Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Hi Admin

anything you guys can do to avoid RFC banner ads on Demonland - it’s offensive .

thiight they were related to browsing history but I’ve never browsed that kind of dirty trash before 

 

I for one am perfectly happy for Richmond to subsidize Demonland. :D Personally I find Richmond quite ignorable.

 
7 hours ago, Fitz Fitzpatrick said:

Hi Admin

anything you guys can do to avoid RFC banner ads on Demonland - it’s offensive .

thiight they were related to browsing history but I’ve never browsed that kind of dirty trash before 

The algorithm for which ads you get served isn't solely based on browser history. The advertiser might have certain search words that this site being an AFL footy related site match. Or perhaps the tigers are trying to convert non-believers. 

The best way not to see any ads at all is to support Demonland by taking out a Subscription which removes the ads entirely. 

http://demonland.com/forums/subscriptions/

I agree that it’s wrong on environmental grounds to encourage any Tiger fan who wanders here to buy a membership. When those plastic cards go into the microwave after we give them a whopping on Anzac Eve, then we will surely be responsible for releasing all of those smouldering plastic fumes into the atmosphere?


1 hour ago, Demonland said:

The advertiser might have certain search words...

Aha! That explains why I only get ads for porn sites. 

I encourage everyone to click on it as many times as possible.  They can pollute our screens for free, but as soon as anyone clicks on it they pay money.  I’m sure we can ensure they make a loss in 2019

 
4 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

The best way not to see any ads at all is to support Demonland by taking out a Subscription which removes the ads entirely. 

http://demonland.com/forums/subscriptions/

I just subscribed, and I asked Admin how many Demonlanders there were and how many were subscribers. I was surprised by the response:

"There are over 5,000 registered members of Demonland. About 280 are subscribers. These numbers don't take into account guests who visit the site but have never signed up. More guests are reading the site at any one time than members reading the site."

It would be nice for the percentage of subscribers to increase to support the running of this site. I mean we all enjoy it, but only about 5% are financially supporting it. With a lifetime membership of only $60, that, for some of the younger ones on here will work out to be about $1 a year. Where else can you get such great entertainment for just $1 a year?

 Let alone politics free literary genius......


I encourage everyone to sign up. I got horribly drunk a while back and attempted to buy a life membership, but the payment process glitched and it didn't go through. I couldn't change my mind when i sobered up as that would have made me feel, ..... dirty?

Anyway, i feel slightly less  bannable with "Life Member" next to my name. Most likely a false sense of security, but i am happy to run with it :)

If you can afford it, i think it makes sense to add it to your support of MFC. Life membership is a long time for most people. 

*I expect Demonland to add an extra thousand or so likes to my total for this shameless plug

9 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

I just subscribed, and I asked Admin how many Demonlanders there were and how many were subscribers. I was surprised by the response:

"There are over 5,000 registered members of Demonland. About 280 are subscribers. These numbers don't take into account guests who visit the site but have never signed up. More guests are reading the site at any one time than members reading the site."

It would be nice for the percentage of subscribers to increase to support the running of this site. I mean we all enjoy it, but only about 5% are financially supporting it. With a lifetime membership of only $60, that, for some of the younger ones on here will work out to be about $1 a year. Where else can you get such great entertainment for just $1 a year?

Amazed there is so few members, more so sad. This is a great site for fans and regular readers and readers should show some support to Andy and subscribe.

 

Surely the cost of servicing the Range Rover is not so much that we can’t have more members here...

Happy to have signed up and to support Andy.   Also happy that when my wife looks over my shoulder at what I'm doing she doesn't see those annoying Dating site ads targeted at old people!

1 hour ago, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

Amazed there is so few members, more so sad. This is a great site for fans and regular readers and readers should show some support to Andy and subscribe.

 

Surely the cost of servicing the Range Rover is not so much that we can’t have more members here...

I have subscribed before.. a couple of times.

But then get hounded for some profanity which everyone does now...  but the site filter blanks them out. and they continue on without any land comments.

I've been hounded by the likes of that whiny rhino, for daring to be different to his views...  I've been suspended/banned for daring to resist the ideas that treat women different to men, that they deserve more respect...

I differ, after being abused and molested by that same gender.  And then get banned.

 

I have already payed many times, including donating to resurrect Demonology...  when it was offline.

 

I have subscribed, and without any income... no pension no dole nothing. no income of any sort with the interest rates.

Living off the bank account, until I run out, of time.

1 hour ago, DV8 said:

I have subscribed before.. a couple of times.

But then get hounded for some profanity which everyone does now...  but the site filter blanks them out. and they continue on without any land comments.

I've been hounded by the likes of that whiny rhino, for daring to be different to his views...  I've been suspended/banned for daring to resist the ideas that treat women different to men, that they deserve more respect...

I differ, after being abused and molested by that same gender.  And then get banned.

 

I have already payed many times, including donating to resurrect Demonology...  when it was offline.

 

I have subscribed, and without any income... no pension no dole nothing. no income of any sort with the interest rates.

Living off the bank account, until I run out, of time.

You were justifiably banned.

Edited by Rod Grinter Riot Squad


Great site as we all know.

Please support and every now and then send a donation to keep the wonderful work going.

I find the match day threads particularly therapeutic.

One only has to look at the podcast guests to understand the actual not to mention potential reach a site such as this can have.

Thanks Andy and Nasher and all those who keep the site ticking over.

PS: I found this site around 2001 or slightly after so it has become part of my MFC life. Most posters are courteous and it's great to get different views. Long may it prosper.

Edited by Diamond_Jim

I think when you consider the time and efforts that go into running a website like this one it makes sense to subscribe or donate. I've been on DL a long time and although I've had on-off periods on here it's always been there and I'm grateful for that.

The site is run by great people and we are getting more and more brilliant content all the time with things like the podcast which has become a staple for me during the week. 

Every bit counts, doesn't take much.

Click on the ads and do your bit to waste their advertising budget.

On 2/10/2019 at 12:38 AM, Fitz Fitzpatrick said:

Hi Admin

anything you guys can do to avoid RFC banner ads on Demonland - it’s offensive .

thiight they were related to browsing history but I’ve never browsed that kind of dirty trash before 

Agree this is a farce. Ive bwen getting Volvo and Want Mature ads. Whats up with that?? 

On 2/10/2019 at 10:26 PM, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

Amazed there is so few members, more so sad. This is a great site for fans and regular readers and readers should show some support to Andy and subscribe.

 

Surely the cost of servicing the Range Rover is not so much that we can’t have more members here...

I initially read this as "the cost of servicing Range Rover" and thought that the post was something to do with the site's administrators dealing with one of Demonland's posters who seemed to require significant amounts of moderation.

(People who have been on Demonland for a while will know what I'm talking about.)


On 2/10/2019 at 5:26 AM, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

Surely the cost of servicing the Range Rover is not so much that we can’t have more members here...

Haha I think $60 barely covers the cost of brake light bulb on a Jaguar

Join the hunt ?? Who the hell wants to do that ??

I wish Richmond supporters had aphrodisiac qualities, then they could stop shooting  the real tigers and just 'go', the Tiger supporting ferals.   Win/ Win

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 191 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies