Jump to content

Kicking in after points



Recommended Posts

I noticed on Saturday that WCE were able to kick 55m. from the goalsquare to an unattended player who had plenty of time to spot up a target upfield.

When we kicked in, there appeared to be no options. This resulted in enormous pressure on our defenders , over and over again.

Did anyone else notice this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed on Saturday that WCE were able to kick 55m. from the goalsquare to an unattended player who had plenty of time to spot up a target upfield.

When we kicked in, there appeared to be no options. This resulted in enormous pressure on our defenders , over and over again.

Did anyone else notice this?

West Coast zoned the corridor and manned up on the flanks which left no options anywhere. Good tactics by Woosha unfortunately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that annoyed me was that there was no one running to make the second option or take the short kick in. Yes WC did it well, but the coaching staff should've been wise to it and devise ways of breaking it, instead of kicking it long and setting NikNat up for MOTY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that annoyed me was that there was no one running to make the second option or take the short kick in. Yes WC did it well, but the coaching staff should've been wise to it and devise ways of breaking it, instead of kicking it long and setting NikNat up for MOTY.

From kick-ins, how many times have we kicked long to The Russian? Surely we must have a few different options/plans to make it a bit less predictable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From kick-ins, how many times have we kicked long to The Russian? Surely we must have a few different options/plans to make it a bit less predictable?

Yeah, exactly the same plan as Fremantle, except Sandilands is a monster that has the height to out-mark every single player in the competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From kick-ins, how many times have we kicked long to The Russian? Surely we must have a few different options/plans to make it a bit less predictable?

Agree - but I think the real reason is that no-one is preared to present - too scared of making a mistake - too many willing tp take a handpass, not enough willing to get the thing in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree - but I think the real reason is that no-one is preared to present - too scared of making a mistake - too many willing tp take a handpass, not enough willing to get the thing in the first place.

Hit the nail on the head. If you watch the kick outs saturday, the kicker was searching desperately for someone to make position and no one did. We were static. That is attitude and it appeared poor early on and was borne out by our lowest number of tackles. WC did the 1 per centers and we didn't. That said the coaching was also poor as was the disposal which was atrocious. Handballs falling short or missing by metres is poor and kicking to ankle height or over the head is also poor. Le Cras received great disposal and marked accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hit the nail on the head. If you watch the kick outs saturday, the kicker was searching desperately for someone to make position and no one did. We were static. That is attitude and it appeared poor early on and was borne out by our lowest number of tackles. WC did the 1 per centers and we didn't. That said the coaching was also poor as was the disposal which was atrocious. Handballs falling short or missing by metres is poor and kicking to ankle height or over the head is also poor. Le Cras received great disposal and marked accordingly.

Well said- similar to the first game against Hawthorn. The coaching panel seems wanting sometimes.They do not seem able to get them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kick ins would have been much better had our players started to run, or at least move.

Even running in completely random directions would have created more options for the kicker. Instead we just seemed zoned off as if we were defending the kick in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But even when we have been running and up and about, we've kicked to Jamar and either roved off him or tried to cause a stoppage. This suggests to me that we have little plan or direction from the coaching staff, as to how to clear the ball out of defensive fifty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree, was the most frustrating part of the day. Reckon it went hand in hand with the majority of the team just not working hard enough on the day.

(HUGE apologies to Junior Mac and some others).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hit the nail on the head. If you watch the kick outs saturday, the kicker was searching desperately for someone to make position and no one did. We were static. That is attitude and it appeared poor early on and was borne out by our lowest number of tackles. WC did the 1 per centers and we didn't. That said the coaching was also poor as was the disposal which was atrocious. Handballs falling short or missing by metres is poor and kicking to ankle height or over the head is also poor. Le Cras received great disposal and marked accordingly.

And of course Bruce would never have the where withall to kick to self and play on forcing it to open up... Hed just panic a bit when the defender ran him and cough it up. And he neednt for he does have the close in abilities, so go figure ( he simply has no faith in his own disposals). Grimes ought to take them for now. If necessary we need two extras in defence at the moment of kick in and force a mismatch. To allow the opposition to dictate isthe first grave error, not presenting is just as bad.. wee DO have leg speed through the guts now we need to use that to circumvent the oppo's forward pressure..i.e take them on.. dont shirk the game !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said- similar to the first game against Hawthorn. The coaching panel seems wanting sometimes.They do not seem able to get them up.

If only Dave Schwarz was on the coaching panel...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mate made a suggestion for countering the "zones".

Instead of avoiding an area covered by an opposition defender, kick a high one straight above him, making sure one of our guys who can"ride" his back is within range behind him,i.e....set him up to have a "hanger" taken on him. The player leaping from behind should be able to put the opponent out of the play, and play-on downfield. Meanwhile, the "zoner" will have second thoughts about leaving himself so vulnerable again. Demons who have shown they know how to "ride" a back include Jamar, Petterd, Trengove and Jurrah.

I'm not saying we should do this every time, just keep it in mind when options are limited.

We still don't seem to have caught on to the absolute necessity of kicking in quickly, before the opposition get organised.

Also, too often after a point, 2 or 3 of our guys wander around behind the goals looking to retrieve the ball, as if hoping to be the kicker-in. Meanwhile, the opponents are able to outnumber us upfield, making zoning easier. I refer readers to my previous post on a similar topic where I suggested we have volunteer ball-retrievers behind the goals at each end.(even if they had to masquerade as photographers!)

Any other suggestions, Demonlanders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mate made a suggestion for countering the "zones".

Instead of avoiding an area covered by an opposition defender, kick a high one straight above him, making sure one of our guys who can"ride" his back is within range behind him,i.e....set him up to have a "hanger" taken on him. The player leaping from behind should be able to put the opponent out of the play, and play-on downfield. Meanwhile, the "zoner" will have second thoughts about leaving himself so vulnerable again. Demons who have shown they know how to "ride" a back include Jamar, Petterd, Trengove and Jurrah.

I'm not saying we should do this every time, just keep it in mind when options are limited.

It works each week in the schoolyard. If we are down to those tactics....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How about the old fashioned huddle. Could have at least tried it....once? too radical? better to do nothing and get slaughtered time and time again?

Edited by Tricky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said- similar to the first game against Hawthorn. The coaching panel seems wanting sometimes.They do not seem able to get them up.

I promise you the coaches did not tell players not to run and spread and create options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best thing to do at kick ins is to take the first option available. Every time. Grimes seems to do a lot of the kicking in and he seems to wait too long for the magical brilliant option to appear, when in reality all he's doing is letting the opposition fully set up a 10-12 man zone across half forward. I'd be inclined to just tell him to pick the ball up and kick it straight away to the first option he can see. Gets the game moving, gets the zone moving, gets the ball away from full back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hit the nail on the head. If you watch the kick outs saturday, the kicker was searching desperately for someone to make position and no one did. We were static. That is attitude and it appeared poor early on and was borne out by our lowest number of tackles. WC did the 1 per centers and we didn't. That said the coaching was also poor as was the disposal which was atrocious. Handballs falling short or missing by metres is poor and kicking to ankle height or over the head is also poor. Le Cras received great disposal and marked accordingly.

Yep.

Dunn would've made an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best way to sort this out......not allow so many set shots at goal, ie - too many marks inside 50.

Allowing marks inside 50 and set shots see's the opposition allowed plenty of time to set up the zone, if not then Grimey can take the extra ball straight away and get it out of there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best thing to do at kick ins is to take the first option available. Every time. Grimes seems to do a lot of the kicking in and he seems to wait too long for the magical brilliant option to appear, when in reality all he's doing is letting the opposition fully set up a 10-12 man zone across half forward. I'd be inclined to just tell him to pick the ball up and kick it straight away to the first option he can see. Gets the game moving, gets the zone moving, gets the ball away from full back.

I agree 100%. So often I find myself getting a little agitated watching us set up for kick ins. Wandering slowly over to the ball, have a think about it, have another think about it, and then NOTHING is on. Other teams seem to get on with it far morer often than we do.

Kickins have been a problem for MFC for 20 bloody years. Very strange phenomenon that has transfered to coach after coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Once again the club’s top goal scorer but he had a few uncharacteristic flat spots during the season and the club will be looking for much better from him in 2025. Date of Birth: 6 December 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 149 Goals MFC 2024: 41 Career Total: 252 Brownlow Medal Votes: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #18 Jake Melksham

    After sustaining a torn ACL in the final match of the 2023 season Jake added a bit to the attack late in the 2024 season upon his return. He has re-signed on to the Demons for 1 more season in 2025. Date of Birth: 12 August 1991 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 229 Goals MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 188

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #3 Christian Salem

    The luckless Salem suffered a hamstring injury against the Lions early in the season and, after missing a number of games, he was never at his best. He was also inconvenienced by minor niggles later in the season. This was a blow for the club that sorely needed him to fill gaps in the midfield at times as well as to do his best work in defence. Date of Birth: 15 July 1995 Height: 184cm Games MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 176 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 26 Brownlow Meda

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #39 Koltyn Tholstrop

    The first round draft pick at #13 from twelve months ago the strongly built medium forward has had an impressive introduction to AFL football and is expected to spend more midfield moments as his career progresses. Date of Birth: 25 July 2005 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 10 Goals MFC 2024: 5 Career Total: 5 Games CDFC 2024: 7 Goals CDFC 2024: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 6

    2024 Player Reviews: #42 Daniel Turner

    The move of “Disco” to a key forward post looks like bearing fruit. Turner has good hands, moves well and appears to be learning the forward craft well. Will be an interesting watch in 2025. Date of Birth: January 28, 2002 Height: 195cm Games MFC 2024: 15 Career Total: 18 Goals MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 17 Games CDFC 2024: 1 Goals CDFC 2024:  1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 15

    2024 Player Reviews: #8 Jake Lever

    The Demon’s key defender and backline leader had his share of injuries and niggles throughout the season which prevented him from performing at his peak.  Date of Birth: 5 March 1996 Height: 195cm Games MFC 2024: 18 Career Total: 178 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 5

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 1

    2024 Player Reviews: #13 Clayton Oliver

    Lack of preparation after a problematic preseason prevented Oliver from reaching the high standards set before last year’s hamstring woes. He carried injury right through the back half of the season and was controversially involved in a potential move during the trade period that was ultimately shut down by the club. Date of Birth:  22 July 1997 Height:  189cm Games MFC 2024:  21 Career Total: 183 Goals MFC 2024: 3 Career Total: 54 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 20

    BLOODY BLUES by Meggs

    The conclusion to Narrm’s home and away season was the inevitable let down by the bloody Blues  who meekly capitulated to the Bombers.   The 2024 season fixture handicapped the Demons chances from the get-go with Port Adelaide, Brisbane and Essendon advantaged with enough gimme games to ensure a tough road to the finals, especially after a slew of early season injuries to star players cost wins and percentage.     As we strode confidently through the gates of Prin

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    2024 Player Reviews: #5 Christian Petracca

    Melbourne’s most important player who dominated the first half of the season until his untimely injury in the Kings Birthday clash put an end to his season. At the time, he was on his way to many personal honours and the club in strong finals contention. When the season did end for Melbourne and Petracca was slowly recovering, he was engulfed in controversy about a possible move of clubs amid claims about his treatment by the club in the immediate aftermath of his injury. Date of Birth: 4 J

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 21
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...