Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, DEE fence said:

Minor correction,  I don't think any team is top 8 material after they play us.

20220423_094540.png

I like the title of their Post-Match thread.

Canny Crows take a giant dump on dopey dogs from up high. 63-62.

 
1 hour ago, Chook said:

Nick Riewoldt (who of course has gone through just this) seemed to think self-preservation kicks in at a certain point - like "I don't want to be hurt like that again" so you don't work quite as hard, commit quite as much, and so on.

Ahhh right. And if that only happens to 3-4 good players on your list, that’s probably enough to see a drop off.

1 hour ago, Demon Disciple said:

Make it a multi with May perpetually kicking out to the left HBF. Nothing surer in life

What would be offered on the following 24 leg multi?

  1. Dogs loosing the free lick count,
  2. May kicking to the right,
  3. Daniher kicking a goal from 15 metres in front,
  4. Malthouse behaving like a top bloke,
  5. Dermott stringing together three sentences culminating in a comprehendible paragraph,
  6. The AFL admitting its ticketing regime is shiiiiite,
  7. Selwood not getting a free kicking for ducking next week,
  8. Viney squibbing the hard ball,
  9. Any AFL footballer not saying at the end of game interview, "we knew they'd come out hard",
  10. Eddie saying "we are racist at Colinwood",
  11. Brock saying, "I was only pulling your leg",
  12. Neeld saying, "I got it wrong",
  13. Toby saying "Matt and I are as tight as a Russian bodybuilder's quads",
  14. Any AFL footballer not answering a question in the next week beginning with 'yeah/nah',
  15. Gary Rohan being best on ground in a final,
  16. Goodwin saying "it was an error of judgement to trade with Norf for Jackson and Pickett",
  17. Fyfe, Bailey Smith and Natanui getting proper haircuts,
  18. Papley buying some shorts that actually fit,
  19. Razor Ray not imposing himself on a game in 2022,
  20. Gryan Miers changing his name by deed poll,
  21. Mitch McGovern saying "here's a $500,000 refund",
  22. Tom Hawkins pipped at the post for the 2023 Oscar for Best Actor,
  23. The AFL saying, "we got it wrong with the Giants and GCS", and finally,
  24. The Deez are no chance in 2002.

Edited by Queanbeyan Demon
Typo

 
5 minutes ago, BoBo said:

Ahhh right. And if that only happens to 3-4 good players on your list, that’s probably enough to see a drop off.

Port Adelaide showed it all over the ground in last year’s Preliminary Final. 
None of them wanted a hard ball

1 hour ago, BDA said:

I love seeing West Coast getting belted. High on my wish list is to see the Dees smash them by 100 points. At Optus

I really enjoyed being at Subi for this game Round 22, 2000

 

West Coast  5.1   8.3  10.6 15.10 100

Melbourne  4.4  13.5  19.9 26.14 170


32 minutes ago, Macca said:

For instance, as you and most others know, the handpass used to require a clenched fist punching the ball from another hand/arm that was stationary

Not stationary. Nowhere in the rules does it say "stationary", nor has it ever.

Regardless, why are blatant throws that are throws in anyone's language not called?

 

32 minutes ago, Macca said:

And it's gone way past blaming the umps ... this is a rules of the game issue which is an AFL issue

If only there was some branch or arm of the AFL that was responsible for enforcing the rules in the AFL comp. Perhaps we could encourage them to look into these matters.

8 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

What would be offered on the following 24 leg multi?

  1. Dogs loosing the free lick count,
  2. May kicking to the right,
  3. Daniher kicking a goal from 15 metres in front,
  4. Malthouse behaving like a top bloke,
  5. Dermott stringing together three sentences culminating in a comprehendible paragraph,
  6. The AFL admitting its ticketing regime is shiiiiite,
  7. Selwood not getting a free kicking for ducking next week,
  8. Viney squibbing the hard ball,
  9. Any AFL footballer not saying at the end of game interview, "we knew they'd come out hard",
  10. Eddie saying "we are racist at Colinwood",
  11. Brock saying, "I was only pulling your leg",
  12. Neeld saying, "I got it wrong",
  13. Toby saying "Matt and I are as tight as a Russian bodybuilder's quads",
  14. Any AFL footballer not answering a question in the next week beginning with 'yeah/nah',
  15. Gary Rohan being best on ground in a final,
  16. Goodwin saying "it was an error of judgement to trade with Norf for Jackson and Pickett",
  17. Fyfe, Bailey Smith and Natanui getting proper haircuts,
  18. Papley buying some shorts that actually fit,
  19. Razor Ray not imposing himself on a game in 2022,
  20. Gryan Miers changing his name by deed poll,
  21. Mitch McGovern saying "here's a $500,000 refund",
  22. Tom Hawkins pipped at the post for the 2023 Oscar for Best Actor,
  23. The AFL saying, "we go it wrong with the Giants and GCS", and finally,
  24. The Deez are no chance in 2002.

I don’t think such a number even exists.

6 minutes ago, Darkhorse72 said:

I really enjoyed being at Subi for this game Round 22, 2000

 

West Coast  5.1   8.3  10.6 15.10 100

Melbourne  4.4  13.5  19.9 26.14 170

 

S.Woewodin… 2 votes.

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Mazer Rackham said:

Not stationary. Nowhere in the rules does it say "stationary", nor has it ever.

Regardless, why are blatant throws that are throws in anyone's language not called?

I don't know about the technicalities but having a stationary arm was what was taught in juniors (in my day)

It didn't have to be completely rigid but that arm certainly couldn't be moving about

Now, the momentum of the ball is often governed by the hand holding the ball ... I'm baffled as to why these rules are always 'stretched'

For instance, for decades a player was required to kick the ball over the mark ... that's no longer the case either.  There are numerous other examples of how the game has been redesigned

The coaches try it on and the league lets them do what they like (in a general sense)

 

7 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

If only there was some branch or arm of the AFL that was responsible for enforcing the rules in the AFL comp. Perhaps we could encourage them to look into these matters.

I suspect those overseeing proceedings prefer to see the umpires continuing to cop the wrath

Because that's what happens.  They (the umpires) are at the coalface and it's just easier to blame them

In a way it's an ideal solution for those who are supposedly running the sport because it's just more of the same for the umps anyway.  They are so used to all the criticism's that it's probably just water off a duck's back

But that has never made it right in my eyes because we rarely get satisfactory solutions

Every year is like groundhog day

3 hours ago, Webber said:

24 free kicks to 10. Not surprising of course. That’s standard for the Dogs. Being logical and impartial, given that this is a repeating phenomenon, there can be only two explanations for it. 1. That the umpires are heavily predisposed to pay more frees to the Dogs than their opposition for reasons other than being deserved, or at least ‘equally deserved’ , or 2. that the Dogs are just spectacularly good at drawing fairly adjudicated frees, the obvious implication being that they train to create this. Can there be any other explanations, because it’s gone way beyond random? Way, waaaaay beyond. 

well put. It’s so obvious now it’s genuinely embarrassing for the AFL … or it should be.  That the dogs must train for it is clearly obvious now. while I hate it I can’t help but feel if it’s allowed then maybe we should too? they’ve literally hit another player on the ground when yr plus 14 or 15 kicks. 

But there’s more to it as well isnt there… as you pointed out. It doesn’t explain why so many frees are missed to opposition teams v the dogs. Its like the umps WANT to give the dogs free kicks. 2 blatant mark infringement 50’s against Weightman let go, 2 really iffy “ unrealistic attempts” given to them. It’s spoiling the game. 

Blues Not looking as potent out of the middle with a team defensive style of opposition. 
 

The hype on Dockers and comparing to the Dees turnover game is a bit premature.


Cerra looks like quite a decent player 

 

8 minutes ago, Jontee said:

Do Freo have any fwds?

To be fair, their forward line and defence isn’t exactly A-grade. If the midfield puts in a poor one, it exposes both ends off the ground.

Another poor quality game. the fare this weekend has been pretty ordinary

8 minutes ago, The Swimming Dee said:

That Carlton jumper is an embarrassment

Of course it is. It's a Carlton jumper. 


2 hours ago, dl4e said:

West Coast look like a 2nd division side of the vfa from the seventies. Dreadful.

Sunshine  just before they folded

Edited by Old Bear

3 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

I am not watching. 
Are either of these sides a threat?

Yes. Freo play a similar game to us. 

3 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

I am not watching. 
Are either of these sides a threat?

No threat…back to doing whatever you were doing jaded. Nothing to see here

 
3 hours ago, Webber said:

I heard a stat some weeks ago (wish I’d paid more attention) that teams who lose the grand final by more than 45 points don’t win a final the next year. Something like 70% don’t make finals at all. And the bigger the margin, the worse it gets (sample group gets smaller though). Ergo, Dogs won’t make finals, and if they do manage to scrape in, they’re going straight out. 

Yeah the stats show that usually a top 4 side from the previous year misses finals

RDT_20220423_2024427458141518414769606.thumb.jpg.13b335c393158d51f6b1f3265bf578df.jpg

 

Edited by The Lobster Effect


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • FEATURE: 1925

    A hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the “Fuchsias.” They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 08

    Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 148 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 563 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Richmond

    The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Richmond

    The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland