Jump to content

Patrick Cripps FREE to play

spirit of norm smith
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Before remembering they are playing Collingwood in Rd 23 I would have said throw the book at him.

Edited by layzie

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
     
    59 minutes ago, layzie said:

    Hopefully this gets binned

    I'll see what I can do.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 6
     
    32 minutes ago, TheWiz said:

    Question: if Cripps’ suspension gets extended and Carlton gets knocked out of the H&A season, as the extension will roll into next year would he be ineligible for next year’s Brownlow?

    No

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    45 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

    Pretty sure a suspended player is only ineligible for the season in which the offence occurs.

     

     

    Thank you

  • Quote

    57 minutes ago, layzie said:

    It's a good question, I'd say it should. Unless they factor in the stupid pre season games.

    Am pretty sure suspension only counts for H+A, after some shenanigans in finals 20 years ago.

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
    • Angry 1
    7 minutes ago, DEE fence said:

    Am pretty sure suspension only counts for H+A, after some shenanigans in finals 20 years ago.

    That makes sense.

  • Quote

    What's the penalty / cost for appealing tribunal verdicts? If there is no deterrent (eg extra week penalty), I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often.

  • Quote
    •  

    Hope he plays and we [censored] them all the same

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Love 1

    Wasting briefs time going there if they are just going to pick and choose who they want off.

  • Quote

    I just watched the hit for the first time, over which Leigh Matthews was on commentary saying - “I suspect that was incidental contact”. Wowee! Thugs never die I guess. Incidental of course to the fact he wanted to maim Ah Chee without having to look at the ball or make any attempt to take possession of it. 

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    1 hour ago, poita said:

    What's the penalty / cost for appealing tribunal verdicts? If there is no deterrent (eg extra week penalty), I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often.

    No extra penalty, but a $5000 cost for the appeal.

  • Quote

    What are the rules in the case of an appeal?

    Don't they have to claim they have new evidence that wasn't already considered by the original tribunal?

  • Quote

    6 minutes ago, Elwood 3184 said:

    What are the rules in the case of an appeal?

    Don't they have to claim they have new evidence that wasn't already considered by the original tribunal?

    It's another really good question that no-one ever seems to have an answer for. I always thought they just get the lawyers involved and try to get off on technicalities but I'd really know diddly. 

  • Quote
    On 8/9/2022 at 8:32 PM, Dee-monic said:

    The grounds for an appeal against a tribunal decision are extremely limited. A player can appeal on one or more of the following grounds:

     An error of law has occurred;

    The decision is so unreasonable that no tribunal acting reasonably could have come to that decision having regard to the evidence before it;

    The classification of the offence by the tribunal was manifestly excessive or inadequate;

    The sanction imposed by the tribunal was manifestly excessive or inadequate.

    Can't see how any of those would stand a chance of success.

    If this act had been done by a fringe player, I doubt if it would even have got as far as the tribunal.

    Re-posting this (nice work Dee-monic) to answer the questions raised above. 

  • Quote

    Wasn't it a Brownlow Medalist too, and they found he had an extra finger that got in the way. 

  • Quote
    32 minutes ago, mauriesy said:

    No extra penalty, but a $5000 cost for the appeal.

    So will that extra 5000 bucks cost them from recruiting another GWS player at the end of the season.

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    46 minutes ago, mauriesy said:

    No extra penalty, but a $5000 cost for the appeal.

    ABC this morning reported its  a $5000 fine and an additonal week suspension, taking it to 3 weeks.

    Thus missing first final if they make it.  Hence the "...huge gamble..."  they are taking.

    Silly strategy IMO

  • Quote
    • Haha 1

    Phil Carman got a 2 weeks suspension missed the 1977 GF which was a draw and missed the replay as well!!  ....if my memory serves me correctly.

    Collingwood would have (rightly) tried to get the 2nd game rolled over to 1978 R1 but  no joy.

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, layzie said:

    Such a waste of the court's time. 

    It's not a Court. It's an AFL appointed Board.

  • Quote
    •  
    11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    It's not a Court. It's an AFL appointed Board.

    I know Mr Leg, just having a lend of this 'appointed board' 

  • Quote

    How’s the latest throw at the stumps going?

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Carlton

      I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Carlton

      The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: St. Kilda

      The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • 104 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Carlton

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • 28 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Carlton

      Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 22 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Carlton

      A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 304 replies
      Demonland
    View All