Jump to content

POSTGAME: Rd 07 vs North Melbourne

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

I feel like I’ve been to a wake yet we won by five goals. Whether that’s a good thing or not I haven’t yet worked out. ??‍♂️

  • Quote
    • Like 6
     
    5 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    I reckon a lot of us are almost willing that first loss for the season to happen. To get it outta the way. It’s a human thing. 

    The week after the grand final will suit me just fine

  • Quote
    • Love 1
    2 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

    I feel like I’ve been to a wake yet we won by five goals. Whether that’s a good thing or not I haven’t yet worked out. ??‍♂️

    Rab - this is what good teams do... play like $hite and then go on to win... it's a [censored] weird feeling eh.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
     

    I'm glad our really bad games are still wins these days.

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    A 30 point win in Round 1 will give a much higher % than a 30 point win in Round 22....

    Swyl a 3 point win in round 1 can give a better percentage than a 30 point win. Total for v total against.

  • Quote
    6 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

    Not fifteen...play on.

    Sheesh.

    play on a soon as you look laterally even though you haven't moved off the line of the mark!

  • Quote
    • Like 7
    2 minutes ago, ManDee said:

    Swyl a 3 point win in round 1 can give a better percentage than a 30 point win. Total for v total against.

    Yes i am aware of that. But the more games played, the higher the differential must be to keep a high %

  • Quote
    •  

    With hindsight even though this was top v bottom...North had a lot to play for.

    Gunning for tgeir first win.

    Their first game at their home away from home.

    Ben b against his old side.

    Our record at this ground.

    We were probably too relaxed.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    8 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Yes i am aware of that. But the more games played, the higher the differential must be to keep a high %

    No, if you maintain the same winning ratio the percentage is the same. One game 100 or 1000 the number of games is irrelevant. 

    Edited by ManDee
    The more games the harder it is to change the percentage by large amounts

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    5 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    But the more games played, the higher the differential must be to keep a high %

    Not necessarily, SWYL.  For example, if we go into round 20 with a percentage of 150 and win 60 points to 40, our percentage would remain at 150%.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    Ben Brown's thoughts on his debut (watch for a little cameo from Christian Petracca at the end there):

     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 10
    1 minute ago, ManDee said:

    No, if you maintain the same winning ratio the percentage is the same. One game 100 or 1000 the number of games is irrelevant. 

    % is points for and Points against

    it isn’t the amount of games won. 
     

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, demonstone said:

    Not necessarily, SWYL.  For example, if we go into round 20 with a percentage of 150 and win 60 points to 40, our percentage would remain at 150%.

    Yes correct. But if that happened in Round 2 it would be a larger differential 

  • Quote

    46 minutes ago, loges said:

    It seemed like the umpires were instructed to call no 15 and play on at every opportunity to keep the game moving.

    An effort to justify the call in the Swans/Geelong game last night?

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

    Can someone explain why we went down in percentage on the ladder??

    Yes, our for and against in today’s scores in percentage terms was less than our current percentage of 150, hence the adjustment 

  • Quote

    The game makes heaps more sense and then becomes a bit funnier if you imagine Brayshaw had a few cones in advance. Also ducked down to the changerooms for top-up in the last quarter. He and Jones managed to [censored] up just about every forward thrust they were involved in by being super-[censored] non-Matrix. Add ANB and Tomald in that. If Kozzie is near the ball, please just [censored] off. 

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    38 minutes ago, Chook said:

    Why do I feel so flat?

    Lots of uncertainty about our backline all of a sudden, and Brown didn't fit all that well into our forward line if I'm honest.

    Cause we play crap in the first half. Looked like Melb of old. 
     

    Give BB more time chooks it was his first game. It will click. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, MF-C said:

    Tmac into the backline

    Bring in Weed 

    Get Baker out and bring in Sparrow 

    I wouldn't mind seeing Bedford in too 

    Bedford in for Melksham as well.

    Feel for Tomlinson. Quite worried for Viney too. I wonder if his game time might have to be managed for the rest of this season.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    3 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Yes correct. But if that happened in Round 2 it would be a larger differential 

    open a spreadsheet and start running the numbers SWYL. As long as the margin is a consistent 150% points scored for or against doesn't matter.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    8 minutes ago, ManDee said:

    No, if you maintain the same winning ratio the percentage is the same. One game 100 or 1000 the number of games is irrelevant. 

     

    7 minutes ago, demonstone said:

    Not necessarily, SWYL.  For example, if we go into round 20 with a percentage of 150 and win 60 points to 40, our percentage would remain at 150%.

    It's alright. Let it go. When it comes to Knights of the Order of Australia, SWYL is your man. Percentages. not so much.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    7 minutes ago, Nasher said:

    Mate, you’re embarrassing yourself. Double check the your maths before you post.

    I hate to be the one to break this, but no, he isn't.

  • Quote
    •  

    First half massive concern...that our players can still come to a game with that level of intensity is baffling. Thought we'd learned and were past it. Our intensity was so bad that not only were we walking around the stoppages but North were almost walking out of them.

    Some guys had absolute shockers. Was Brayshaw trying to get tackled by executing as slowly as he possibly could when he had the ball today?

  • Quote
    15 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    % is points for and Points against

    it isn’t the amount of games won. 
     

    Read first, comprehend second, consider third and respond last. I understand percentage, I think you may be confused, perhaps go to step one and start again.

    Edited by ManDee
    I said 1 game 100 or 1000 doesn't matter

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Carlton

      I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Carlton

      The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: St. Kilda

      The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 172 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Carlton

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 37 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Carlton

      Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 23 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Carlton

      A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 365 replies
      Demonland
    View All