billyblanks35 33 Posted August 10, 2019 Posted August 10, 2019 We don't want Rowell. Another small mid. I'd go Serong as a small fwd but Anderson is what we need. 1 Quote
Dee tention 619 Posted August 10, 2019 Posted August 10, 2019 I’m ok to trade Pick 2 for Hill. As long as Langdon is part of it. If not, I would stick with Anderson. Quote
Ethan Tremblay 31,389 Posted August 14, 2019 Posted August 14, 2019 On 7/29/2019 at 5:05 PM, Dee tention said: Dees without doubt need to keep Pick 2. I know the club is into I think it’s 4th year of a 5 year plan to win a premiership. But trading away an Anderson is beyond stupid. Aka Josh Kelly trade... Trade a senior player or two and 2nd round pick for Langdon and Hill if we are chasing both. I believe Freo will ask for Brayshaw... On 8/5/2019 at 8:50 PM, Dee tention said: If we have Pick 3. I think we trade it for Hill and Langdon. Pull the trigger on that one... And we definitely go for Tomlinson to play back with ‘May Day’ and ‘Lever to Beaver’. Versatile player! He would be a great get. What made you change your mind in the span of just over a week? Trading pick 2 (as it stands) for Hill and Langdon would be a terrible decision, especially when there’s a good chance we could draft Anderson. Quote
Watts the matter 1,235 Posted August 14, 2019 Posted August 14, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said: What made you change your mind in the span of just over a week? Trading pick 2 (as it stands) for Hill and Langdon would be a terrible decision, especially when there’s a good chance we could draft Anderson. He hasn't, one post is about pick 2 and one is about pick 3. Edit - Just saw you didn't quote his latest post. Agree with you Ethan. Edited August 14, 2019 by Watts the matter Quote
spirit of norm smith 16,679 Posted August 15, 2019 Posted August 15, 2019 Brad Hill is saints or Dockers in 2020. Likely onboard with the Saints. Adds even more pace and class to push Saints into finals contender. 1 Quote
Bates Mate 4,520 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Latest report saying Saints are into him for 900k per year. He is a good player but I think that's overs 3 1 Quote
Watts the matter 1,235 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 8 minutes ago, Bates Mate said: Latest report saying Saints are into him for 900k per year. He is a good player but I think that's overs At that price they are welcome to him. 2 Quote
whatwhat say what 23,872 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Steven to Cats, Kelly to Freo, Brad Hill to Saints, and various draft picks changing hands too Kerrrazy money for Hill I would’ve thought Quote
Lord Travis 10,819 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Target Langdon. Much better value financially, cheaper trade option, and 3-4 years younger too. No to Hill, especially at 900k! That’s superstar money, and he’s no superstar, just a good outside player. 1 Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Saints are screwing themselves. between Brad Hill and Dan Hannebry they'll have 1.7 mil per locked up. incredible 2 Quote
Dirts 429 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Watts the matter said: At that price they are welcome to him. Saints are the new north Melbourne. Throwing cash around. problem is, when you park your cash into too many roll Royce’s the service and insurance cost will kill you. Quote
olisik 4,060 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Bates Mate said: Latest report saying Saints are into him for 900k per year. He is a good player but I think that's overs Would cost them pick 5 to match. 1 Quote
deebug 1,754 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 900k for Hill, ? So off to the saints it is then. Quote
Demon Disciple 12,537 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 1 hour ago, olisik said: Would cost them pick 5 to match. On that coin, one would think so, yeah. Quote
whatwhat say what 23,872 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 In terms of cap usage, Brad Hill + Dan Hannebery = Jake Lever + Steve May 2 Quote
Moonshadow 17,678 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 4 hours ago, Bates Mate said: Latest report saying Saints are into him for 900k per year. He is a good player but I think that's overs Surely they can't get him and King from GCS? Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 1 hour ago, whatwhatsaywhat said: In terms of cap usage, Brad Hill + Dan Hannebery = Jake Lever + Steve May I know which one of those options i'd rather. May has looked very good when on the park and Lever has been down, but we know his best is very good. both with be fine. Burgess will have them fighting fit next season. 4 Quote
RedLegs23 1,139 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Just reported on SEN - Brad Hill doesn’t want to play for the Dees. Ed Langdon in the box seat to land with us. Quote
Ethan Tremblay 31,389 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Reports this morning that the Dees are in the box seat to land Langdon, I believe this was already reported yesterday on Demonland. How does he do it? #ETdoesitagain #Numberonenewsbreaker #ETthetradebreaker 1 Quote
dazzledavey36 56,347 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 18 minutes ago, RedLegs23 said: Just reported on SEN - Brad Hill doesn’t want to play for the Dees. Ed Langdon in the box seat to land with us. Good Quote
Wells 11 5,503 Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 29 minutes ago, RedLegs23 said: Just reported on SEN - Brad Hill doesn’t want to play for the Dees. Ed Langdon in the box seat to land with us. translated meaning = we're not offering him enough. Quote
Demonland 74,457 Posted August 20, 2019 Posted August 20, 2019 Sadly we're not a destination club unless we're willing and able to pay overs. 2 Quote
DemonLad5 1,642 Posted August 20, 2019 Posted August 20, 2019 We were going to end up giving up pick 2 for Hill anyway which I wasn't comfortable with Happy to secure Langdon along with another outside mid and hopefully some forwardline scoring power Quote
Redjacket 760 Posted August 20, 2019 Posted August 20, 2019 11 minutes ago, Demonland said: Sadly we're not a destination club unless we're willing and able to pay overs. [censored] this. either we [censored] money down the toilet or sell the farm for injury prone players. surprised we haven't been sold the Sydney Harbour Bridge as our HQ. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.