Let's Sink the Saints

[pitmaster 3,561]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

And we'd be doing it virutally with a second 22.

Take hold of that idea and we all can go next Sunday and truly barrack for the Dees, knowing the FD won't let it happen anyway. They have been far too professional for that to let it slip now.

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

[MadAsHell 4,212]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

And we'd be doing it virutally with a second 22.

Take hold of that idea and we all can go next Sunday and truly barrack for the Dees, knowing the FD won't let it happen anyway. They have been far too professional for that to let it slip now.

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

I'll take loosing by a point after the siren with the umpire costing us the match with a terrible decision. At least that way the Saints will know they didn't deserve to win, we'd have a nice boost of confidence for next year and picks 1 & 2 to boot!

[pantaloons 2,019]

Or we could lose, take picks 1, 2, 18, 34 and PSD1 into the offseason instead of 1, 17, 33, 49 and PSD1, and allow the only inoffensive premiership option of 2009 to go into the finals with a win! We've come this far in the rebuilding quest, it'd be criminal to ruin it now. It's one more game. We should be able to play our best and still lose anyway, so we can cheer all we like.

[Demon3 2,541]

sad but true i'm afraid.. a win is a no win situation!

[JACKATTACK 17]

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

Yes

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin?

No

I would tear up my membership if we won.

[Carn dees 108]

I'll take loosing by a point after the siren with the umpire costing us the match with a terrible decision. At least that way the Saints will know they didn't deserve to win, we'd have a nice boost of confidence for next year and picks 1 & 2 to boot!

After the richmond game, no thanks.

Lets say loose by 15 and play the beter footy.

[beelzebub 23,379]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

Lets not !!!! <_<

[Roost It 1,434]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

[Jaded No More 68,958]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin?

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to also secure pick 2?

St Kilda will beat us even if we started playing tomorrow. Try as we may, we won't win, and that is a very good thing.

One more week and then until next year we can claim that we are the second biggest winners of 2009 (behind the premiers that is).

[dee-luded 2,959]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

And we'd be doing it virutally with a second 22.

Take hold of that idea and we all can go next Sunday and truly barrack for the Dees, knowing the FD won't let it happen anyway. They have been far too professional for that to let it slip now.

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

Thanks, but, No thanks.

Not interested in 5 seconds of vanity & arrogance.

I want the extra guns, thanks very much.

[praha 11,240]

Sorry OP, but this thread is the pits.

[Sir Why You Little 37,046]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

And we'd be doing it virutally with a second 22.

Take hold of that idea and we all can go next Sunday and truly barrack for the Dees, knowing the FD won't let it happen anyway. They have been far too professional for that to let it slip now.

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

I would rather Pick 2 as that may last for 10+ years thanks. I am sick of answering short sided threads, its tedious.

only one more game of pain until 2010 revival starts.

[Real Demon 232]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin?

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

And after all our hard work lose pick 2.........no thanks!

[Redleg 40,945]

Can't wait for 4.45 PM sunday.

[H_T 3,049]

Sorry OP, but this thread is the pits.

3 votes.

[LITTLE STINGA 1]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

Yeah it helped Essendon.

[Dreamin' Demon 10]

NO

[Carlos Danger 380]

#2 pick > beating St Kilda.

Fact.

[demonmatt 0]

3 years of pain. What's one more week? It would be criminal to win this week. It rips your heart out to say that, but.... that is the reality if the situation.

[Rogue 585]

Pick 2 vs Pick 49 and a win over the Saints - I know which one I want.

Sorry OP, but this thread is the pits.

[#MYHEARTBEATSTRUE 27]

NO

Edited August 24, 2009 by WattsHappening?

[Bruce Almighty 0]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

And we'd be doing it virutally with a second 22.

Take hold of that idea and we all can go next Sunday and truly barrack for the Dees, knowing the FD won't let it happen anyway. They have been far too professional for that to let it slip now.

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

IMO this comment is selfish, you want to put you personal satisfaction for 1 weekend ahead of the future success of the club.

i dont think you understand pick 1 = player that can be as good as judd pick 2 = a player that could be as good as nathan buckley.

[Guest Rojik of the Arctic]

IMO this comment is selfish, you want to put you personal satisfaction for 1 weekend ahead of the future success of the club.

i dont think you understand pick 1 = player that can be as good as judd pick 2 = a player that could be as good as nathan buckley.

Don't want 'em if that is the case. Judd - mercenary who will leave if the offer is right. Buckley - Plays in two GF losses.

Give me someone good.

[Doggo 32]

No thanks. I'll take Scully AND Trengove/Morabito/Rohan, thanks.

[rpfc 28,488]

Wouldn't it be great now that pick one is sewn up to send the Saints into a tailspin? OK we miss a priority, but the morale boost would be sensational and it's always good to derail someone else.

And we'd be doing it virutally with a second 22.

Take hold of that idea and we all can go next Sunday and truly barrack for the Dees, knowing the FD won't let it happen anyway. They have been far too professional for that to let it slip now.

And how about that J McKenzie - a real prospect!

This is one of the most disjointed posts I have ever read. Not indicting you or anything but just walking through this you say...

That you think it would be great to beat the best side in the comp, but then you concede we will have a severely weakened side. You then say we should barrack for that unlikely win, and in the next breath catergorically say that those in charge of the team will not let the win occur...

And then you appluad Jordie McKenzie...

I think 45hotgod16 can give you some sage advice about drunken posting...

45HG16, tell him...