“If we’re clearing that as a football action, we’re going down the wrong path.”

Paul Roos and Ben Cameron were shocked the Henry Smith/Nick Blakey 'inappropriate contact' incident was cleared.

31 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Apparently Blakey was not offended and didn’t lodge any incident.

His plea to the umpire for a free kick for holding the ball went unrewarded.

(* awaits reaction while munching popcorn finger food)

3 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Not required as they already have a digital image of the digital offence.

He is clearly just trying to help him up

Smith not sanctioned for his Hopoate impersonation.... bizarre

So touching the genital/[censored] area of an opponent is not frowned upon by the AFL

That should increase child participation at grassroots

unbelievable

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Apparently Blakey was not offended and didn’t lodge any incident. Ummmm. That raises more questions than answers.

Luckily that wasn't the point

3 hours ago, Demonstone said:

Not required as they already have a digital image of the digital offence.

My sources tell me he is changing his name to Henry Sniff....

What a cop out on the Shiels case

One match suspension for pushing O'Connor into a situation where injury might have been done to O'Connor.

Nothing for endangering Lual !!!!!

44 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

What a cop out on the Shiels case

One match suspension for pushing O'Connor into a situation where injury might have been done to O'Connor.

Nothing for endangering Lual !!!!!

The whole case was dumb and the media rubbish.

If they went back to paying in the back none of this rubbish would happen. Shiel deserves a big penalty or the act but in the end that's not the point here.

It really p...me off.

Just go back to the rules, our forefathers developed them for a reason and this is one of them.

Zero chance that Nick Daicos would be suspended if he did what Shiel did. Zero. Yet again, the AFL proving that they’re a joke.