Jump to content

The Splitting of Pick 8

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

20 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

Give Taylor a ring and ask him if we are and why.

If you end up getting a hold of him, I’d love to know as well. 

Cheers

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    Looking forward to seeing the melts occur from the [censored] on here when we select Jackson.

  • Quote

    You all realise if we don't bid on Green the AFL will investigate the draft tampering and we will get caught because the people who did do a deal are weak and will confess to save their skins, Dean Bailey and Chris Connolly.

  • Quote
    •  
    2 minutes ago, durango said:

    You all realise if we don't bid on Green the AFL will investigate the draft tampering and we will get caught because the people who did do a deal are weak and will confess to save their skins, Dean Bailey and Chris Connolly.

    Poor comment on a deceased person 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
    6 hours ago, Red and Blue realist said:

    I see this as a real draft day decision, I think we'll take Jackson at pick 3 and then will see how the rest of the draft order shapes up to see if we split 8 or not. There's a chance Young or Serong are available at 8 and I think we'd take them, but if both are gone, then I think we'd looking at trying to get access to Weightman, Pickett or Taylor. 

    Yeah agree with more or less all of that. I’m now of the opinion we will take Jackson at 3 and weight and see who’s available at 8 before pulling trigger on possible split. It will also depend who we are doing split with I guess as well. If Young is gone but still 3/4 players we rate highly like Kemp, Weightman,Serong or Stephens then we might be tempted to do a deal with Freo as we know some of those players will still be there at 10. 

  • Quote

    13 minutes ago, durango said:

    <rubbish>

    What the goddamn hell?

  • Quote

    Just saw Jay Clarks phantom draft and he is absolutely convinced we will be trading pick 8 but didn't go into to which team.

    and is equally convinced we'd be picking Luke Jackson at pick 3

  • Quote
    11 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

    Just saw Jay Clarks phantom draft and he is absolutely convinced we will be trading pick 8 but didn't go into to which team.

    and is equally convinced we'd be picking Luke Jackson at pick 3

    Ruckman as very early draft picks are scary...and mixed. Josh Fraser, mishandled by Malthouse and failed to meet expectations. Jeff White, fantastic until rule changes limited his impact. Any others?

  • Quote
    •  

    If we split pick 8 and one of those become a pick in teh 20's then its a bad move. We hole all teh aces, pick 8 should become Geelong's 14 & 17 at the very least. we dont give up a first round selection next year not to give it up easily again. 

    It appear Jackson is going at P3 which i dont agree on, not saying he wont be a good player, but its a draft that we surely pick players for needs basis, like Young a skilled HBF that will release players. Time will tell.

  • Quote

    There is a list of ruckmen picked early in the draft like Richard Lounder, Billy Longer and Stephen Hooper who were failures because they were tall players who were playing against midgets.

    When the MFC recuited Gawn at 34 and Fitzpatrick in the 50's the recruiter thought Fitzpatrick was the better footballer.

    I have watched and worked for this club (10 Years) for the last 66 years and the recruiter have always shot themselves in the foot by falling in love with a footballer for one reason or another.

    I talked and worked for Ray Jordan who had a good theory that any footballer who does not have enough mongrel in their makeup are not worth pursuing as a player. 

    Edited by durango

  • Quote
    • Thanks 2

    1 hour ago, pitmaster said:

    Ruckman as very early draft picks are scary...and mixed. Josh Fraser, mishandled by Malthouse and failed to meet expectations. Jeff White, fantastic until rule changes limited his impact. Any others?

    Brodie Grundy was a first round pick, granted he slid down the order further than was expected. 

    Ben McEvoy was also from memory. 

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, pitmaster said:

    Ruckman as very early draft picks are scary...and mixed. Josh Fraser, mishandled by Malthouse and failed to meet expectations. Jeff White, fantastic until rule changes limited his impact. Any others?

    Nic Natanui goes alright.

  • Quote

    Mongrel, yes! Jack watts was an amazing footballer but lacked mongrel. Does Jackson have mongrel

  • Quote
    10 minutes ago, Dirts said:

    Mongrel, yes! Jack watts was an amazing footballer but lacked mongrel. Does Jackson have mongrel

    Yes

  • Quote
    27 minutes ago, Dirts said:

    Mongrel, yes! Jack watts was an amazing footballer but lacked mongrel. Does Jackson have mongrel

    Yep

  • Quote

    2 hours ago, durango said:

    There is a list of ruckmen picked early in the draft like Richard Lounder, Billy Longer and Stephen Hooper who were failures because they were tall players who were playing against midgets.

    When the MFC recuited Gawn at 34 and Fitzpatrick in the 50's the recruiter thought Fitzpatrick was the better footballer.

    I have watched and worked for this club (10 Years) for the last 66 years and the recruiter have always shot themselves in the foot by falling in love with a footballer for one reason or another.

    I talked and worked for Ray Jordan who had a good theory that any footballer who does not have enough mongrel in their makeup are not worth pursuing as a player. 

    this. Competitiveness goes a loooong way. as they need to improve and adjust as they go. Calrksons speech for Lewis when he retired was telling. Lewis was valuable for the team as a competitor. He was the go to man as third man up at the ruck contest. then they changed the rule. He was execellent at impacting the contest slinding low into packs. then they changed the rule. Yet he found a way to be valuable and played 300 games. Was not quick, great reader of play, started as a poor kick too, but was very observant on the field and thought about the game. the ultimate competitor. 

     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Good, Jackson at 3, then  use 8 on what we need. Nic Nat was a pick 2 and we missed that one. turned out ok. 

    If we get to pick 8 and we see opportunity perhaps pick the extra player by grabbing 14 and 17 etc. 

    I still think we traded well and our team is solid. An easy draw and a fit team. Looks good!

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    On 11/20/2019 at 10:28 AM, Kent said:

    Remind me again why we are allegedly chasing Jackson ?

    Coz he can't kick.... Fits right in with many of our current list!!

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Sad 1

    Kicked 9.4 at in Colts this year, so he must hack them through with a lot of fortune!

    Edited by Axis of Bob

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1

    3 hours ago, Demon3 said:

    If we split pick 8 and one of those become a pick in teh 20's then its a bad move. We hole all teh aces, pick 8 should become Geelong's 14 & 17 at the very least. we dont give up a first round selection next year not to give it up easily again. 

    It appear Jackson is going at P3 which i dont agree on, not saying he wont be a good player, but its a draft that we surely pick players for needs basis, like Young a skilled HBF that will release players. Time will tell.

    There's an increasing chance that Young gets through to 8, so I hope we don't make a decision to split until draft day, but with clubs rankings of players and more knowledge of where players might go, it looks like picks in the 20's will be handy as there may be a few (generally) highly rated kids slipping through.

    If we get to 8 and Young and Ash are off the board, I'm comfortable splitting as we are a good chance of getting similar types a bit later on as well getting a small forward. What this draft pool does have is a number of half-back options and small forwards!

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    I can definitely see us pulling a surprise and taking a kid like Bergman or Rantall at 12, if the split goes ahead.

    Can't see us being interested in McAsey however.

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, pitmaster said:

    Ruckman as very early draft picks are scary...and mixed. Josh Fraser, mishandled by Malthouse and failed to meet expectations. Jeff White, fantastic until rule changes limited his impact. Any others?

    Mathew Kruzer and Nic Nat

  • Quote
    •  

    Hoping to split pick 8 into 10+22.

    Take Young/Jackson at 3. We could then use 10 to grab whoever is left out of Kemp, Serong, Stephens, Ash etc. 22 can then be used on a small forward such as Weightman, Taylor or Pickett.

    A combination of those 3 players being added to the list would be a great draft period for us.

    Add Langdon, Tomlinson and Bennell, and it's a good off-season!

  • Quote
    • Like 7

    Good, Jackson at 3, then  use 8 on what we need. Nic Nat was a pick 2 and we missed that one. turned out ok. 

    If we get to pick 8 and we see opportunity perhaps pick the extra player by grabbing 14 and 17 etc. 

    I still think we traded well and our team is solid.

    Would love Jackson and Young at 3 and 8  though

    Image result for kramer oh yeah meme

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • GAMEDAY: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

      It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road for their 3rd interstate game in 4 weeks as they face a fit and firing Crows at Adelaide Oval. With finals now out of our grasps what are you hoping from the Dees today?

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 61 replies
      Demonland

    • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

      What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Gold Coast

      From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Gold Coast

      Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

      With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 213 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

      The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

        • Haha
      • 231 replies
      Demonland
    View All