Jump to content

Featured Replies

Would be shocked if we delisted him.

At worse just offer him a 1 year deal.

McDonald is pretty much cooked imo. Weideman certainly has an opportunity next year to cement that spot next to Brown.

 

No way he isn’t on an AFL list next year.

He might not be have ever fully cemented himself, but he’s too good for the scrap heap

 

 

Tbh a 2 year deal wouldn’t be a bad option. 
I doubt it would cost us a lot in $$$ but gives him time and us coverage worst.

 

Wasn’t his manager shopping him for a ridiculous price last year/early this year?

That backfired 


2 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

If we can’t get anything decent for him, then keep him. He’s decent depth at worst and won’t command a big salary. Still has potential at 24 to develop further and play an important role in future seeing as our other KPFs are all nearing the end of their careers.

Based on his output this year, he is not decent depth at all.

He was putid almost every time he set foot on the ground this year.

I would rather play a bunch of midgets than give him another chance

Well if Weiderman wasn't offered a new contract by us, would Mitch Brown possibly get another 1 year deal as insurance should someone get injured next season? 

 
4 minutes ago, wizardinoz said:

Well if Weiderman wasn't offered a new contract by us, would Mitch Brown possibly get another 1 year deal as insurance should someone get injured next season? 

I actually have more trust in Brown than Weideman to perform a role but still would like Sam to get a contract with us next year

There will be interest in the Weid too good a player. Collingwood, North, Essendon and Freo for starters would be interested in him.


I’m sure there is interest but perhaps not at the terms desired. He should stay for two years and reach FA and give himself a chance to push out TMac or BBB.

If nobody offers anything for him worthwhile, and if there aren’t really many clubs interested I think we could do worse than offer him a 2 year deal at close to bottom dollar with performance based incentives. 

He has a bit of a Miller like feel about him, show plenty early and have a purple patch that makes him look like a future star but never seem to find that click into the next level on a consistent basis. 

Personally I say keep him, none of our current key forwards are spring chickens. 

I would have liked him to be mentored by May.

He needs to learn how to compete and to be physical. I have always believed that Weid would make a good CHB. Petty looks a chance to play FWD with his physicality.

It can't hurt to have multiple strings to your bow.

On 9/7/2021 at 10:20 PM, Redleg said:

Tom Mac, Hunt, Spargo, ANB, Viney, Brayshaw,Tomlinson, Fritsch, Harmes, JJ and Sparrow.

Question: Know what these 11 players have in common.

Answer: Plenty of the experts on DL wanted them gone over the last few years.

 

On 9/8/2021 at 7:27 AM, picket fence said:

God damn it who are these EXPERTS😇

Don't you own a mirror.


2 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Can we turn him ino a defender?

Behind May Lever Tomlinson Petty and maybe Turner?  

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Would be shocked if we delisted him.

At worse just offer him a 1 year deal.

McDonald is pretty much cooked imo. Weideman certainly has an opportunity next year to cement that spot next to Brown.

Tom is contributing more than his raw possessions stats show and I wouldn’t describe him as cooked  - that said Weid would be worth hanging on to, if mutually agreeable terms can be reached. 

The talent levels are spread thin throughout the league especially with regards to KPF's so Sam might get offered a 2 year deal elsewhere on ok money ($300k - $350k per year?)

If we let him go what do we get in return?  A pick in the mid to late 30's?

Otherwise we could keep him on a lower amount of around $225k - $275k.  Entering his 7th year, anything less than that is entering delist territory

I still believe what is holding him back is self confidence.  If he can overcome that he might be a player.  Needs more aggression & needs to learn how to play in front (even just to feed our small forwards as T-Mac often does)

 

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Would be shocked if we delisted him.

At worse just offer him a 1 year deal.

McDonald is pretty much cooked imo. Weideman certainly has an opportunity next year to cement that spot next to Brown.

Pretty much my thoughts Dazzle. Our preferred forward structure includes two KPFs plus Jacko & Fritta. Given our 2 current keys forwards are approaching veteran status, we would be mad to punt the Weed as we have no other young KPF on the list. If one of BBB or TMac go down, at the very least Weed can fill a role.

Weid has rucked in the VFL and got a fair bit of ball around the ground.

Who do we have after Max and LJ to ruck?

Not saying he is a ruckman but he can pinch hit there and after BB and Tom who are the next key forwards?

IMO he stays unless we have someone to replace him with.

Edited by Redleg

2 hours ago, monoccular said:

Behind May Lever Tomlinson Petty and maybe Turner?  

Tom is contributing more than his raw possessions stats show and I wouldn’t describe him as cooked  - that said Weid would be worth hanging on to, if mutually agreeable terms can be reached. 

He just looked cooked to me. Since he's back injury he looks he's got concrete boots on and can barely break out in a gallop.

Just remember at the start of the pre season both Brown and Weideman were the preferred forward options over McDonald. 

In fact they definitely did prefer him as they initially were training McDonald up to be a wingman. Wasn't until both went down with injuries that this opened up the spot for him.

If Weideman stays and is able to get through the summer unscathed and injury free then I think they'll prefer trial the Weideman and Brown combo.

Problem with Weideman is that he's a man who's lost complete confidence in himself. I would trust a Mark Williams to assist him in regaining that confidence back.

Edited by dazzledavey36


I'd imagine Weid gets offered a contract no matter what, and Mitch Brown goes off the list, and Gunston hopefully signs on

14 minutes ago, Dwight Schrute said:

I'd imagine Weid gets offered a contract no matter what, and Mitch Brown goes off the list, and Gunston hopefully signs on

I reckon if we get Gunston and then target a backup (mature) ruck, Weid is in big strife.

Tmac had 9 kicks, 5 marks, 5 hand passes, 11 contested possessions. Kicked a goal. Eh average game, fair nuff.

But Weidman has had better stats than this in all of 2 of his 49 games.  We're looking at apples v oranges here imo. 

If Tomlinson comes back fit, id like to see Petty shifted to forward to replace Tmac eventually. Definitely a top 22 player who can take a grab and shown excellent contested work.  

 

 
2 minutes ago, Jjrogan said:

Tmac had 9 kicks, 5 marks, 5 hand passes, 11 contested possessions. Kicked a goal. Eh average game, fair nuff.

But Weidman has had better stats than this in all of 2 of his 49 games.  We're looking at apples v oranges here imo. 

If Tomlinson comes back fit, id like to see Petty shifted to forward to replace Tmac eventually. Definitely a top 22 player who can take a grab and shown excellent contested work.  

 

Geez he has been good in a key post down back though.

Looks to be a rare find. Would be difficult for them to move him when he has found his groove.

Tommo on the other hand was moved down back because he failed in the role we recruited him for.

1 hour ago, Dwight Schrute said:

I'd imagine Weid gets offered a contract no matter what, and Mitch Brown goes off the list, and Gunston hopefully signs on

I don't understand the Gunston move he only has 1 year left with his bad back. Why waste a player on the list? He's signed on at the Hawks until 2022 isn't he? I don't think he would get a game.

HF: NEAL - BULLEN, MCDONALD, PICKETT

F: SPARGO, B.BROWN, FRITSCH.

Their is no one he can replace he will spend his time in the 2's. Keep Weid if they think McDonald is cooked but I don't think he is cooked he's got a couple of years in him especially if that barracker not supporter dopey Dazzle thinks he's cooked then surely he has more years in him. Know nothing clown. Eventually Jackson can take over the CHF\ruck role if McDonald isn't up to it.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 199 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies