Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted

Meh … how many times have we won practice matches in February/March and gotten excited about the year ahead? I’ll wait for the real thing to start before passing any judgment on where we’re headed in 2022.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 7

Posted (edited)

We seem to like bending teams over barrels these days.

Great to watch.

May the strangle hold over Norf continue. 🙏

Edited by YesitwasaWin4theAges
  • Like 5
  • Love 1


Posted
1 minute ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Was there any noticeable difference in the umpiring of the holding the ball rule? Alternatively, were players trying to dispose of the ball more quickly because of the supposed "tightening up" of that rule? 

Didn't see any difference, other than a few ridiculous holding the balls paid.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Just put a pineapple on BB for the Coleman. Paying $21!

That will come down.

I reckon after today it will be in around $10-12 range.

  • Like 1
Posted

On the claim that Weid might have been played in the ruck in case that Luke Jackson leaves.

No because he needs to get a go away from just being a forward   in one position. And he is quite decent around the ground with good skills marking and handball ing. No one not even BBB or Tmac  can make  a difference to Dogga in the ruck.
Please no reason to  be so half glass empty that is not what is being suggested that Dogga is leaving this season or the next 2 at least. 

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Go Dees!! said:

How has Tom Sparrow done?

It looked like he had hit the gym regularly in the off season.

He was great. Trimmed down noticeably but still looks wide and strong. Kicked it beautifully and will get more midfield minutes based on today's game

  • Like 3

Posted
6 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Just put a pineapple on BB for the Coleman. Paying $21!

I was confused about the pineapple reference there for a minute.😁

I know a 20s a lobster.

Is a100 a watermelon ?

Worth a punt for sure.

  • Haha 2
Posted

On Brown, I saw a highlight video of Chandler's goal from the middle of the field. Was that Brown sprinting into the goalsquare chasing after it?

If so...seems a far bit faster/more agile than last year?

  • Like 3

Posted
5 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

On Brown, I saw a highlight video of Chandler's goal from the middle of the field. Was that Brown sprinting into the goalsquare chasing after it?

If so...seems a far bit faster/more agile than last year?

Yea it was. He looked quick and gave the thumbs up when it went through.

  • Like 1

Posted
15 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Was there any noticeable difference in the umpiring of the holding the ball rule? Alternatively, were players trying to dispose of the ball more quickly because of the supposed "tightening up" of that rule? 

A few iffy ones, but lots of high tackles paid that looked very dubious and "drawn".  Unfortunately Kayo wasn't doing replays. I would have liked some more looks at many of them.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Whats everyones thoughts on Chandlers game?

I rate the kid but obviously didnt get to see how he played today.

Any thoughts? 

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, S_T said:

BoG for me was Clarry.  Very powerful display.

Most pleasing was Joel Smith.  Not sure if he was beaten once and disposed of the ball very well.  Really starting to use his supreme athletic gifts well.  Even with Petty out, picking our defenders for round 1 will be a nightmare.

Can you elaborate on Joel Smith.?  Iv'e always had my doubts and saw a 30 sec clip of the game where he charged through won the ball then butched it.

Not representative of his game?  Hitting targets?

Posted (edited)

Chandler was opportunistic , at best.

Kicked 2 goals but was rarely sighted otherwise, though the same could be said for our other small forwards who tended to see more goals sailing over their heads from long distances

Edited by joeboy
  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...