Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, Fanatique Demon said:

The aim was to hear others' opinions on whether we really have a decent list. If we can't find players on our list who'd get a game in the top teams, what hope do we have?

As for already answering my own question, no, I don't think just Max and Clarrie would make the other teams.

Now, I'm trying to put this politely...  Maybe it's not so much a case of answering my own question as someone else not understanding its intent. 

Interesting topic, 

IMO you can pick more than 4 to fit into the top 4 teams as there would  not be a permanent 15 or so players in each of the top 4 sides.

However I can pick one to fit into the Ricmond team, and  replace the retiring A Rance    and that is OMAC. We can ask for a future first. 

 

 

Like all teams the rating of individuals within our squad entirely depends on how successful we are as a team. CD had us as the collective #1 rated squad heading into 2019. At the end of the day, that is why these rating systems are flawed, the measures of data don't extend beyond what happens during that 120 minutes on game day. I think when in form we have at least 12-15 players that would walk into the best 22 of the teams you've mentioned. That's the key, form. 

 

I'm all for off-season musings, but this is a bit of an outdated and simplistic way of analyzing lists I reckon. 

Even very good sides typically only have a handful of superstars and maybe another half dozen clearly above-average players. The bottom 6-10 players in good teams aren't world beaters, but play a role that utilizes their strengths and doesn't expose their weaknesses.

In that sense, most of Melbourne's best 22 would at least be in the frame of Richmond's best 22.

Oliver is probably a better player than, say, Cotchin, but would replacing Cotchin with Oliver improve Richmond? Doubt it.

Our list is good enough on paper to go deep in finals. Pretty much anyone that knows footy accepts this. Getting it to click is the hard part.

On topic:

Gawn 

Oliver

May (GC version)

Tmac (2018 version)

 


Angus Brayshaw finished third in 2018 Brownlow. Back to his best, he’s elite. 

If we take the position that our players are in good form then the following players will get a go at all 4 prelim clubs.

Max

Oliver

May

Brayshaw

Lever

Viney

Tmac.

 

6 hours ago, Webber said:

Angus Brayshaw finished third in 2018 Brownlow. Back to his best, he’s elite. 

The prospect of having to hear for the rest of his life that he finished 3rd in the Brownlow one year, should be a sufficient motivating force to get back to his best and surpass that crowning achievement. ?

Edited by John Demonic

 

1 Clarry 

2 Max

3 May

4 Melksham

5 Harmes

6 Nev

Not as much love for Fritta in this thread as I would have expected.  Come the end of 2020, that will change!


21 hours ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

Melksham would be in the starting 18 of any of those teams.

As would plenty of our orher guys.

And yet some people around here wouldn’t even have him in our best 22.

Would walk into anyone’s best 22 with his crisp kicking and goal kicking nous.

Players that would feature in other best 22’s.

Gawn - obviously.

Melksham - as mentioned above.

May - one of the better full backs in the league.

T Mac - 50 odd goals despite missing the first 5 games of the year gets you a gig.

Oliver - one of the best young mids in the game. Does things others can’t.

Maybe:

Brayshaw - 25 odd Brownlow votes gets you a gig but I’m hoping he’s not going to live off that  achievement for the rest of his career. Very good midfielder who once had a 37 possession 3 goal game. Poor 2019.

Salem - has a good shoe but tends to fade late in seasons.

Lever - A former All Aust 40 squad member who’s an excellent interceptor of the pill. Hasn’t shown anything near elite in his time with us.

Fritsch - This season will prove whether he’s the real deal as a full time fwd presumably. Needs to kick 40 to be considered a gig with the big boys. Apparently Richmond and Collingwood have kept an eye on him if your believe rumours.

Petracca - Has elite traits but just goes missing after playing a blinding quarter. Will 2019 be his year?

Jordan will be in our top 4 by the end of the year and walk into any other midfield.

 

We made the prelim last year and now have a better and more mature list. 

We have the talent we need a fit list, a solid game plan, fully committed players and mental toughness though the squad 

20 hours ago, picket fence said:

1 Clarry 

2 Max

3 May

4 Melksham

5 Harmes

6 Nev

I am surprised that you didn’t pick (sic) Pickett? ?

5 hours ago, CBDees said:

I am surprised that you didn’t pick (sic) Pickett? ?

Next year


Gawn, Oliver, May, Harmes

We also need at least 4 of these guy's to move up with our top tiers Melksham, Fritta, Tracc, Gus & Jack, Langdon, TMac

Plus at least two of our youngsters to force their way into the top 22 and everyone else to play to their maximum capacity, then who knows what they could achieve.

 

Most our our best 22 would, when injury-free and in form, fully deserve a place in a top-4 team's best 22 unless they were jammed behind a better player in their specific position.

Most our our best 22 would, when injured and/or out of form, fully deserve a place in a bottom-4 team's best 22.

 

 

 

 

 

On 12/22/2019 at 7:49 AM, Wrecker45 said:

Jordan will be in our top 4 by the end of the year and walk into any other midfield.

 

 

James Jordon?         More chance of him being delisted at the end of the year than being one of our top 4 players.

1 minute ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

 

James Jordon?         More chance of him being delisted at the end of the year than being one of our top 4 players.

What do you base this on and why would you make the comment?

Just now, Baghdad Bob said:

What do you base this on and why would you make the comment?

Base it on common sense.

Made the comment  to show how absurd it is to say he will be one of our top 4 players by the end of the season.


55 minutes ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

Base it on common sense.

Made the comment  to show how absurd it is to say he will be one of our top 4 players by the end of the season.

Good thinking...reply to what you perceive as an absurd comment with one even more absurd comment.

23 minutes ago, rjay said:

Good thinking...reply to what you perceive as an absurd comment with one even more absurd comment.

Its not really absurd to suggest a player who hasn't even played a senior game, might be delisted at the end of his second season. It does happen. It certainly happens more often than a second year player shooting to top 4 status after not getting a senior game in his first year.

42 minutes ago, rjay said:

Good thinking...reply to what you perceive as an absurd comment with one even more absurd comment.

What did I say that was absurd?

 
20 minutes ago, KingDingAling said:

Its not really absurd to suggest a player who hasn't even played a senior game, might be delisted at the end of his second season. It does happen. It certainly happens more often than a second year player shooting to top 4 status after not getting a senior game in his first year.

Exactly King.

And while that is true, I wasnt even saying he would be delisted.    Was just saying theres more chance of it happening than him being one of our best 4 players.

Clearly too much for Rjay and Baghdad to wrap their heads around.

Edited by JakovichScissorKick

20 minutes ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

Exactly King.

And while that is true, I wasnt even saying he would be delisted.    Was just saying theres more chance of it happening than him being one of our best 4 players.

Clearly too much for Rjay and Baghdad to wrap their heads around.

Everybody can wrap their heads around what was in fact, in my opinion, a stupid post

This whole thread is asking for opinion, I think Jordon will develop into a very very good player, top 4 this year, maybe not, delisted absolutely not

We have a very talented list, whether they would get a game in another team, I really don't care, as it is just an exercise in opinion

I just want the talent to be on display consistently this year


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 187 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies