Jump to content

Featured Replies

Weird part is the Pies play them twice every year and both games are at the MCG. Now I'm happy for the AFL to claim it's a big game so we move it to a big ground but Thursday night was the last two Premiers playing each other. We would have got 80,000 to the game even on the Thursday night. 

 

Compromised draw to meet contracts with the MCG on x amount of games, tv ratings all come first vs integrity of the competition. As mentioned cats play the pies twice ay the G for supposedly more people get to see the game then the cats want a make up game at home and make us play there in a stadium that’s not completed and are ok with less people able to attend to watch the last 2 premiers whilst the mcg was vacant, why isn’t ok for less people to attend to watch cats vs the pies at gmhba but it’s ok if its melb???  You don’t have thus happening in the EPL or any other National comps globally! What is so hard for the afl to have a draw with one season home & the next away???


How is there any integrity in the AFL when they develop a fixture doing individual deals to appease individual clubs then give scraps to smaller clubs

Our Club needs to stop selling home games & possible 4 points as once again our draw will see us play away for 3 weeks in a row with Gmhba, NT, Marvel, I’m sure Pert is a strong negotiator but about time our club started getting more than just scraps 

Edited by Demonsone

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

 

Fitzroy have played more games than Collingwood !!

WTF?

Of those 25, how many did we win? Im guessing 3.

Edited by Wadda We Sing

 

OK, we can all understand that the AFL is driven by $$ rather than a fair competition and that's why some teams never play at that stadium (which is more suited for chariot racing than footy), but if they had any integrity they'd give the clubs forced to play down there some compensation (other than cash). Eg, every (excessive) time you play down there you get moved up the draft order by 1 pick or somesuch.

42 minutes ago, sue said:

OK, we can all understand that the AFL is driven by $$ rather than a fair competition and that's why some teams never play at that stadium (which is more suited for chariot racing than footy), but if they had any integrity they'd give the clubs forced to play down there some compensation (other than cash). Eg, every (excessive) time you play down there you get moved up the draft order by 1 pick or somesuch.

The reality can’t play each other twice so very simple one season you play home &  the next away.. Cats have every right to play home games even host finals with new increased capacity. 


This cwood has more support argument is ambiguous.

Kardinia park only holds a certain number of opposing fans.

The fact is Dees fans miss out in attending as well. 

It's politics if we want the truth.

cwood is a very politically savvy club.

Crowd size is irrelevant at the Cattery more important is MCG crowd  Cats v  Pies  70K or thereabouts.  Pert should definitiely lobby the Afl. Lowly Hawthorn never go down there its absurd. Saints and Eagles got a reprieve this year.

9 hours ago, Deebauched said:

Crowd size is irrelevant at the Cattery more important is MCG crowd  Cats v  Pies  70K or thereabouts.  Pert should definitiely lobby the Afl. Lowly Hawthorn never go down there its absurd. Saints and Eagles got a reprieve this year.

So the Afl are running a comp based on negotiated deals with individual clubs, what a joke 

Edited by Demonsone

 

For those saying Pert should lobby the AFL, first you need to lobby Pert. Email him and tell him. The club works with us. If we make a cohesive argument then it helps him go to the AFL.

13 hours ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Fitzroy have played more games than Collingwood !!

WTF?

Of those 25, how many did we win? Im guessing 3.

Probably about 3 but the one in 2021 was the best. Great win from behind and minor premiers after the siren!! What a joy that was and of course, what was to follow.


Aren't we a team of, play anywhere, anytime. It is a good creed, and I like it.

The Kitty's will fall off their egotistical pedestal and some day the skills will decline, then we'll even up those win/loss stats. They may already be in decline.

Eventually Geelong will get finals at their oval and we will be better on the night/day for that experience. 

I prefer the GMBHA as away games than interstate ones, mainly because the players don't have to travel very far. Though, hanging out at Torque the night before didn't seem to work. Through trying things, we will find the best approach, which some other teams don't get a chance to explore.

 

Edited by kev martin

22 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

So that's actually 26 now i take it 

7 hours ago, Bobby McKenzie said:

Probably about 3 but the one in 2021 was the best. Great win from behind and minor premiers after the siren!! What a joy that was and of course, what was to follow.

And, Bobby, no coincidence that there was no feral crowd that night to intimidate the umpires.  Though, of course, we’re we’re clearly the best team of the year. 

There is another possible reason why Collingwood doesn't play in Geelong. We all know the State government has been happy to fund the redevelopment of the stadium because it is in an area with a few marginal electorates. But has the government adequately funded the Police? With insufficient police numbers in Geelong,  hosting a Collingwood game with its supporters is a much higher community risk than having the safer Melbourne supporters in town.   


Why do you ask Cricket, this how it has always been.!!!! Goes way back to 1859.!!

Edited by DeeZone

Let’s get a petition going from Demonland - Demons only have to play at Kitty Park every 2nd year!

On 6/25/2023 at 11:28 AM, Wadda We Sing said:

Fitzroy have played more games than Collingwood !!

WTF?

Of those 25, how many did we win? Im guessing 3.

We one that counted in 21

It would be nice to get a nice win down there in front of all their fans in this window. 

  • Demonland changed the title to Collingwood at Kardinia Park
On 6/26/2023 at 12:33 AM, The heart beats true said:

For those saying Pert should lobby the AFL, first you need to lobby Pert. Email him and tell him. The club works with us. If we make a cohesive argument then it helps him go to the AFL.

Just sent him my email it's been a pet peeve of mine for quite some time.


The AFL should have forced them to expand the wings to within a 2-3 m of the MCG specs. Even if that meant taking a few rows out from the stands on both wings or demolish the stand alongside Moorabool street.

The fact that they are allowed to maintain that advantage to 9, soon to be 11 home games is ridiculous. I think most teams will struggle at this venue - even the Pies and Port who rely on corridor space to transition. Geelong just [censored] it down and force you wide and slow. 

2 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

The AFL should have forced them to expand the wings to within a 2-3 m of the MCG specs. Even if that meant taking a few rows out from the stands on both wings or demolish the stand alongside Moorabool street.

The fact that they are allowed to maintain that advantage to 9, soon to be 11 home games is ridiculous. I think most teams will struggle at this venue - even the Pies and Port who rely on corridor space to transition. Geelong just [censored] it down and force you wide and slow. 

The worst part following your comment, accurate as it is.,  as follows

The fact that the Cats train on an $8.0m MCC sized oval at Deakin Uni in Waurn Ponds Geelong in prep for finals is the real scanadl here. taxppayer funded and deakin don't have a local footy team.  As posted by another Poster on Demenland recently.

Did the Cats pay for that ?>  - who would know?

 

38 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

The AFL should have forced them to expand the wings to within a 2-3 m of the MCG specs. Even if that meant taking a few rows out from the stands on both wings or demolish the stand alongside Moorabool street.

The fact that they are allowed to maintain that advantage to 9, soon to be 11 home games is ridiculous. I think most teams will struggle at this venue - even the Pies and Port who rely on corridor space to transition. Geelong just [censored] it down and force you wide and slow. 

Easy enough to build out over the road. 

There's just no excuse. 

 
Just now, beelzebub said:

Easy enough to build out over the road. 

There's just no excuse. 

Just wait until the year that the Pies have to play there and lose. Then it’ll be front page news with all shows talking about it. 

4 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Just wait until the year that the Pies have to play there and lose. Then it’ll be front page news with all shows talking about it. 

But I doubt my body will hold up for another 200 years.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 155 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 31 replies