Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Jones - was embarrassingly inept

Viney - rarely found teammates 

Gawn - dominated the centre

Oliver - many meaningless possessions 

Brayshaw - same as Oliver 

Melksham - showed some composure 

Stretch - a momentum killer

Salem - steady and skilled

Harmes - showed little sparkle 

Hore - still learning craft

Lewis - painful to watch

Neal-Bullen - not a forward 

McDonald - looked more comfortable 

Frost - 3 excellent quarters

Fritsch - no second efforts

Smith - just a plodder

Garlett - failed to impress 

Petracca - disappointing yet again

Hibberd - impressive new role

Lockhart - was rarely sighted

Weideman - inept and unsighted

Hunt - not a forward 

Edited by Grapeviney

 
 

Weideman     Plays like Oscar

7 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Jones - was embarrassingly inept

Viney - rarely found teammates 

Gawn - dominated the centre

Oliver - many meaningless possessions 

Brayshaw - same as Oliver 

Melksham - showed some composure 

Stretch - a momentum killer

Salem - steady and skilled

Harmes - showed little sparkle 

Hore - still learning craft

Lewis - painful to watch

Neal-Bullen - not a forward 

McDonald - looked more comfortable 

Frost - 3 excellent quarters

Fritsch - no second efforts

Smith - just a plodder

Garlett - failed to impress 

Petracca - disappointing yet again

Hibberd - impressive new role

Lockhart - was rarely sighted

Weideman - inept and unsighted

Hunt - not a forward 

Very generous, competed ok in the air but still gave away a stupid free kick to a wingman 10 meters out on a high ball. Fumbled everything.

Hunt is not a footballer. He’s an athlete but not a footballer. 

 

Lewis - Cornes was right.

Stretch - a good game 

Hore - shows some promise

Hibberd - seriously poor disposal

Hunt - didn’t show up

weid - a lazy player

2 minutes ago, deegirl said:

Hunt is not a footballer. He’s an athlete but not a footballer. 

Agree. No ability to judge the footy. Needs to go back to Casey. 


Dees Goooooonee 2019!

Lewis - Keep your feet

Seriously, that's the first sign the game has passed you by.

It's time mate, get out now while you can...the only redemption is looking back on a great career.

You just don't have it to redeem yourself on the field any more...


2 minutes ago, DemonHauntedWorld said:

Weideman - deserves Zimbabwean dollars 

Or Monopoly money. 

4 minutes ago, goodwindees said:

Greatly undervalued Stretch & Hore and greatly overrated Tom MacDonald. 

Give it up you people. Any one of you played any decent footy?. That ball was coming into Tigers forward line at a million miles an hour and the backs had no hope however battled hard and it could have been a lot worse of a loss without the likes of TMac  who did well along with Frost,Salem and Hore . The forwards and Mids let them down AGAIN big time.

Viney - Learn team footy

Time & again Jack gets in the way of teammates &/or kicks blindly when he should have given off to a player in a better position.

He does my head in. Cost us both their goals in the 3rd...

3 minutes ago, rjay said:

Viney - Learn team footy

Time & again Jack gets in the way of teammates &/or kicks blindly when he should have given off to a player in a better position.

He does my head in. Cost us both their goals in the 3rd...

Remember when we were really horrible (circa 2013) N.Jones was guilty of the same things?

 

They dont trust their their teammates to execute & try to take on too much. 


23 minutes ago, joeboy said:

Jones - was embarrassingly inept

Viney - rarely found teammates 

Gawn - dominated the centre

Oliver - many meaningless possessions 

Brayshaw - same as Oliver 

Melksham - showed some composure 

Stretch - a momentum killer

Salem - steady and skilled

Harmes - showed little sparkle 

Hore - still learning craft

Lewis - painful to watch

Neal-Bullen - not a forward 

McDonald - looked more comfortable 

Frost - 3 excellent quarters

Fritsch - no second efforts

Smith - just a plodder

Garlett - failed to impress 

Petracca - disappointing yet again

Hibberd - impressive new role

Lockhart - was rarely sighted

Weideman - inept and unsighted

Hunt - not a forward 

Hibbo - Overdue new role

Lockhart - Persist persist persist

Smith - Persist persist persist

Frost - Proving simpletons wrong

Lewis - Hawthorn Farewell Game

ANB - Good before injury

Viney - He is human

Garlett - Caused perceived pressure

Petracca - ignore the doubters

Hore - Like his courage

Stretch - Maybe another week

Oliver/Brayshaw - Still carrying side

Gawn - Earning his money

Weed - Needs more intensity

Melksham - Connected with Gawn

Salem - Graceful not deadly

Jones - Time to adjust

Goody - weeks too late

Harmes - Better last week

 

 

54 minutes ago, joeboy said:

 

Frost - 3 excellent quarters

WTF? He hasn't had 3 good quarters for the season, let alone this game. Frost had been the beneficiary of the omac hate on here, but seriously the guy has no football IQ, looks lost whenever the ball is not directly in front of him, and turns out over horribly at least a few times a game. All while just doing a specific job, not playing a zone like the rest of the defenders. 

33 minutes ago, deegirl said:

Remember when we were really horrible (circa 2013) N.Jones was guilty of the same things?

 

They dont trust their their teammates to execute & try to take on too much. 

No they are both just average players with one attribute and that is agression/hardness.

 

Harsh on T.Mac kept Lynch to 1 goal. I thought he was good.

6 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Harsh on T.Mac kept Lynch to 1 goal. I thought he was good.

Was horribly fumbly though. Think he cost at least 2 in the first qtr. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 39 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 259 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies