layzie 34,528 Posted June 29, 2022 Posted June 29, 2022 9 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said: You miss the point That little pesky club wouldn’t have made it into the 90’s without those 2 bought Flags in the 70’s Fitzroy had a much longer history I do wonder where North would be if they didn't break through for those flags in the 70s. Could they have had a tough time even surviving? 1 Quote
BAMF 4,479 Posted June 30, 2022 Posted June 30, 2022 On 6/29/2022 at 9:40 PM, monoccular said: Isn’t his (Gunston) body well and truly stuffed? He had a bulging dusk which wiped out his 2021. He had to have a second bout of surgery to fix it. Has come back in 2022 and played alright in a team which clearly values younger players more (Mitch Lewis looks the goods so you can't blame them). Had an ankle injury recently but has played 10 games so far this year. I'm not taking about him being a gun and paying him big bucks. I'm talking about replacing Mitch Brown. I would much rather be taking about a younger KPF, but I don't think we would be able to afford one in salary or trade. Quote
PaulRB 6,435 Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 I think we need to continue blooding our young draftees, give JVH games, draft another tall to develop to replace BBB/TMac, Gunston would clog the pipeline and add little during his time with us given his age, and the fact we now have many leaders with Premiership experience... Quote
Demon Disciple 12,529 Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 We have struggled many a time to keep the ball locked inside our forward 50 this year. Gunston would be a burden in improving this. Quote
640MD 3,564 Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 I would be disappointed if we took this route. Very short term benefit if at all, and only able to be recognised as good or bad after some years. Better to develop our own, younger and faster keep the pressure on the opposition and play “our football” types for the longer view . 2 Quote
Travy14 2,142 Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 On 6/28/2022 at 11:36 AM, rjay said: Gunston can play more than the Fritsch type role...I wish we had him on board this year as he would make our forward half so much more potent. Great player... He might be 1cm shorter but he is also 13kg lighter. He doesn't play Key fwd. I Love Gunston, but doesn't fit our fwd line 1 Quote
Travy14 2,142 Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 On 6/28/2022 at 11:25 AM, Lord Nev said: He's 1cm shorter than TMac. And 13kg lighter Quote
Lord Nev 13,512 Posted July 1, 2022 Posted July 1, 2022 19 minutes ago, Travy14 said: And 13kg lighter This year (averages): TMac - 4 marks, 1 contested mark, 1.7 goals, 1.1 tackles Gunston - 3.9 marks, 1 contested mark, 1.5 goals, 1.3 tackles And as far as the AFL's "key forward" rankings goes: 2 Quote
Travy14 2,142 Posted July 3, 2022 Posted July 3, 2022 On 7/1/2022 at 5:33 PM, Lord Nev said: This year (averages): TMac - 4 marks, 1 contested mark, 1.7 goals, 1.1 tackles Gunston - 3.9 marks, 1 contested mark, 1.5 goals, 1.3 tackles And as far as the AFL's "key forward" rankings goes: These are the same rankings that don't have Max Gawn as Elite. Also where is Fritsch's stats in this. Id say they are better in all but tackles. Quote
Lord Nev 13,512 Posted July 3, 2022 Posted July 3, 2022 2 hours ago, Travy14 said: These are the same rankings that don't have Max Gawn as Elite. Also where is Fritsch's stats in this. Id say they are better in all but tackles. Ok, but the point was actually to show he is a 'key forward' given some were arguing that point. Quote
Travy14 2,142 Posted July 5, 2022 Posted July 5, 2022 On 7/3/2022 at 8:37 PM, Lord Nev said: Ok, but the point was actually to show he is a 'key forward' given some were arguing that point. He isn't even a Key Fwd in his own team. He has had to play more of a key fwd since Roughead retired. But he is as much a key fwd as Jackson is. Just cos a website says he is key fwd, he lines up in a fwd pocket every week. 1 Quote
whatwhat say what 23,818 Posted July 5, 2022 Posted July 5, 2022 rip to his father, who died suddenly this morning legendary afl figure 1 Quote
old55 23,860 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 4 minutes ago, Lord Nev said: That dilutes their McStay FA compensation and hurts them with picks and points for Dunkley and the 2 F/S. 1 Quote
Bombay Airconditioning 6,504 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 I was hoping we’d go after him. 3 Quote
DeeSpencer 26,667 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 45 minutes ago, old55 said: That dilutes their McStay FA compensation and hurts them with picks and points for Dunkley and the 2 F/S. They might be able to get the McStay compo then work out a trade with Hawthorn. After the Hawks attempted fire sale last year they probably can’t stand in the way of Gunston going and at nearly 31 his own compo shouldn’t rate highly 1 Quote
Redleg 42,142 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 Good to see a team that beat us in the finals adding Dunkley, Gunston and Ashcroft, while we lose LJ and replace him with Grundy. 3 1 Quote
Demons11 7,135 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Redleg said: Good to see a team that beat us in the finals adding Dunkley, Gunston and Ashcroft, while we lose LJ and replace him with Grundy. 🙄 The trade week hasn’t even started and Grundy is a better player than Gunston and Dunkley Edited September 28, 2022 by Demons11 Quote
DeeSpencer 26,667 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 2 minutes ago, Redleg said: Good to see a team that beat us in the finals adding Dunkley, Gunston and Ashcroft, while we lose LJ and replace him with Grundy. yeah but they’ll start with a 6 goal handicap if they pick Daniher Quote
The Jackson FIX 3,499 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 Strange-ish decision. Could be chaos there for a little while Quote
dazzledavey36 56,274 Posted September 28, 2022 Author Posted September 28, 2022 Wow.. Out if all players you'd think would think the club be chasing Gunston hard it would be us.. Massive disappointment once again that we didn't throw our hat in the ring for a player that fits a significant need for us. This whole putting our eggs in the Grundy basket isn't that impressive one bit. 3 Quote
dazzledavey36 56,274 Posted September 28, 2022 Author Posted September 28, 2022 5 minutes ago, Demons11 said: 🙄 The trade week hasn’t even started and Grundy is a better player than Gunston and Dunkley Lol on current form? Nah. Grundy has huge question marks on his body and will be 29 at the start of the year. Doesn't even fit a significant need compared to what Gunston. 1 Quote
mo64 5,910 Posted September 28, 2022 Posted September 28, 2022 13 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said: Strange-ish decision. Could be chaos there for a little while Don't know why. Gunston is a smart footballer who could fit into any sides forward line. He's a better fit than McStay. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.