Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Whether Braydon Pruess and Max can work in tandem? He suggested that Pruessy would always be behind Max and threw it out there that if so

queried whether the club should / could entertain a trade if IF a Ruck Poor club came knocking and the deal was too good to refuse! He also was aware that he had a two year deal.

Personally, I cannot see it happening but stranger things have happened! I for one have always believed that bot Max and Pruessy can play in same team.

Interesting comments.

 

I heard this too, and while I don’t think we’ll trade him, it was nice to think, that for once, we brought in a player cheaply that could have a high trade value

 

I’d like to have a few weeks with them both playing. Can’t be any worse than what we’ve seen from the team this year. 

Trade him in a deal to North for Ben Brown lol. 

I like like Preuss, perfect situation to try them both in the same team now given TMAC is out.

let Preuss EAT


Cannot possibly play in the same team.  Preuss is slow as a key forward.  Max isn't super mobile as a KPP either.

 

Only way it can happen is a Brodie Grundy and Darcy Moore (type).

 

Unless we inflate his value, don't know why we did this.  Must be traded this year.

 
19 minutes ago, picket fence said:

queried whether the club should / could entertain a trade if IF a Ruck Poor club came knocking

If we traded Pruess we would then be the ruck poor club...

As we may have noticed yesterday, a back up for Max is pretty important I would have thought.

its a quandary for sure...Preuss looks like he could be a decent no 1 ruckman but obviously he isn't going to play that role for us unless Max is injured. But if we trade him we have no one else in the event that Max is injured...can they both play in the same side? Seeing as finals are long gone now is surely the time to find out.


I think Preuss and Max will play really well together and suprise a lot of people. 

Jimmy and Strawbs worked very well...

Both need to practice Goal Kicking. 

2-3 a game can be the difference between a W and a L

And  this is why i dont listen to SEN

Trade a player out a year after we traded him in? No chance. 

I don’t know if they can play together as we haven’t seen enough of it to know. The end of this horrible season is a good time to test it out. But unless Preuss can prove a good forward fixture, then my answer is sadly no. Robs us of too much run, and heaven forbid we are down on rotations like yesterday we are stuffed. 

1. There are no ruck poor clubs. Every club has a starting ruck as good as Preuss with the exceptions probably being Dogs and Freo who have young rucks who are good enough to play and have a far higher ceiling. Preuss might push for game time at some clubs but not to the extent that they are trading a top 40 pick for him.

Adel - O'Brien (or Jacobs)
Bris - Martin
Carl - Kreuzer
Coll - Grundy*
Ess - Bellchambers
Freo - Lobb/Darcy 
GWS - Mumford
Geel - Stanley
GC - Witts
Haw - big boy
North - Goldy
Port - Lycett
Richmond - Nankervis
Sydney  - Sinclair*
St Kilda - Marshall
WBulldogs - English
WC - Nic Nat

* the only homes I can think about: If Grundy were to leave the Pies which I think is very unlikely or if the Swans had desires on Sinclair as a forward which I also think would be silly.

2. We got Preuss for a reason. To fill a very important role as back up to Max so we have someone to bring in so Max doesn't have to play 22 games a year at 85% game time. Preuss is also a back up for the tall forwards which we're hopefully about to see.

3. Whether he can or can't play alongside Max doesn't really matter, the back up ruck is just as important if you're planning to be in finals contention.

 

16 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I think Preuss and Max will play really well together and suprise a lot of people. 

Jimmy and Strawbs worked very well...

 Both need to practice Goal Kicking. 

2-3 a game can be the difference between a W and a L

Jimmy and Strawbs that was 1988.


15 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

1. There are no ruck poor clubs. Every club has a starting ruck as good as Preuss with the exceptions probably being Dogs and Freo who have young rucks who are good enough to play and have a far higher ceiling. Preuss might push for game time at some clubs but not to the extent that they are trading a top 40 pick for him.

Adel - O'Brien (or Jacobs)
Bris - Martin
Carl - Kreuzer
Coll - Grundy*
Ess - Bellchambers
Freo - Lobb/Darcy 
GWS - Mumford
Geel - Stanley
GC - Witts
Haw - big boy
North - Goldy
Port - Lycett
Richmond - Nankervis
Sydney  - Sinclair*
St Kilda - Marshall
WBulldogs - English
WC - Nic Nat

* the only homes I can think about: If Grundy were to leave the Pies which I think is very unlikely or if the Swans had desires on Sinclair as a forward which I also think would be silly.

2. We got Preuss for a reason. To fill a very important role as back up to Max so we have someone to bring in so Max doesn't have to play 22 games a year at 85% game time. Preuss is also a back up for the tall forwards which we're hopefully about to see.

3. Whether he can or can't play alongside Max doesn't really matter, the back up ruck is just as important if you're planning to be in finals contention.

 

4. To replace Gawn when he retires.

40 minutes ago, TGR said:

Cannot possibly play in the same team.  Preuss is slow as a key forward.  Max isn't super mobile as a KPP either.

 

Only way it can happen is a Brodie Grundy and Darcy Moore (type).

 

Unless we inflate his value, don't know why we did this.  Must be traded this year.

OMG.

We have no one else and he was probably our second best player on sunday and you say he must go.

Wow.

Very  good Game from the big spruce Pruess yesterday.  He made  Kruezer look like a  rookie   on quite  a few  occasions and  won their contest  easily.  He's  not going  anywhere. 

 

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

OMG.

We have no one else and he was probably our second best player on sunday and you say he must go.

Wow.

If we didn't have Gawn, I'd say the opposite.

You obviously don't understand the fact that one really has to play FF 40% game time if both play in the same game.  Preuss is too slow in defensive mode as KPP.

If you can't work that out...Wow-wee.

 

I may have interpreted the OP incorrectly but I thought it was referring to trading Gawn. Gawn’s contract is up at the end of 2021, so he has two years left which is the amount of time @picket fence refers to. @picket fence can you please clarify? 


You need more than 1 ruck on your list. That's why we got Preuss, and that's why neither he or Gawn (WTF!) will be traded.

We're not going to start threads for every yobbo that dials up SEN are we?

 

13 minutes ago, TGR said:

If we didn't have Gawn, I'd say the opposite.

You obviously don't understand the fact that one really has to play FF 40% game time if both play in the same game.  Preuss is too slow in defensive mode as KPP.

If you can't work that out...Wow-wee.

 

But you want to get rid of the only viable fill in for Max if he goes down.

I don't care if they both play in the same team or not, I care about not having any decent ruck replacement for Max.

Double wow if you can't work that out.

BTW, the guy who rucked to give Preuss a break on sunday is out for the year. Makes his position on the list even more important.

I preferred it when SEN had Finey and Stephen J Peake. It was babble, sure, but at least it was occasionally funny babble. I'm pretty sure North Korea played half an hour of Kane Cornes to Alex Sigley. All it took.

 
  • Author
3 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I may have interpreted the OP incorrectly but I thought it was referring to trading Gawn. Gawn’s contract is up at the end of 2021, so he has two years left which is the amount of time @picket fence refers to. @picket fence can you please clarify? 

Gday Ethan the way I heard it SEN believe he is signed till end 2020? Others might know more.

FWIW I reckon we can and should play both for the rest of this year and beyond!

Pruess played a Crackin Game yesterday!

2 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Gday Ethan the way I heard it SEN believe he is signed till end 2020? Others might know more.

FWIW I reckon we can and should play both for the rest of this year and beyond!

Pruess played a Crackin Game yesterday!

According to our "never wrong" contracts thread.. signed until end of 2021


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    It was bad enough that the Melbourne Football Club created yet another humiliating scenario inside its wretched season at Marvel Stadium last Sunday, but the final insult is that it has been commanded to return to the scene of the crime to inflict further punishment on its fans this week. Incidentally, if this match preview, of a game that promises to be one of the most unattractive fixtures in the history of the game, happens to cut out of your computer screen three quarters of the way through, it’s no coincidence. I’ll be mirroring the Demons’ lacklustre effort against St Kilda from last Sunday when they conceded the largest last quarter turnaround for victory in the history of the game.

      • Shocked
      • Thanks
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 9 replies
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 484 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Sad
      • Clap
      • Like
    • 27 replies