Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Melksham made the most of his opportunities and should stay in the team.

IN: Lever, Brown and Hunt

OUT: Tomlinson, Harmes & Spargo

Edited by Jibroni

1 minute ago, drysdale demon said:

I did post back in 2018 that reading this site was like being trapped on public transport with a pack of schoolgirls, it hasn't changed.

Are you still on the ‘still loading’ side of the argument. Or are you aware we are out of form and sliding? 

 

Can we drop Jackson so we don't let him go to his home state and see what he's missing?

I have no idea. Find a player who can mark, kick goals or not butcher the ball.

8 minutes ago, brendan said:

Here is a fun fact we can still finish 9th 

Or 1st.


8 minutes ago, SPC said:

Are you still on the ‘still loading’ side of the argument. Or are you aware we are out of form and sliding? 

one side wins the other side loses that is what happens in sport.

11 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

Melksham made the most of his opportunities and should stay in the team.

He delivered well a couple of times, kicked a couple of goals but also had 0 tackles, so probably stays in but no guarantee IMO.

 

 
Just now, illbarto said:

My kingdom for a Tom MacDonald

Hop on board the Free Roo campaign

7 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

one side wins the other side loses that is what happens in sport.

No, one side that should win loses.. the other side wins. It’s our job as supporters of the side who should win to critique. We are just providing our view not hurting anyone Denise.


I give up with selection this year.

In saying i think we'll go in as unchanged.

In: Lever, B.Brown, Chandler .

OUT: Tomlinson, Spargo, Bedford 

1 minute ago, SPC said:

No, one side that should win loses.. the other side wins. It’s our job as supporters of the side who should win to critique. We are just providing our view not hurting anyone Denise.

NO, you are just carrying on like a little kid, go to bed.

Just now, drysdale demon said:

NO, you are just carrying on like a little kid, go to bed.

Happy for some actual construction discussion, other than just some petty spat. We are all Dees fans, some use the forum to analyse, vent, or just look to fight. I know where you sit. 


1 minute ago, SPC said:

Happy for some actual construction discussion, other than just some petty spat. We are all Dees fans, some use the forum to analyse, vent, or just look to fight. I know where you sit. 

You just bag the the players and club continuously.

7 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

I give up with selection this year.

In saying i think we'll go in as unchanged.

No we won't

 

Edited by drysdale demon
less information.

1 minute ago, drysdale demon said:

No we won't

 

It's sarcasm. 

49 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Salem needs to address his role in the team. Whatever it is at present isn't working

Tempted to throw Salem to Wing/Forward, bring Bowie into defence for skills

Jordan a rest with the knee

Lever in, Thomo to Sub


38 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

I did post back in 2018 that reading this site was like being trapped on public transport with a pack of schoolgirls, it hasn't changed.

Everyone angry emotional after loss cause we care. 

Out the coach, has no idea, you can throw the team around a bit, the man is a liability.

 
Just now, drysdale demon said:

okay, if that is what you reckon.

Well yes? That's exactly what it is?

Of course we're clearly not going to go unchanged when we have Lever to come back in 🤦‍♂️


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 87 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 317 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies