Jump to content

Featured Replies

42 minutes ago, Jaded said:

I still can’t believe Norf fans exist. Like I know they do, and each one of them is a [censored], but like why?

Uhm because they’ve had a lot more success than Melb in our lifetimes? Good on them for sticking by the club. 

 
Just now, Cards13 said:

Uhm because they’ve had a lot more success than Melb in our lifetimes? Good on them for sticking by the club. 

real talk right now

3 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

We would not be trading Brayden Preuss if we weren't extremely confident Luke Jackson was going to extend his contract. 

Not traded yet and he is deciding to leave, so no correlation to Jackson’s intentions.

 
2 minutes ago, Cards13 said:

Uhm because they’ve had a lot more success than Melb in our lifetimes? Good on them for sticking by the club. 

Good get Cards. Four flags in 45 years for a club with limited resources is a marvellous effort. 

11 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Good get Cards. Four flags in 45 years for a club with limited resources is a marvellous effort. 

Truth is given North’s relative success it actually shows that having success is one piece of the puzzle, being able to capitalise on it is another. Given their 90s they should be a powerhouse. 

Since 2000 they haven’t had anything to ride home about and been sitting comfortably in mediocrity ever since, unwilling to ever bottom out properly (no choice now). I’m not saying we’ve been any better because we haven’t.

Edited by Pates


43 minutes ago, Pates said:

Truth is given North’s relative success it actually shows that having success is one piece of the puzzle, being able to capitalise on it is another. Given their 90s they should be a powerhouse. 

Since 2000 they haven’t had anything to ride home about and been sitting comfortably in mediocrity ever since, unwilling to ever bottom out properly (no choice now). I’m not saying we’ve been any better because we haven’t.

Reminds me of someone!

43 minutes ago, Pates said:

Truth is given North’s relative success it actually shows that having success is one piece of the puzzle, being able to capitalise on it is another. Given their 90s they should be a powerhouse. 

Since 2000 they haven’t had anything to ride home about and been sitting comfortably in mediocrity ever since, unwilling to ever bottom out properly (no choice now). I’m not saying we’ve been any better because we haven’t.

Truth is, they've one one flag every 11 years on average for 45 years. In the period, that record is only bettered by Carlscum, and Horethorn. 

1 hour ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Good get Cards. Four flags in 45 years for a club with limited resources is a marvellous effort. 

Better than none in my 43 years hey QD, but what id iot fans?! 

Edited by Cards13
Lol that [censored] is censored

 
16 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Truth is, they've one one flag every 11 years on average for 45 years. In the period, that record is only bettered by Carlscum, and Horethorn. 

We’d be close to that over 60 years... ?

25 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Truth is, they've one one flag every 11 years on average for 45 years. In the period, that record is only bettered by Carlscum, and Horethorn. 

I'm not arguing their onfield success hasn't been good, of course I'm bloody envious. But many of us bemoan the fact that during the AFL's transition from semi-professional into elite sport we were garbage meant that we missed out on the opportunity to be a bigger and better club. North had that but are still in the position they are where they're fighting to survive, I'm just pointing out that they failed to capitalise when they had their chance, they should be a powerhouse with that success but they aren't. 

 

download.jpeg

Edited by Pates


1 hour ago, rpfc said:

Not traded yet and he is deciding to leave, so no correlation to Jackson’s intentions.

Disagree, bad business for the MFC to give him our blessing to assess his options, and allow him to select a desired new home and then block it at the last minute. i think the club would have a reason to be confident of Jacksons intentions to stick around before those steps were taken. even if it were verbal. 

2 hours ago, P-man said:

What’s wrong with Milkshake? Geeze. Next you’ll be telling me that Pedo and Fritzl aren’t good nicknames.

That's Rolfe to you!

Another one for the good guys.

Treloar is an interesting one, keep an eye on.

1 hour ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Truth is, they've one one flag every 11 years on average for 45 years. In the period, that record is only bettered by Carlscum, and Horethorn. 

What about Essendon't?

3 hours ago, P-man said:

What’s wrong with Milkshake? Geeze. Next you’ll be telling me that Pedo and Fritzl aren’t good nicknames.

More #pedofacts !


3 hours ago, Pates said:

Truth is given North’s relative success it actually shows that having success is one piece of the puzzle, being able to capitalise on it is another. Given their 90s they should be a powerhouse. 

Since 2000 they haven’t had anything to ride home about and been sitting comfortably in mediocrity ever since, unwilling to ever bottom out properly (no choice now). I’m not saying we’ve been any better because we haven’t.

Personally i thought they did have a chance to become a powerhouse club if they re-located. unfortunately sentiment prevented that from happening but it did feel there was an opportunity missed there in my view. 

3 hours ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Truth is, they've one one flag every 11 years on average for 45 years. In the period, that record is only bettered by Carlscum, and Horethorn. 

We won on average a flag every 9 years since the start of WW2.

Edited by america de cali


3 hours ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Truth is, they've one one flag every 11 years on average for 45 years. In the period, that record is only bettered by Carlscum, and Horethorn. 

Richmond 82, 17, 19, 20 

Essendon 84, 85, 93 , 00 

West Coast 92, 94, 06, 18 

6 hours ago, rpfc said:

Not traded yet and he is deciding to leave, so no correlation to Jackson’s intentions.

Would be very surprised if he wasn't pushed.

So Demonlanders.  What is Ben Brown worth? 
 

Brown for MFC 2020 Pick 25* (ie. Hawks 2nd rounder) ?

or 

Brown & NMFC 2021 3rd round pick for
MFC 2020 Pick Pick 25* ?

 

 

Can someone explain why when North show him the door they can expect much in return? 

29 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

So Demonlanders.  What is Ben Brown worth? 
 

Brown for MFC 2020 Pick 25* (ie. Hawks 2nd rounder) ?

or 

Brown & NMFC 2021 3rd round pick for
MFC 2020 Pick Pick 25* ?

 

I would say Brown for pick 25 would get it done, and get it done early.

North might push for something extra though.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 23 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 59 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 22 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 248 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland