no idea what he’s talking about then. ?

    I think @adonski is referring to Devastating Boris on Big Footy. He seems to have solid sources/info (well he doesn't get shot down) but would appreciate feedback on his form from Big Footy lurkers. According to D Boris:

    Just some bits and pieces I heard yesterday.

    Sounds like we’re confident of potentially turning 3&8 into two top 10s and a 15-20, or just 3 into another top 10 and two future firsts. Haven’t got specifics, that’s just the talk.

    GWS desperate to get 3. Sounds like they want Jackson and Green. There is no scenario that Green is not matched. Suns could call him first and GWS would match, ignore the inevitable bluffing.

    We’re right into Young, Serong, Weightman & Gould. Ash and Kemp are looked at as contingencies apparently. 8 is most likely going on Weightman if we have it.

    Crows likely taking Flanders. Swans likely Serong or Young. Both crows and swans will nominate green (depending on GWS trades)

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • 2 weeks later...

    Do we think JT is trying to get into Freos head. 

    Freo want Jackson and Robertson at 7 and 10 and use pick 22 plus change to match on a bid for Henry. 
     

    Seems Dees could trade 8 for 10 and 22. 
     

    Hmmm. Amazingly Freo might be tempted. 
     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    People need to actually get their head around the fact that maybe JT is actually genuinely interested in Jackson. This whole thing that he's playing games with Freo is just laughable.

    Go back to the podcast with Jason Taylor and it actually makes sense why we are targeting Jackson. They see him starting his career as a key forward which is exactly a big need for us as there are still question marks over Weideman.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    38 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

    People need to actually get their head around the fact that maybe JT is actually genuinely interested in Jackson. This whole thing that he's playing games with Freo is just laughable.

    Go back to the podcast with Jason Taylor and it actually makes sense why we are targeting Jackson. They see him starting his career as a key forward which is exactly a big need for us as there are still question marks over Weideman.

     

    I agree, and think he could legit go at 3, even though I would rather others (same at 8 too)

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    On 10/26/2019 at 2:26 PM, Elwood 3184 said:

    I wonder if it’s possible to trade our picks 97 and 115 for GWS pick 60 and our agreement not to pick Tom Green at 3?

    This would enable GWS to do a trade with Adelaide involving a trade of picks 4 and 6 and give us a better third pick down the line for what amounts to no cost.

    Yep let's do some draft tampering after our history of tanking... FMD

  • Quote
    9 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

    Do we think JT is trying to get into Freos head. 

    Freo want Jackson and Robertson at 7 and 10 and use pick 22 plus change to match on a bid for Henry. 
     

    Seems Dees could trade 8 for 10 and 22. 
     

    Hmmm. Amazingly Freo might be tempted. 
     

     

    Why would we give up so much for 8 to then downgrade it? 3 I can see us maybe doing something with 3 if the offer is good enough, but we payed overs for 8 for a reason.

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    Young is a lock at 3 with a fair margin between him and the rest.  They wont be splitting it and only a fool would give up Young.

    The FD (with a huge shove from Macca) backed their other 2nd KF horse (Weid) years ago and made it known they were all in it together on his re-signing till 2021 and, barring a repeat of 2019 (from Weid), need to live with that call and build the team around him and T-mac as the two KFs until his contract is up.

    Edited by Rusty Nails

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    12 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

    Young is a lock at 3 with a fair margin between him and the rest.  They wont be splitting it and only a fool would give up Young.

    The FD (with a huge shove from Macca) backed their other 2nd KF horse (Weid) years ago and made it known they were all in it together on his re-signing till 2021 and, barring a repeat of 2019 (from Weid), need to live with that call and build the team around him and T-mac as the two KFs until his contract is up.

    I think most of us agree we go young at 3. But Im not sure we have to stick with a formula til 2021because a key forward seems to have been sadly  over estimated. Weid will get his chance this year and I hope Im surprised, but aside from ONE game I havent seen him look like a key forward. Not in the air and not on the ground.  I just cant see him being a key in a premiership. 

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, Rusty Nails said:

    Young is a lock at 3 with a fair margin between him and the rest.  They wont be splitting it and only a fool would give up Young.

    So you're absolutely guaranteeing Young will be the best player in this draft after Rowell and Anderson?  Big early call.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    50 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

    So you're absolutely guaranteeing Young will be the best player in this draft after Rowell and Anderson?  Big early call.

    He could well end up better...who knows.

    I think we will keep 3 now and take Young, it makes sense to me anyway.

    I'm not sure what could be on offer that would make us split it...

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    1 hour ago, rjay said:

    He could well end up better...who knows.

    I think we will keep 3 now and take Young, it makes sense to me anyway.

    I'm not sure what could be on offer that would make us split it...

    7 & 10.

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, Dees247 said:

    7 & 10.

    Depends on how you rate the player at 3...

    One great player v 2 average players.

    It could be so even that we end up with 2 good players v one good player.

    Hope we make the right call.

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    Honestly I'd split both picks and get 4 high quality top 20 kids in. Maybe you end up with 1 star, 2 solid players and 1 bust.

    But....

    If you can get 1 elite player then you have to do that. 

    Young's kicking is special
    Jackson's movement at his size is special
    Kemp's movement and skills for his size are special (bearing in mind the ACL)
    Tom Green's clearance work is off the charts.

    The argument against trading pick 3 is to get a great player with rare abilities. 

    Pick 8 I'm more for trading as I'm not sure there will be a special player left on the board for us to pick, but again it's a matter of how deep the list of high quality players on our board goes.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    On today’s Road to the Draft Podcast, they said that the Dees were keen to split pick 8, and suggested we might do it with the Cats, for 14 & 17. Also suggested Weightman might still be there at those picks. Went on to say that we weren’t going to risk loosing the player we want at 8 though. So I’d assume if we (somehow) knew we would get Weightman at 14, we would trade 8, take Weightman at 14, and take 17 to the draft.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Angry 1
     
    4 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

    So you're absolutely guaranteeing Young will be the best player in this draft after Rowell and Anderson?  Big early call.

    Going by the history of the draft, it's highly likely Rowell and/or Anderson will not be the best player/s in the draft.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    6 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Going by the history of the draft, it's highly likely Rowell and/or Anderson will not be the best player/s in the draft.

    Exactly. 

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 11

      Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

        • Thanks
      • 84 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Sydney

      The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 3 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Brisbane

      “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Southport

      The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Sydney

      Just a game and percentage outside the Top 8, the Demons return to Melbourne to face the Sydney Swans at the MCG, with a golden opportunity to build on the momentum from toppling the reigning premiers on their own turf. Who comes in, and who makes way?

        • Thanks
      • 296 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Brisbane

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a famous victory by the Demons over the Lions at the Gabba.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 35 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All