Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yet he's listed as 3 to 4 weeks away on the MFC website.. 

Who the [censored] runs the MFC website these day's..

According to https://www.melbournefc.com.au/club/people/staff-members, Ryan Larkin is the Department GM for Marketing, Communications and Digital and there would be a team below him who do most of the work.  If you have a grievance, the list is there for all to see.  Caitlin Nobes and Ben Gibson seem the most active in terms of the content on the Website.

Edited by DemonWorshipper

 

I'm about 3-4 weeks away from checking myself in for psychotherapy where i'll spend ............ 3-4 weeks. That should see out the footy season.

 

 

On 7/12/2019 at 12:10 PM, Redleg said:

Melksham getting close to missing the rest of the season.

I wonder how many clubs have lost 4 players for an entire season, before it even started and then several others who end up missing most of the season after playing a game or two?

kero wilson claims we are exaggerating injuries and other clubs have had it worse than us this year

i'd like to see an updated games-lost-this-year-to-best-22 (make it best 25 to make choice easier)

5 hours ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

I like how they stated cautious approach, what were they doing for the other foot injuries?

Possibly not enough:

“This has probably been a little bit longer than we’d planned as well, but with your feet, we know through Jack Viney and Aaron vandenBerg and a few others … you don’t want to muck around with them too much,” Melksham said.

I guess 'a few others' include Trengove and Clarke.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 
1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

kero wilson claims we are exaggerating injuries and other clubs have had it worse than us this year

i'd like to see an updated games-lost-this-year-to-best-22 (make it best 25 to make choice easier)

Without counting the games others have had it pretty bad (for long term injury absences ie > 3 weeks):

Richmond:  Cotchin, Rance, Reiwoldt, Nankervis (ie their spine) missing for most of the season.  Houli, Astbury, Vlaustin (most of their backline) out for a fair chunk early in the season.

St Kilda:  Geary, McCartin, Hannebury, Stevens, Longer, Roberton, Carlisle mostly didn't have a preseason or out most of the year and all but Carlisle are still out.

The above players would be in their respective best 10.  So not much different to our best 10 absentees of > 3 weeks:   May, Lever, Melksham, Jetta, Hannan, Lewis.

Collingwood have also had a few significant outs.

The difference between those teams and us is they are not bleating about it. 

I don't agree with Caro that we are exaggerating them but it suits our narrative to use 'preseason/injuries' to answer any questions about poor form.  Like us fans, the media know a lot of other things aren't working and so have stopped buying this narrative that the club is trying to sell. 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Without counting the games others have had it pretty bad (for long term injury absences ie > 3 weeks):

Richmond:  Cotchin, Rance, Reiwoldt, Nankervis (ie their spine) missing for most of the season.  Houli, Astbury, Vlaustin (most of their backline) out for a fair chunk early in the season.

St Kilda:  Geary, McCartin, Hannebury, Stevens, Longer, Roberton, Carlisle mostly didn't have a preseason or out most of the year and all but Carlisle are still out.

The above players would be in their respective best 10.  So not much different to our best 10 absentees of > 3 weeks:   May, Lever, Melksham, Jetta, Hannan, Lewis.

Collingwood have also had a few significant outs.

The difference between those teams and us is they are not bleating about it. 

I don't agree with Caro that we are exaggerating them but it suits our narrative to use 'preseason/injuries' to answer any questions about poor form.  Like us fans, the media know a lot of other things aren't working and so have stopped buying this narrative that the club is trying to sell. 

i agree quite a few teams have been hit by injuries. in fact i'd like to see year by year stats for the whole competition as i get the feeling that this year has been a shocker for injuries and missed games for the afl. it got me thinking if the rule changes/interpretations plus the defensive game plans of coaches, coupled with the rotation and more fatigue is contributing to a growing toll of injuries, and a more unattractive game......and of course the bias towards athleticism and physical conditioning at the expense of skills and natural flair....... many are saying carlton and norf are doing better with caretaker coaches as they are being given more freedom to players to play to their natural individual skills and football instincts

Edited by daisycutter


It's too simplistic to just add up total missed weeks.  There are many other factors, such as depth available, nature of missing personnel, timing of injuries (eg early in season resulting losses can lead to loss of confidence and a downward spiral).   

 Not that that is a complete explanation/excuse for where we are, but it seems every second match we'd lose 2-3 players with no one of note to replace them and endlessly fielding teams with players who haven't played together or entire lines missing best 22.   I haven't followed other teams injuries as closely, but I can't recall a worse run for us than we have had this year. Perhaps others can.

2 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Without counting the games others have had it pretty bad (for long term injury absences ie > 3 weeks):

Richmond:  Cotchin, Rance, Reiwoldt, Nankervis (ie their spine) missing for most of the season.  Houli, Astbury, Vlaustin (most of their backline) out for a fair chunk early in the season.

St Kilda:  Geary, McCartin, Hannebury, Stevens, Longer, Roberton, Carlisle mostly didn't have a preseason or out most of the year and all but Carlisle are still out.

The above players would be in their respective best 10.  So not much different to our best 10 absentees of > 3 weeks:   May, Lever, Melksham, Jetta, Hannan, Lewis.

Collingwood have also had a few significant outs.

The difference between those teams and us is they are not bleating about it. 

I don't agree with Caro that we are exaggerating them but it suits our narrative to use 'preseason/injuries' to answer any questions about poor form.  Like us fans, the media know a lot of other things aren't working and so have stopped buying this narrative that the club is trying to sell. 

The lack of pre-season due to surgery and injury set us back. The injuries during the year killed us.

We will never know but we may have been able to deal with one but we and no other team could have a good year with both.

To compare other teams injury list without including pre-season is ignorant.


47 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Rather than start another thread. 

 

Poor Jesse

3 hours ago, daisycutter said:

kero wilson claims we are exaggerating injuries and other clubs have had it worse than us this year

i'd like to see an updated games-lost-this-year-to-best-22 (make it best 25 to make choice easier)

Yes DC I watched Footy Classified where she labelled our injury excuses pathetic, although I don’t know that the club has officially been claiming that as the main issue, others in the media have but there was the Misson injury analysis given to the board that got out I suppose. But then Caro just 10 minutes later was defending the GWS’s drop off in performance listing their injuries over the past 3 years! I mean injuries do make a difference and if any team could cover injuries it should be GWS with their extensive list of high draft picks, surely. Injuries don’t fully explain our fall from grace but they are part of the equation and I was not aware of Goodwin going on and on about them. 

2 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Yes DC I watched Footy Classified where she labelled our injury excuses pathetic, although I don’t know that the club has officially been claiming that as the main issue, others in the media have but there was the Misson injury analysis given to the board that got out I suppose. But then Caro just 10 minutes later was defending the GWS’s drop off in performance listing their injuries over the past 3 years! I mean injuries do make a difference and if any team could cover injuries it should be GWS with their extensive list of high draft picks, surely. Injuries don’t fully explain our fall from grace but they are part of the equation and I was not aware of Goodwin going on and on about them. 

I agree - Goodwin hasn't been going on and on about them.  The media might be, and the fans (like myself) will bring it up as part of the explanation for the season we're having, but I don't think the club has made a big deal out of it at all.  I think Goodwin plays a pretty straight bat about it.

The fact is that we've had off season surgeries and numerous injuries at different times to deal with.  We need to learn to handle it better, but the fact is that we've had a large number of them and it's tough to overcome.

It isn't just Goodwin talking about 'the preseason'.  Listen to the Mahoney and Bartlett interviews of recent weeks.

Goodwin's references to 'the preseason' are now less direct  eg in this weeks press conf he said something like:  the reason (for why we are where we are) is well documented and we are addressing those reasons.   That sounds like 'the preseason'/injuries reason.

Not too long ago Viney said something about preseason problems 'but they aren't an excuse'.

i think these comments are valid but I use them to illustrate the club, as a whole, is still talking 'the preseason'/injuries.  I do not think we are exaggerating the preseason/injury problem but it may sound like we are if our senior people keep talking about it.

Other clubs in as bad a predicament as us:  Richmond (key injuries to top 10 players) and St Kilda (key injuries to top 10 players in the preseason who have barely played this year) haven't been playing 'the preseason' or 'the injury' card. 

I just think the club as a whole needs to stop talking or referring to 'the preseason' or injuries.  Move on.  Not all journo's are dumb.  They know that 'the preseason/injuries' are only part of the problem.  So far they haven't used the blowtorch to dig deeper.  It may yet come.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


57 minutes ago, Hell Bent said:

AVB is listed as TEST. 

Would be awesome to see him play the last couple of games.

 

why does my MFCSS automatically add the rider.... just in time for next year's injury

What’s the go with KK? Has been TBC for ages and haven’t been mentioned recently. Is he done? 

 
On 7/19/2019 at 6:58 PM, Wrecker45 said:

The lack of pre-season due to surgery and injury set us back. The injuries during the year killed us.

We will never know but we may have been able to deal with one but we and no other team could have a good year with both.

To compare other teams injury list without including pre-season is ignorant.

I simply don't understand why people (fans, media people and a high proportion of dl posters) can't understand that simple fact.

Leaving aside that it is well documented having a high percentage of your list completing a high percentage of preseason sessions is critical to having a successful year it is plain as day we are strugglong to run out quarters ans games.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 255 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies