Axis of Bob 11,945 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 15 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said: The only thing I can think of here is that Sydney don’t want to encourage teams to make high bids on academy picks given they have a few coming next year. Or, Occam's razor says that it is probably because they don't rate him as the best player at pick 5. Likely not even the best player of his type. 1 Quote
billyblanks35 33 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 He'll grow another 5cm on a KFC diet. Couple of preseasons and he'll be a beast. Quote
DeeSpencer 26,675 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 11 minutes ago, Axis of Bob said: Or, Occam's razor says that it is probably because they don't rate him as the best player at pick 5. Likely not even the best player of his type. Then they kind of tricked GWS to trade up with Adelaide, which also tipped the Giants hand that they were getting ahead of a bid. Seems incredibly low risk for the Swans to bid. Surely Freo bid just to keep them honest. GWS aren’t taking picks 40, 59 and 60, they are using them to match! 1 Quote
Garbo 1,567 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 Not sure y we are so into this kid, under sized ruck by modern standards and not shown enough as a key fwd IMO and those are speculative enough as is with high picks, surely we need a player like Hayden Young more, hard to see any return on this kid inside the next 4 years 1 Quote
Ron Burgundy 8,588 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 5 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said: My mate, who goes for Fremantle, has been keeping a close eye on Jackson, this is what he had to say: “If Melbourne pick up Luke Jackson at pick 3 it will be an absolute prize... he is Josh Kennedy esk in the air and Nic Nat on the ground and probably Patty Ryder in the ruck... if you haven’t watched his highlights tape, you should... he is full of talent and will dominate the comp for the next decade” A bit over the top or does anyone share his views? Obviously I hope he’s spot on. Will he still be available at pick 3?! 1 2 Quote
rjay 25,424 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 34 minutes ago, Garbo said: Not sure y we are so into this kid, under sized ruck by modern standards and not shown enough as a key fwd IMO and those are speculative enough as is with high picks, surely we need a player like Hayden Young more, hard to see any return on this kid inside the next 4 years Looks like he could be an oversized mid... 1 Quote
monoccular 17,760 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 On 11/25/2019 at 7:07 PM, Skuit said: Yes, it does seem like Taylor is a bit of a basketball fan. I think I heard somewhere that Pendlebury used to play b'ball as well. Well, maybe if they don’t work out, we could start a MFC Basketball team lead by Bradke and Jackson ? 3 Quote
John Demonic 5,988 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, monoccular said: Well, maybe if they don’t work out, we could start a MFC Basketball team lead by Bradke and Jackson ? I can't believe Jason Taylor drafted Austin Bradtke instead of Ben Simmons 2 Quote
Males 578 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, John Demonic said: I can't believe Jason Taylor drafted Austin Bradtke instead of Ben Simmons We wanted the little bit extra Salary cap space ? 1 Quote
Ethan Tremblay 31,388 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 50 minutes ago, Ron Burgundy said: Will he still be available at pick 3?! Well......have a read of post #47 in the ‘Nearest the Pin’ thread and you’ll find the answer you seek. 1 Quote
the fork 357 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 I’m off work at the moment so watched almost the entire AFL Draft telecast via the app. Cal Twomey said that he had asked a number of recruiters who they’d take at three and he said the majority did not hesitate to say Jackson. I know this fact won’t sway the Demonland experts but seriously cannot wait to giggle at the reaction on here to Jackson’s name being called at Pick 3. 6 1 2 Quote
JakovichScissorKick 771 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, the fork said: I know this fact won’t sway the Demonland experts but seriously cannot wait to giggle at the reaction on here to Jackson’s name being called at Pick 3. I have questioned the possible Jackson pick, as have many others. If we take him, I will still be very excited. He will be a Demon player, thats all that matters. Also I have been wanting the club for years to bring in some X factor and flair, and they are doing that. Its great. Edited November 26, 2019 by JakovichScissorKick 8 Quote
rjay 25,424 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 7 minutes ago, the fork said: I’m off work at the moment so watched almost the entire AFL Draft telecast via the app. Cal Twomey said that he had asked a number of recruiters who they’d take at three and he said the majority did not hesitate to say Jackson. I know this fact won’t sway the Demonland experts but seriously cannot wait to giggle at the reaction on here to Jackson’s name being called at Pick 3. ...and they all would have taken Scully at 1 ahead of Martin at 3. Let's hope we get the right one at 3. 6 Quote
Paulo 285 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 6 hours ago, Older demon said: The latest draft predictor from the Adelaide journo's has us taking Jackson at 3 and no bid on Green. Tactically GWS take Ash at 4 and Sydney make a bid for Green which GWS match so Green goes at 5. Sydney then get pick 6(Flanders) Adelaide have 7 (McAsey) Freo 8 ( Robertson a W.A. boy) Freo have next pick 8 (Stephens) Carlton bid for Henry at 10 which Freo match. That means Freo get picks 8,9,& 10 wow. At 11 Carlton may go for Serong leaving MFC with pick 12 and in this mock draft Young is still there and so is Picket. Young might slide to 28, that would be great 1 jackson 10 pickett 28 young 1 Quote
leucopogon 1,519 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 Go home factor is impossible to ignore. It's going to be a big risk taking Jackson. I think he'll be good but Perth is just so different to Melbourne. Hope the club has interviewed the bejeesus out of him to make sure he's not a flight risk. 1 1 Quote
Paulo 285 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 If young and taylor were both there at 28 i think we take taylor at this pick, we need goal kickers not hb flankers 1 1 Quote
Its Time for Another 4,306 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 1 hour ago, the fork said: I know this fact won’t sway the Demonland experts but seriously cannot wait to giggle at the reaction on here to Jackson’s name being called at Pick 3. Seriously hope you’ll still be giggling in 4 years time and we’re all very happy campers. 1 Quote
ben russell 764 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 38 minutes ago, Paulo said: Young might slide to 28, that would be great 1 jackson 10 pickett 28 young Absolutely no chance that Young will be available at pick 28. He will be picked in the first round without a doubt. Quote
DeeSpencer 26,675 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 1 hour ago, leucopogon said: Go home factor is impossible to ignore. It's going to be a big risk taking Jackson. I think he'll be good but Perth is just so different to Melbourne. Hope the club has interviewed the bejeesus out of him to make sure he's not a flight risk. Maybe we need to rethink the way we acclimatise Jackson to Melbourne. The current plan seems to be boarding with a caring host family then quickly in to a share house with team mates in a nice inner city suburb with lots of things to see and do. We might be better off just dumping him in a dilapidated house in Cranbourne (near to Casey) or even better Frankston (right by the beach) with a few meth addicted neighbours and plenty of bogan in the air. Buy him a jetski and he won't even know the difference (until June). 3 4 1 Quote
DubDee 26,674 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 A ruckman at pick 3. I still can’t believe it. Lets hope he can develop into a fwd 3 Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 Thinking he might be a Giants player come tomorrow and we will have another Green in the red and blue. 3 Quote
John Demonic 5,988 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 53 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said: Thinking he might be a Giants player come tomorrow and we will have another Green in the red and blue. And then we'll trade Gus for Hogan next year Quote
La Dee-vina Comedia 17,137 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 8 hours ago, leucopogon said: Go home factor is impossible to ignore. It's going to be a big risk taking Jackson. I think he'll be good but Perth is just so different to Melbourne. Hope the club has interviewed the bejeesus out of him to make sure he's not a flight risk. I don't particularly like comparing players with chattels and I hope he doesn't want to leave, but if he's a good player and wants to go home, he's still a valuable asset. It's not like he would go home leaving us with nothing in return. 1 Quote
Demon17 5,262 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 20 hours ago, one_demon said: A few years and he'll want to go home to Perth I Agree. Why has there been very little on the go home factor especially to WA. The processes now mean contracts are worthless if someone wants to leave compared to the old days. The kid might spend a year at Casey and wonder ' what the hell'. I can see 5 - 6 years of a Jesse Hogan type angst each off season. Be warned . 1 Quote
dazzledavey36 56,332 Posted November 26, 2019 Posted November 26, 2019 7 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said: Thinking he might be a Giants player come tomorrow and we will have another Green in the red and blue. Word is we won't be bidding on Green because we are set on Jackson. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.