Jump to content

MCL Injury to Max Gawn

Colm
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

I noticed doctor Laura sat next to him all night and was talking a lot. I think she was in counseling mode. Trying to support him best she could. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Sad 3
     
    1 minute ago, Slartibartfast said:

    Oh Jaded, settle down until we know. 

    Jaded No More is definitely Jaded Again

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Clap 1
    • Author

    Assume we won’t know anything until lunch time. Going to be a long morning

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    7 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Yeah agreed. I Kind of got the impression he knew something.

    I’m afraid you might be right and I oh so hope that I am wrong with my thinking.

    If it is the worst case scenario I hope Max draws on the fighting spirit of Jim Stynes, does his time recuperating and comes back bigger and stronger than ever next year.

    Opportunity for Schache to step up alongside Grundy?

    As I said earlier…… I hope I am so wrong about Max 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Given his height and age, if it's a medical we're probably looking at 8-12 weeks. If an ACL we all know how long.

    Either way, we're going to have to figure out how to play without him for a while, so let's talk about that. Do they pull the trigger on Schache? I thought Tom's ruckwork was very poor and directly cost us quite a few goals. 

    Brodie will get better but he's a different player to Max and is not going to give us the contested marking presence we need. Not sure Schache takes a strong contested mark either. 

    Max is irreplaceable but we will need to do something. Is KFW too raw? He seems further progressed than Verrall. 

    I think Schache will come in for Gawn and they'll try to persist with Tom up forward until he either finds form or JVR kicks him out. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    2 minutes ago, Wodjathefirst said:

    I’m afraid you might be right and I oh so hope that I am wrong with my thinking.

    If it is the worst case scenario I hope Max draws on the fighting spirit of Jim Stynes, does his time recuperating and comes back bigger and stronger than ever next year.

    Opportunity for Schache to step up alongside Grundy?

    As I said earlier…… I hope I am so wrong about Max 

    Grateful the list  build is in the hands of people like Taylor and Lamb in these occasions, recognising our achilles heel (one of them) in ruck stocks.  Now with Schache we can at least have a form of solution.

    Heartfelt thoughts to Max at this time .  A wonderful leader.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    I think we had all better get used to the idea of Goody holding up the Premiership Cup with Jack Viney this year.

  • Quote
    • Like 10
    • Clap 2

    Hopefully not an ACL but either way he's out for a while.

    Huge loss to the team but we have a handy replacement in Grundy. Thought he worked his way into the game well last night.

    We just got to suck this up and get on with it. We're still a very good team and can overcome this. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
     
    2 minutes ago, BDA said:

    Hopefully not an ACL but either way he's out for a while.

    Huge loss to the team but we have a handy replacement in Grundy. Thought he worked his way into the game well last night.

    We just got to suck this up and get on with it. We're still a very good team and can overcome this. 

    My concern with losing Max isn’t around the ruck itself. Our midfield will adjust to playing under Grundy who is no slouch, just like they adjusted to play with Jackson. 

    Gawn is so vital to our down the ground structure and takes contested marks. We have nobody who can replicate that and it does absolutely stuff up an entire pre- season of planning around two key ruckmen with Gawn playing deep forward.

    It isn’t something you can just fine tune in a week of training. We don’t have anyone who can replace Gawn’s work around the ground, and Grundy having missed a year of footy is just not going to be able to shoulder his enormous work rate either. 
     

    We need to very very quickly make some structural changes if we want to keep our flag chances going. It also doesn’t help that TMac seems to be cooked. 

  • Quote
    • Like 6

    Agree doesn’t look good but we can’t toss the whole year in….I can think of 3 clubs off the top of my head who won flags when they lost a vital player for the year with an ACL (Port 2004, Bulldogs 2016, Tigers 2019)

     

    Let’s hope for the best though

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1

    2 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

    My concern with losing Max isn’t around the ruck itself. Our midfield will adjust to playing under Grundy who is no slouch, just like they adjusted to play with Jackson. 

    Gawn is so vital to our down the ground structure and takes contested marks. We have nobody who can replicate that and it does absolutely stuff up an entire pre- season of planning around two key ruckmen with Gawn playing deep forward.

    It isn’t something you can just fine tune in a week of training. We don’t have anyone who can replace Gawn’s work around the ground, and Grundy having missed a year of footy is just not going to be able to shoulder his enormous work rate either. 
     

    We need to very very quickly make some structural changes if we want to keep our flag chances going. It also doesn’t help that TMac seems to be cooked. 

    I don't disagree with any of that Jaded. And TMac is a big worry for sure.

    But injuries to key players happen all the time. It's a big inditement of the brains trust if plan B's are not in place for these eventualities. 

    If the worst comes to the worst I believe we have the cattle to secure top 4. Other players need to step up leadership wise and the brains trust need to figure it out structurally. Its what they are paid to do.

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    • Love 1
    18 minutes ago, sisso said:

    Agree doesn’t look good but we can’t toss the whole year in….I can think of 3 clubs off the top of my head who won flags when they lost a vital player for the year with an ACL (Port 2004, Bulldogs 2016, Tigers 2019)

     

    Let’s hope for the best though

    Great call...

    Primus, murphy and rance?

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Love 1

    42 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

    My concern with losing Max isn’t around the ruck itself. Our midfield will adjust to playing under Grundy who is no slouch, just like they adjusted to play with Jackson. 

    Gawn is so vital to our down the ground structure and takes contested marks. We have nobody who can replicate that and it does absolutely stuff up an entire pre- season of planning around two key ruckmen with Gawn playing deep forward.

    It isn’t something you can just fine tune in a week of training. We don’t have anyone who can replace Gawn’s work around the ground, and Grundy having missed a year of footy is just not going to be able to shoulder his enormous work rate either. 
     

    We need to very very quickly make some structural changes if we want to keep our flag chances going. It also doesn’t help that TMac seems to be cooked. 

    Very fair point. Any changes are going to take weeks to take effect. The challenge is laid down though and our premiership coaches will have to earn their bucks.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 hour ago, fr_ap said:

    Given his height and age, if it's a medical we're probably looking at 8-12 weeks. If an ACL we all know how long.

    Either way, we're going to have to figure out how to play without him for a while, so let's talk about that. Do they pull the trigger on Schache? I thought Tom's ruckwork was very poor and directly cost us quite a few goals. 

    Brodie will get better but he's a different player to Max and is not going to give us the contested marking presence we need. Not sure Schache takes a strong contested mark either. 

    Max is irreplaceable but we will need to do something. Is KFW too raw? He seems further progressed than Verrall. 

    I think Schache will come in for Gawn and they'll try to persist with Tom up forward until he either finds form or JVR kicks him out. 

    I agree ... rather than have to swing things around too much Schache for Gawn makes more sense.  Ruck forward with some time in the middle with Grundy in the middle (and back) to help out

    But I can't say I know a lot about Schache as a ruck/forward but others here could enlighten

    We don't want to burden Grundy with too much to do week in week out.  

    Anyway, if Schache plays that allows us to use T-Mac in a fashion where he can work up the ground leaving space for a non double-teamed Brown to lead into.  Worked in round 1

    But again, I'm not sure that Schache can do well enough to play the role we might need him for.  Worth a try though as Grundy can't do it all on his own and T-Mac's rucking is questionable (not effective)

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    The worry for me is he has already had 2 major knee injuries earlier in his career. I was 30 metres away at the Casey ground when he did his 2nd one right in front of me. The history of people with 3 major knee injuries is not good, and at Max's age recovery is longer. 

    Here's hoping a mild strain of something, and its 6-8 weeks maximum.

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    Let me throw a conspiracy theory out there. P.s. physio here.

    To me the communication was weird From Goody and Alan Richardson. 

    Melbourne and Gawn MAY be considering an no-op management of his ACL (if ACL is suspected). 

    In that case, they would definitely be murky with the results. Bulldogs did this and lied about Giansiracusa and his ACL. They went with a no-op management. The only reason for the consideration would be Gawn's age and premiership window.

    Whilst the Lachman's test was negative (95% accuracy), nothing was mentioned about an anterior draw. An anterior draw is an alternate test for an ACL, however it's less reliable. 

    A clinical guess can only assume its VERY unlikely he has done his ACL. Technically, Max is a 5% chance of an ACL. Enjoy your Saturday. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 4
    • Love 6
    6 minutes ago, RyanD said:

    Let me throw a conspiracy theory out there. P.s. physio here.

    To me the communication was weird From Goody and Alan Richardson. 

    Melbourne and Gawn MAY be considering an no-op management of his ACL (if ACL is suspected). 

    In that case, they would definitely be murky with the results. Bulldogs did this and lied about Giansiracusa and his ACL. They went with a no-op management. The only reason for the consideration would be Gawn's age and premiership window.

    Whilst the Lachman's test was negative (95% accuracy), nothing was mentioned about an anterior draw. An anterior draw is an alternate test for an ACL, however it's less reliable. 

    A clinical guess can only assume its VERY unlikely he has done his ACL. Technically, Max is a 5% chance of an ACL. Enjoy your Saturday. 

    Feeling better already. 

  • Quote
    • Haha 1

    I was out last night and missed the game until the last 5 minutes (luckily)

    cane on here to find out about Max - is it a confirmed ACL and he’s out for a year, or is it just rampant MFCSS atm?

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Demon17 said:

    Grateful the list  build is in the hands of people like Taylor and Lamb in these occasions, recognising our achilles heel (one of them) in ruck stocks.  Now with Schache we can at least have a form of solution.

    Heartfelt thoughts to Max at this time .  A wonderful leader.

     

    Schache would be behind TMac as a ruck option.

  • Quote
    •  
    6 minutes ago, RyanD said:

    Let me throw a conspiracy theory out there. P.s. physio here.

    To me the communication was weird From Goody and Alan Richardson. 

    Melbourne and Gawn MAY be considering an no-op management of his ACL (if ACL is suspected). 

    In that case, they would definitely be murky with the results. Bulldogs did this and lied about Giansiracusa and his ACL. They went with a no-op management. The only reason for the consideration would be Gawn's age and premiership window.

    Whilst the Lachman's test was negative (95% accuracy), nothing was mentioned about an anterior draw. An anterior draw is an alternate test for an ACL, however it's less reliable. 

    A clinical guess can only assume its VERY unlikely he has done his ACL. Technically, Max is a 5% chance of an ACL. Enjoy your Saturday. 

    Can I ask how you know the test you mentioned was negative? 


    Also what does it look like for a 31 year old giant with 2 previous recos to not undergo a surgical ACL repair? 
    What is the alternative?

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    Just now, rpfc said:

    Schache would be behind TMac as a ruck option.

    I think Tmac’s busted foot disagrees. 
    He looks cooked. He says himself he’s playing with pain and needing management. Rucking is literally the last thing I think his body can handle. 

  • Quote
    • Like 9
    • Thanks 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Thanks
      • 23 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 232 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All