St Kilda reek of Melbourne 2019.

Pre season injuries, lack of hunger, bath water etc...

As much as Id like to see West Coast lose as they are in the finals every farkin season Id love to see the Sainrts get smashed.  They fluked a finals spot in last years clown covid hub circus. 

If I played against St Kilda I reckon I’d give the ball to Zak Jones on purpose. 

46 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

St Kilda reek of Melbourne 2019.

Pre season injuries, lack of hunger, bath water etc...

Probably preseason injuries... 

Not a crack at you @Bring-Back-Powell, and jeeze I hate 'bathwater' as a catch-all phrase for, getting a head of yourself.

No team... ever drinks their own bathwater... you don't think all coaches drill in to the players that they haven't achieved anything until they've won a premiership... (or the players don't understand this through all their coaching and know it innately?)

Their gameplan has been torn to shreds... and they're quite a limited team...as evidenced by losing to us last year...

I think we ripped the Heart out of the Saints during the 2nd Quarter in Round 2. 

I think we missed an opportunity to really touch up the saints. 

33 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

I think we missed an opportunity to really touch up the saints. 

I think it was us, who killed them

4 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I think it was us, who killed them

I'd prefer them to have a long slow painful death. 

I am just going to go ahead and say it

West Coast easily won the Chris Judd/Josh Kennedy trade.  

While i like what the 'stand' rule has brought to the game between the arcs, the AFL really needs to fix it's application to the set shots for goal.

There is sometimes strict interpretation and at other times none in terms of stepping off the line of the mark while taking a shot.

Some players are getting called immediately taking a step or two as they arc out of their line, while others appear invisible to the umpire and are alowed to arc out and waltz towards the side of the man standing the mark without any adjudication.  With the latter (non-governance) gaining an extra 5 meters or more, sometimes the difference between a goal and falling a little short.

A fundamental but obvious umpiring flaw that needs to be addressed and quickly.  Could be the difference in a tight game.

@Rusty Nails, dont you get it mate ? - ambiguity is great for the game. It's great for debate, it frustrates people endlessly.

Silence = apathy = death.

 

Switched on Triple M for a few minutes and heard BT calling someone Jay Z over and over.....  switched that [censored] off quick smart.

Saints with a good fight back.

Here come the Aints

Max King is what we hoped Weid would be

So apparently no Hurn = no Eagles. They’ve been a disaster down back.

33 points up and Eagles decided to go to Tullamarine. Haven’t seen them stop like this in a while.

well

that ended quickly

West Coast are just down hill skiers. Apply the pressure and they wilt

Great response from the Saints after the Essendon horror show

OK.   What the hell was in the saints bath water then?

A win like this could reinvigorate their season. Very disappointing. 

2 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

A win like this could reinvigorate their season. Very disappointing. 

Anyone that embarrasses WC like that is alright in my book

5 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Meth Coke losing to the Aints

That would be a HUGE upset. 
i can’t see it, but wait and see....

Mate you should have taken the $4.70

Applying some Demonland logic here but if we beat the saints easily, the saints then beat West Coast doesn’t that mean….......we’ve gone past West Coast ?

Can you imagine the King brothers in the 1 side!  That would be impressive to see.

 

 

8 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

A win like this could reinvigorate their season. Very disappointing. 

Better to have both on 2-2. Win tomorrow and we will be 2 games clear of both.