Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, Demon Dynasty said:

Suspension!???

Surely a fine and/or community service or whatever would suffice.

More than likely just handed the match to the Pies and possibly a top four spot if it gets tight at the top from here.

Crazy decision IMV that, as you say Macca, punishes the team more than the player.

The filth will all be jumping for joy as we type.  Expect less Demons to turn up also given it hampers our chances of winning.  You know how fickle our lot are (bar most of the rusted on minions here). 

A heavier fine ($10k - $15k) would have fixed things but a $5k maximum fine (PA CBA agreement) almost forces those imparting the punishment to go heavier ... which ends up being a suspension

Community service is also part of it but is that strictly adhered to? 

We are in the business of trying to win the only prize on offer (the Premiership) and every Home & Away win increases your chances of winning the big one ... and any loss lessens the chances

You do not want to be playing a prelim final against Brisbane, Fremantle or Sydney as the away team

And you don't get many chances at the top as us supporters know full well ... we are in our window and the time to win big is right now

May had to cop a sanction for breaking protocols but suspended? Not for mine

As for the actual fight, it doesn't look like he threw the first punch and in that situation you might feel inclined to fight back for fear of more fists coming your way.  Jake might have wanted to go in for a bit more.  Who knows in that sort of chaos?

But we don't know the full story so my opinion is just that, an opinion

I wouldn't have suspended him on what we currently know to be true (breaking concussion protocols)

 
5 minutes ago, Spaghetti said:

What the [censored] happened to this club all of a sudden.

It's not the losses. Something has been off for over a month.

Because the crowds have been so poor at our games, the club assumed everyone was bored with our 10-0 start, and strong culture. 

so the last couple of weeks has been a plan from the marketing/PR departments to see if we can get 80k to the game on Mon 

 

3 minutes ago, DemonWA said:

I've heard plenty of banter that goes below the belt. There is never an excuse to get violent though. Can't believe May is the bad guy here

IMO it is because he is a good player who we miss, milkshake is no longer a senior player and won’t be missed. 

 
8 minutes ago, DemonWA said:

I've heard plenty of banter that goes below the belt. There is never an excuse to get violent though. Can't believe May is the bad guy here

Not to mention punching a guy recovering from a concussion...

I can't believe it was kept a secret until today. In the world of phones and social media I can't believe footage hasn't surfaced. But I bet the likes of Tom Browne are hunting for footage. 


I believe that this situation is inexcusable having teammates squabbling and striking each other in public when we are on the second biggest mission in their lives to date. Particularly two senior players who should have more sense, having said that I thought that Steven Mays apology and acceptance of the one week ban was made with humility and acceptance that it was a serious disruption to the team, Stevens has promised to workharder to help the team over the next 10 - 12 weeks. He knows he has let his teammates and us supporters down. Let’s judge his response over the remainder of the year.!!

I wonder what Goodwin first thought when he was told about this. 

I bet Roffey just wants to hang there heads together and say you idiots grow up.

Gee to think back a few years ago when roosy was in charge & the biggest problem he had was when trac hurt his knee playing basketball when he was recovering from his knee injury.

Apparently max is speaking tomorrow. He'd feel letdown. He always said may was the player we could least afford to lose

 

Edited by dees189227

D'landers thinking of QB before and after the boozy bash up news....

Fail Miami Dolphins GIF

 
4 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

I wonder what Goodwin first thought when he was told about this. 

I bet Roffey just wants to hang there heads together and say you idiots grow up.

Gee to think back a few years ago when roosy was in charge & the biggest problem he had was when trac hurt his knee playing basketball when he was recovering from his knee injury.

Apparently max is speaking tomorrow. 

 

Do you know which platform?

29 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

I can't believe it was kept a secret until today. In the world of phones and social media I can't believe footage hasn't surfaced. But I bet the likes of Tom Browne are hunting for footage. 

IMO it's only a matter of time until footage leaks. I would be shocked if there isn't footage from someone


Sounds like it might have been more than one punch, according to the restaurant. No doubt there will be some vision and more detail coming out when the press dig deeper into their pockets.

If May said what has been reported, it was cheap and about as low as you can go with a team mate. That he was drinking when he should not have been speaks volumes.

However, posters saying a punch by Melk was justified should spend a Sat night in a hospital ER. A single punch can kill. A punch delivered by a once talented amo boxer with a few drinks under his belt even more so. Not to mention May's concussion

Its dumb all round

Edited by Stiff Arm

5 minutes ago, Stiff Arm said:

Sounds like it might have been more than one punch, according to the restaurant. No doubt there will be some vision and more detail coming out when the press dig deeper into their pockets.

If May said what has been reported, it was cheap and about as low as you can go with a team mate. That he was drinking when he should not have been speaks volumes.

However, posters saying a punch by Melk was justified should spend a Sat night in a hospital ER. A single punch can kill. A punch delivered by a once talented amo boxer with a few drinks under his belt even more so. Not to mention May's concussion

Its dumb all round

Just reading Melksham threw a punch shuddered me. I mean I don't want to be dramatic but what if he hit may in the wrong spot or may fell & hit his head? Anyway lets hope we don't have to read about these incidents again

I heard that May told Melksham that if he had played in the GF we wouldn’t have won and that started the fight.

The most disappointing part about all this is how far removed their behavior is from the culture we have worked so hard to build from top to bottom. 
Inexcusable garbage from two guys who are old enough to know better. 

3 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

The most disappointing part about all this is how far removed their behavior is from the culture we have worked so hard to build from top to bottom. 
Inexcusable garbage from two guys who are old enough to know better. 

Being able to play football well it does not necessarily make you a rocket scientist.


1 hour ago, Demonland said:

 

So now Entrecote think they have a steak in this fight huh?

I don't find the comment by May that bad. We won by 74 points so it's clearly illogical and I would find it hard to take offense (trying to put myself in Melk's place). If May had said - you were too sht of a player to get a game in the granny - that would sting as it is true

I wonder what Melksham's last barb to May was.

Either way, Melksham had zero justification to punch him

24 minutes ago, John Crow Batty said:

I heard that May told Melksham that if he had played in the GF we wouldn’t have won and that started the fight.

Yeah that's the latest report.  Was it just taking the [censored] out of his mate sledge or had a bit more malice in it?  Either way May is a good judge of football ability in terms of success :)

Missing must really burn in Melksham which is fair enough, but what has be shown in his games this year to keep his spot.  From what I can see on TV telecast, he still doesn't do the hard work required by the team.  

  

1 minute ago, Darkhorse72 said:

Yeah that's the latest report.  Was it just taking the [censored] out of his mate sledge or had a bit more malice in it?  Either way May is a good judge of football ability in terms of success :)

Missing must really burn in Melksham which is fair enough, but what has be shown in his games this year to keep his spot.  From what I can see on TV telecast, he still doesn't do the hard work required by the team.  

  

It’s all irrelevant. Melksham is his teammate. You don’t burn your teammate like that. It’s disrespectful and such a poor way to lead as a senior player. 
Likewise you don’t punch on or resort to violence. Ever. 
I can’t see how this occurred if both of them were stone cold sober either. 
 


Jon Ralph actually wrote a pretty decent article bringing all the bits together from the week - form, injuries, Bartlett texts, Melksham v May etc - and he finished with this:

So here is the message for Melbourne: sharpen up and get it together.

Good clubs smarten up and strip away the distractions.

Clubs who cannot do that spend the next decade like Collingwood, wondering whether the Mick Malthouse succession dramas of 2011 had enough of an impact to derail them.

In 2015 Hawthorn captain Luke Hodge blew .068 in a drink-drive controversy and six weeks later the Hawks were premiers.

In 2007 Steve Johnson didn’t play AFL until round 7 given a club-imposed ban and 20 games later was the Norm Smith Medallist in a Grand Final victory.

In 2020 Richmond looked to self-immolating in a hub amid fallout between Trent Cotchin and the senior hierarchy as kebab-shop punch-ons were the order of the day.

Months later Richmond won a third premiership in four seasons.

Distractions don’t have to define football clubs.

They can be valuable lessons that recalibrate a player or a team or club.

Melbourne is still the most talented team in football, but it is far from invincible.

There’s no better stage than Queens Birthday, against a white-hot Collingwood side and without their All Australian defensive star in May, to start that march back to respectability.

 

I know this will not go away for a while but I will put my coaches hat on and say it happened, sometimes poop happens, can't change that. Now let's get on with the season starting Monday with a convincing win against the Pies and all will be good for the rest of the season.

 
21 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Jon Ralph actually wrote a pretty decent article bringing all the bits together from the week - form, injuries, Bartlett texts, Melksham v May etc - and he finished with this:

So here is the message for Melbourne: sharpen up and get it together.

Good clubs smarten up and strip away the distractions.

Clubs who cannot do that spend the next decade like Collingwood, wondering whether the Mick Malthouse succession dramas of 2011 had enough of an impact to derail them.

In 2015 Hawthorn captain Luke Hodge blew .068 in a drink-drive controversy and six weeks later the Hawks were premiers.

In 2007 Steve Johnson didn’t play AFL until round 7 given a club-imposed ban and 20 games later was the Norm Smith Medallist in a Grand Final victory.

In 2020 Richmond looked to self-immolating in a hub amid fallout between Trent Cotchin and the senior hierarchy as kebab-shop punch-ons were the order of the day.

Months later Richmond won a third premiership in four seasons.

Distractions don’t have to define football clubs.

They can be valuable lessons that recalibrate a player or a team or club.

Melbourne is still the most talented team in football, but it is far from invincible.

There’s no better stage than Queens Birthday, against a white-hot Collingwood side and without their All Australian defensive star in May, to start that march back to respectability.

 

That’s strangely good journalism from Ralphy - wonder how our old mate Morris would have run with this. 

Edited by CYB

1 hour ago, DemonWA said:

I've heard plenty of banter that goes below the belt. There is never an excuse to get violent though. Can't believe May is the bad guy here

Not defending Melksham. I’m explaining why that is more than ‘banter’ and why it wouldn’t be tolerated in our culture.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies