Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

IMO, because of the way this season has and is unfolding, no Premiership Flag should be awarded.

Teams that should have had softer draws have lost them.

Games have been abandoned.

Some matches are suggested to be against depleted sides.

Teams being forced to play extra games during the week, affecting those games and the following ones.

This is a joke of a football season, that of course is out of the AFL's control, as they just need the money for games on TV.

So no flag to the winner, unless of course it is Melbourne and then it should count as three Premiership Flags because of the difficulties we faced.

 

TV would not pay for a season without the usual finals and this year is all about the TV money and of course distracting the plebs from asking for a refund

There have been compromised seasons in the past (VFL) that awarded a flag. 

 
  • Author
4 minutes ago, Ham said:

There have been compromised seasons in the past (VFL) that awarded a flag. 

Not like this one is turning out to be.

Just now, Redleg said:

Not like this one is turning out to be.

True, but I still think they will award a flag.


  • Author
7 minutes ago, Ham said:

True, but I still think they will award a flag.

You might like the new AFL rule brought in today then.

If any team in the GF is outed due to virus positive tests, then the team in the AFL that has never played in a GF will play the remaining team and will be given a 12 goal start, to even up for the fact that they had to fly in from the GC.

Sounds a fair rule to me.

Edited by Redleg

There will be a flag, and because we won't win it we can hang [censored] on whoever does.

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Not like this one is turning out to be.

WWI says hi.

 

An earlier post said in jest what if a GF team test positive in the week before the Granny? Well it could happen and based on todays rules as long as a club has 22 players and emergencies they play. Essendon stand to lose their entire back 6 as it stands. MFC were training in groups as well the 7 mids, 7 backs as are other clubs. The GF would be a real drawcard with half a team out.

I’d say that it will be informally written off as not a real flag, but for key rights stakeholders it will need to officially remain a premiership season for reasons mostly financial. 


The season has been bastardised, manipulated and truncated so much that it could never be considered a legitimate premiership in the eyes of most fans at least until it’s forgotten in a few decades. Will be known as the COVID Cup. Won’t be worth much bragging rights unless backed up with a real premiership when things get back to normal.

Edited by america de cali

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

IMO, because of the way this season has and is unfolding, no Premiership Flag should be awarded.

Teams that should have had softer draws have lost them.

Games have been abandoned.

Some matches are suggested to be against depleted sides.

Teams being forced to play extra games during the week, affecting those games and the following ones.

This is a joke of a football season, that of course is out of the AFL's control, as they just need the money for games on TV.

So no flag to the winner, unless of course it is Melbourne and then it should count as three Premiership Flags because of the difficulties we faced.

You mean like our 3 peat in 1939-41?

If you take the premiership away clubs have nothing to play for. And sadly the competition won’t survive financially if we don’t have a season this year, no matter how compromised. 

3 minutes ago, america de cali said:

The season has been bastardised, manipulated and truncated so much that it could never be considered a legitimate premiership in the eyes of most fans. Will be forever known as the COVID Cup. Won’t be worth much bragging rights unless backed up with a real premiership when things get back to normal.

I remember when the Spurs won the 99 NBA Championship, a season cut short by player lockout. Only a 60 game season I think. There was an asterix next to it for a long while until the Spurs won again I think 6 years later. Ultimately became one of the best teams of this century so far. 

I'd go all out for this year's flag, and use it as a launching pad to a strong decade. I mentioned in another thread that I can see one of Richmond Collingwood West Coat and GWS falling down and missing finals this year, may well end up being 2-3 of them.

This year's flag is up for the taking. It may well be the easiest AND hardest flag you could win.

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

Not like this one is turning out to be.

The world war years, both of them? 
 

For mine the more I think about it, once it is consigned to history and past our generation, no one really cares. Like no one talks about the hardships of the 1923 season and granny. There is history but I’ve never had a conversation relating to extraordinary circumstances in an AFL season. I feel like we spend to much time worrying about the right now when it really doesn’t mean anything if you know what I mean. 

Edited by Cards13


Said it before but my preference was to have a break until about July/August and then have some kind of off-shoot Ansett/Wizard/Nab Cup style tournament that could have any kind of round robin format they can think of that would last a couple of months and give people something to watch along with giving players match practice. I think it could have been a good chance to brand it as something else and differentiate itself from the usual premiership cup and they could have finished it around the regular time of year without having to go deep into the racing calendar.

But go on AFL, keep trying to raise this premiership season from the dead.

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

IMO, because of the way this season has and is unfolding, no Premiership Flag should be awarded.

Teams that should have had softer draws have lost them.

Games have been abandoned.

Some matches are suggested to be against depleted sides.

Teams being forced to play extra games during the week, affecting those games and the following ones.

This is a joke of a football season, that of course is out of the AFL's control, as they just need the money for games on TV.

So no flag to the winner, unless of course it is Melbourne and then it should count as three Premiership Flags because of the difficulties we faced.

Which game has been abandoned?

So we don’t get to play a depleted Bummer side where others from next week onwards may.   We will no doubt be rescheduled midweek after their ‘rested’ players return and we have had a hard weekend.  
Once again we are screwed by the Bummers and the AFL looking after them. 

Edited by monoccular

Totally agree the integrity of the competition is indeed questionable with what’s occurred in particular the teams in interstate hubs who have been affected and not sure how a premiership winners would be worthy. Unfortunately $$$ are driving the comp, but I wouldn’t enjoy or happy if the Demons won. 
 

4 hours ago, Redleg said:

Not like this one is turning out to be.

1916 Fitzroy won the spoon and the flag in a 4 team competition.


Seriously what a bunch of negative nellies D/L has providing posts.

like in life nothing was meant to be easy that's with fighting for.

Hss anyone questioned the war years and flags then?

Last time  I checked flags counted as the same as in non war years and the Clubs didn't discriminate nor due the record books.

It is what it is!

HAve the attitude that we play any where any time and give everything because some  Clubs  may not And should care  if you win it whatever happens.

Afterwards don't devalue or Discriminate  the Effort of the eventual premier!!!  
 

Oh and please don't bore the pages of social media with post after post of hard  luck stories of inequality and Favouritism or chances lost due to fate!

 

 

6 minutes ago, 58er said:

Seriously what a bunch of negative nellies D/L has providing posts.

like in life nothing was meant to be easy that's with fighting for.

Hss anyone questioned the war years and flags then?

Last time  I checked flags counted as the same as in non war years and the Clubs didn't discriminate nor due the record books.

It is what it is!

HAve the attitude that we play any where any time and give everything because some  Clubs  may not And should care  if you win it whatever happens.

Afterwards don't devalue or Discriminate  the Effort of the eventual premier!!!  
 

Oh and please don't bore the pages of social media with post after post of hard  luck stories of inequality and Favouritism or chances lost due to fate!

 

 

Yeap, couple of hours ago, post 15. 

Yeah the war years were rough but was anyone here around for them?

It is absolutely true that there have been compromised seasons but let's not pretend we're comparing apples and apples. Pre draft, pre salary cap, pre equalization, pre professional game list goes on.

Edited by layzie

 
  • Author
3 hours ago, loges said:

Which game has been abandoned?

In its current format, our game today.

It will be replaced in a timeslot that impacts us both for that game and the following one, you can be sure.

Also the team make up will be different and again I am sure we won't get the benefit of a depleted Bombers side like Carlton and other teams might.

I am not whingeing, merely stating that this is such a compromised season as to be treated differently in the AFL records.

If people disagree that is their right and if they say we just follow the rules, then what would they say if the season was abandoned next week and the AFL said that the team on top of the ladder is the Premier.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 173 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies