Jump to content

Patrick McCartin


Whispering_Jack

Recommended Posts

If StKilda are tossing up between Petracca and McCartin at pick one, surely we will pick him up at three if they don't.

If they take him, it'll be Petracca and Brayshaw......all big bodied,which is what we really need,because we can't afford to wait 3 or 4 years for someone skinny with talent to develop.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well apparently we are only interested in Brayshaw, Petracca, McCartin and Wright.

I'll be stoked with Brayshaw and McCartin or Brayshaw and Petracca!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't it Slug Jordan that said he only wanted players that had a bit of c**t about them? From what I can gather McCartin has that in spades. Throws his body around, not afraid to impose himself, likes a contest, big on physicality.

No more delicate petals please.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Jon Ralph in todays Herald Sun:

"The Demons must make a decision on Luke Tapscott before the October 31 trade period and seem certain to take midfielder Angus Brayshaw and key forward Patrick McCartin with picks two and three"

I'm sorry but i will not believe any of the cr@p coming out of this buffoons mouth. He was on SEN swearing black and blue that Goodwin was going to be announced as the new Crows coach, at the same time Melbourne were holding a press conference announcing we had just appointed him to be our head coach to be. The guy's a clown and not a very good journalist imo. Would do well working for a rag mag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything to be read into the article on McCartin on the AFL site this morning regarding the Swans, Essendrug & us not sending recruiters on the AIS-AFL Academy tour?

Does this mean Roos has already decided who we want at 2 & 3?

If so, does it mean that McCartin is "in" or "out"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On one side I love his aggression, attack on the ball and man, size and commitment to contests. I love natural footballers. Something the MFC has lacked for long time.

On the other hand, I am concerned about his lack of apparent fitness and the possibility that he will be a bit one dimensional in the forward line, and that at AFL level, he may be found lacking as other players are now equal to him in size, negating his main advantage from his junior days.

If the under 18s version of McCartin is what we will get at AFL then he is a good pick up, but I'm concerned out won't translate and that a mid will be a safer bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The tour was much earlier in the year wasn't it? We wouldn't have known if we had picks 2 & 3 at the time.

Yes, around April. Possibly a funding issue for us, especially if we were intending to trade the pick(s) at that stage of the year. Money better spent elsewhere.

Also, Taylor got into a stoush on a previous Academy tour, maybe that factored in as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in regards to those saying McCartin is only an old-school key forward, I highly recommend reading the following from the AFL website's going places.

With teammate Dylan Hodge's ankle injury restricting him to deep in attack, McCartin played a new role, roaming further up the ground and took 11 marks.

He's heard people question whether he is one-dimensional, and whether he would stand up to the aerobic rigours of back-and-forth modern football at the top level. He thinks he answered those queries.

"I feel people might pigeonhole me as an old-school key forward who doesn't move outside the 50," McCartin says.

"But when I get a chance to play up the ground I usually do it pretty well. It's more been about opportunities. That's been my role to play as a deeper forward and make a contest a bit deeper.

"I'm not too bad about going up the ground," he says.

"That game gave people a look to see that I can do it, it's just that the opportunity hasn't been there.

"It can be a bit annoying that I feel confident in my own ability, but I'm not really worried about what anyone thinks, apart from the team I'm playing for."

Source:

http://www.afl.com.a...fl-clubs-circle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in regards to those saying McCartin is only an old-school key forward, I highly recommend reading the following from the AFL website's going places.

With teammate Dylan Hodge's ankle injury restricting him to deep in attack, McCartin played a new role, roaming further up the ground and took 11 marks.

He's heard people question whether he is one-dimensional, and whether he would stand up to the aerobic rigours of back-and-forth modern football at the top level. He thinks he answered those queries.

"I feel people might pigeonhole me as an old-school key forward who doesn't move outside the 50," McCartin says.

"But when I get a chance to play up the ground I usually do it pretty well. It's more been about opportunities. That's been my role to play as a deeper forward and make a contest a bit deeper.

"I'm not too bad about going up the ground," he says.

"That game gave people a look to see that I can do it, it's just that the opportunity hasn't been there.

"It can be a bit annoying that I feel confident in my own ability, but I'm not really worried about what anyone thinks, apart from the team I'm playing for."

Source:

http://www.afl.com.a...fl-clubs-circle

Well he has confidence in his ability and that is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't it Slug Jordan that said he only wanted players that had a bit of c**t about them? From what I can gather McCartin has that in spades. Throws his body around, not afraid to impose himself, likes a contest, big on physicality.

No more delicate petals please.

Agreed! I don't reckon you can go wrong with McCartin. He may not be an out-and-out star down the track (impossible to predict which of these kids will be). But highly rated big-bodied kids who like a contest normally have long careers at this level.

I would have liked another midfielder in Brayshaw's class (doesn't seem to be one). I also liked the look of Lever's highlights. However, I can't see McCartin being a failure in the AFL. That has to be appealing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in regards to those saying McCartin is only an old-school key forward, I highly recommend reading the following from the AFL website's going places.

With teammate Dylan Hodge's ankle injury restricting him to deep in attack, McCartin played a new role, roaming further up the ground and took 11 marks.

He's heard people question whether he is one-dimensional, and whether he would stand up to the aerobic rigours of back-and-forth modern football at the top level. He thinks he answered those queries."I feel people might pigeonhole me as an old-school key forward who doesn't move outside the 50," McCartin says."But when I get a chance to play up the ground I usually do it pretty well. It's more been about opportunities. That's been my role to play as a deeper forward and make a contest a bit deeper."I'm not too bad about going up the ground," he says."That game gave people a look to see that I can do it, it's just that the opportunity hasn't been there."It can be a bit annoying that I feel confident in my own ability, but I'm not really worried about what anyone thinks, apart from the team I'm playing for."

Source:

http://www.afl.com.a...fl-clubs-circle

So... McCartin thinks he did well when playing further upfield... And that's it?

No one else to support his theory? It's not even someone else's opinion, it's his own!

That is supposed to give him credibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So... McCartin thinks he did well when playing further upfield... And that's it?

No one else to support his theory? It's not even someone else's opinion, it's his own!

That is supposed to give him credibility?

In all fairness it is hard to tell. In juniors he is asked to stay inside the forward 50 as they know he won't be beaten. It doesn't mean he won't be good around the ground.

It's going to be a hard decision, glad it's not me and especially glad it's not BP.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So... McCartin thinks he did well when playing further upfield... And that's it?

No one else to support his theory? It's not even someone else's opinion, it's his own!

That is supposed to give him credibility?

It's got a lot more credibility that your theory that Lever would make a good midfielder, despite him never having played there, which is based on, well, nothing really. :wacko:

Edited by TheoX
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So... McCartin thinks he did well when playing further upfield... And that's it?

No one else to support his theory? It's not even someone else's opinion, it's his own!

That is supposed to give him credibility?

He's played well when higher up the ground. Why you would want to use a beast with prescient leading ability up the ground is beyond me. Only question mark on the kid is his health.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So... McCartin thinks he did well when playing further upfield... And that's it?

No one else to support his theory? It's not even someone else's opinion, it's his own!

That is supposed to give him credibility?

It's got a lot more credibility that your theory that Lever would make a good midfielder, despite him never having played there.

Theo's got a point here, Machsy. Lever has also said he'd "like to play in the midfield", yet he too has never played there. Anyway, the fact is one is a key defender, the other a key forward. If we are going a key position player with Petracca being off the board, McCartin/Wright would be better bets than Lever in my opinion. They both have exposed form over the past 12-18 months (Lever doesn't). Lever is coming off a knee reco, and as mentioned earlier, he's a key back. Quality key backs, I think you'll find, are much easier to pick up later in the draft than quality key forwards.

If we are desperate to pick a midfielder, Laverde should be the go after Petracca and Brayshaw. Personally though, I think we should be picking McCartin or Wright. Lever would be my last preference of that lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the game has and will continue to change, but Matthew Lloyd and Fevola were pretty handy one-dimensional stay at home full forwards (Lloyd in particular looked very unco trying to do anything except mark the ball and then kick the goal). I don't think the game has evolved so much that every player in the team needs to be able to play multiple positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's got a lot more credibility that your theory that Lever would make a good midfielder, despite him never having played there, which is based on, well, nothing really. :wacko:

Comprehension issues again.

Maybe you should finish primary school before trying to comment on one of my posts.

He's played well when higher up the ground. Why you would want to use a beast with prescient leading ability up the ground is beyond me. Only question mark on the kid is his health.

I don't think the game is played like that anymore.

Name another successful key forward that stays in the F50 the same way.

Saying Hawkins may only prove your ignorance...

But I'd say he has a few more question marks; namely tank, kicking skills and agility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theo's got a point here, Machsy. Lever has also said he'd "like to play in the midfield", yet he too has never played there. Anyway, the fact is one is a key defender, the other a key forward. If we are going a key position player with Petracca being off the board, McCartin/Wright would be better bets than Lever in my opinion. They both have exposed form over the past 12-18 months (Lever doesn't). Lever is coming off a knee reco, and as mentioned earlier, he's a key back. Quality key backs, I think you'll find, are much easier to pick up later in the draft than quality key forwards.

If we are desperate to pick a midfielder, Laverde should be the go after Petracca and Brayshaw. Personally though, I think we should be picking McCartin or Wright. Lever would be my last preference of that lot.

No he doesn't.

I think Lever could make it as a mid.

What Lever thinks is irrelevant and I'm not using that as an argument for him being more worthy of selection.

Anyway, you're free to think differently.

Obviously I see Lever as worthy of pick 3, but McCartin & Wright not so much.

We'll see who's right in about 5 years' time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw a mate tweet Cal Twomey about the potential of McCartin to still go to the saints.

He said he (McCartin) is still a big chance to go number 1.

Dont rule out Petracca guys..

'Aints fans would burn down the joint if that happened. Just can't see them passing him up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comprehension issues again.

Maybe you should finish primary school before trying to comment on one of my posts.

I don't think the game is played like that anymore.

Name another successful key forward that stays in the F50 the same way.

Saying Hawkins may only prove your ignorance...

But I'd say he has a few more question marks; namely tank, kicking skills and agility.

Roughead plays primarily deep with the odd spurt in the midfield. He is very infrequently used around the 50s. Jack Riewoldt was for a long time essentially an inside 50 player. Which games have you seen McCartin play? Most games I've seen he has been completely dominant, has hurt his opponent multiple ways and been reasonably reliable in front of goal. Maybe you are only seeing him play at Kardinia Park on swirly days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    FROZEN by Whispering Jack

    Who would have thought?    Collingwood had a depleted side with several star players out injured, Max Gawn was in stellar form, Christian Petracca at the top of his game and Simon Goodwin was about to pull off a masterstroke in setting Alex Neal-Bullen onto him to do a fantastic job in subduing the Magpies' best player. Goody had his charges primed to respond robustly to the challenge of turning around their disappointing performance against Fremantle in Alice Springs. And if not that, t

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7

    TURNAROUND by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons won their first game at home this year in the traditional King’s Birthday Weekend clash with Collingwood VFL on Sunday in a dramatic turnaround on recent form that breathed new life into the beleaguered club’s season. The Demons led from the start to record a 52-point victory. It was their highest score and biggest winning margin by far for the 2024 season. Under cloudy but calm conditions for Casey Fields, the home side, wearing the old Springvale guernsey as a mark of res

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    PREGAME: Rd 15 vs North Melbourne

    After two disappointing back to back losses the Demons have the bye in Round 14 and then face perennial cellar dweller North Melbourne at the MCG on Saturday night in Round 15. Who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 151

    PODCAST: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 11th June @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG against the Magpies in the Round 13 on Kings Birthday. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. L

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 36

    VOTES: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    Captain Max Gawn has a considerable lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Alex Neal-Bullen & Jack Viney make up the Top 5. Your votes for the loss against the Magpies. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 41

    POSTGAME: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    Once again inaccuracy and inefficiency going inside 50 rears it's ugly head as the Demons suffered their second loss on the trot and their fourth loss in five games as they go down to the Pies by 38 points on Kings Birthday at the MCG.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 415

    GAMEDAY: Rd 13 vs Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons are once again faced with a classic 8 point game against a traditional rival on King's Birthday at the MCG. A famous victory will see them reclaim a place in the Top 8 whereas a loss will be another blow for their finals credentials.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 941

    BOILED LOLLIES by The Oracle

    In the space of a month Melbourne has gone from chocolates to boiled lollies in terms of its standing as a candidate for the AFL premiership.  The club faces its moment of truth against a badly bruised up Collingwood at the MCG. A win will give it some respite but even then, it won’t be regarded particularly well being against an opponent carrying the burden of an injured playing list. A loss would be a disaster. The Demons have gone from a six/two win/loss ratio and a strong percentag

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 3

    CLEAN HANDS by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons headed into town and up Sydney Road to take on the lowly Coburg Lions who have been perennial VFL easy beats and sitting on one win for the season. Last year, Casey beat them in a practice match when resting their AFL listed players. That’s how bad they were. Nobody respected them on Saturday and clearly not the Demons who came to the game with 22 players (ten MFC), but whether they came out to play is another matter because for the most part, their intensity was lacking an

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...