Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

What a rubbish article. Was it originally published in Women’s Weekly? 

 

 

There was news on Andrew Brayshaw and Hogan on SEN; a few weeks ago. A Jurno from WA said that a swap between Brayshaw and Hogan was spoken about, that he heard. So it might be Brayshaw for Hogan + a pick?

I’d accept brayshaw and their first rounder for hogan. 

 
Just now, deebug said:

There was news on Andrew Brayshaw and Hogan on SEN; a few weeks ago. A Jurno from WA said that a swap between Brayshaw and Hogan was spoken about, that he heard. So it might be Brayshaw for Hogan + a pick?

Brayshaw worth more than Hogan ? I don't think so

5 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

And you're welcome to be sucked in by it.

 

Don't worry Wise, it's all click bait and a lot of other publications and journalists just realized they missed the story and are playing catch up.

Still in denial?  I like your positivity usually but it's got to be delivered with some sensible recognition of the situation.  You're a bit poor on that lately.


Lose Hogan, gain pick. Pick to WC + JKH + Tyson for Gaff in sign and Trade. Win win lol AND we pipe Norf. Would be Buddy-esque in its snubbery.

 

7 minutes ago, DavidNeitz9 said:

Brayshaw worth more than Hogan ? I don't think so

That's not what was proposed. Read it again. If Hogan is worth two first round picks, it goes without saying that a top 2 pick + a player taken at top 2 LAST YEAR is effectively the same.

 
1 minute ago, praha said:

Lose Hogan, gain pick. Pick to WC + JKH + Tyson for Gaff in sign and Trade. Win win lol AND we pipe Norf. Would be Buddy-esque in its snubbery.

 

Gaff only requires money ... as the lady says... please explain

In the same way we were left exposed when Lever went down, who comes in as key forward if we trade Hogan and one of Weid or TMac go down?

Trading Hogan still feels ridiculous to me.


2 minutes ago, praha said:

Lose Hogan, gain pick. Pick to WC + JKH + Tyson for Gaff in sign and Trade. Win win lol AND we pipe Norf. Would be Buddy-esque in its snubbery.

 

Since when does Gaff need to be traded for @praha?

Ideally, 

Hogan--> Freo

Neale ---> Brisbane

Picks 4,5 to Melbourne

Gaff to Melbourne

Preuss to Melbourne

May to Melbourne

5 to GC

4 to GWS

Whitfield to Melbourne

Just now, Diamond_Jim said:

Gaff only requires money ... as the lady says... please explain

One need not have logic in Demonland trade proposals, James.

Don't understand the obsession of Brayshaw, I'm assuming its because of Angus but isn't Andrew more of what we already have? I don't watch many Freo games so I don't know, also Ed Langdon turns it over a bit doesn't he?

There is a lot of talk about us paying two first round picks for Lever, however that is a very narrow snapshot on a small part of the deal. The deal involved other picks (including a second rounder to us). 10 + 16 + 68 out, 37 + 43 + Lever in.

If you do the sums with the points then it was effectively a single pick 7 for Lever. 

Ironically (correct usage) Adelaide knocked back or initial offer of 10 and 29, which would have equated to pick 4. Effectively 'caving into Adelaide's demands' got us 2 second rounders in exchange for dropping our 2019 first rounder 13 spots and bringing it forward a year.

Brayshaw and Cerra and we give them a pic back next year .


2 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Since when does Gaff need to be traded for @praha?

Ideally, 

Hogan--> Freo

Neale ---> Brisbane

Picks 4,5 to Melbourne

Gaff to Melbourne

Preuss to Melbourne

May to Melbourne

5 to GC

4 to GWS

Whitfield to Melbourne

You would need to add our first rounder from next year AT LEAST to get Whitfield.

I would do that without hesitation

1 minute ago, Axis of Bob said:

There is a lot of talk about us paying two first round picks for Lever, however that is a very narrow snapshot on a small part of the deal. The deal involved other picks (including a second rounder to us). 10 + 16 + 68 out, 37 + 43 + Lever in.

If you do the sums with the points then it was effectively a single pick 7 for Lever. 

Ironically (correct usage) Adelaide knocked back or initial offer of 10 and 29, which would have equated to pick 4. Effectively 'caving into Adelaide's demands' got us 2 second rounders in exchange for dropping our 2019 first rounder 13 spots and bringing it forward a year.

Hogan is worth more than Lever, He is 23 and was on track for 60 goals this year if he played every game. Not to mention he pushed into the midfield and regularly collected 20-25 touches, he's a generational player. Lever is good, but Hogan is something else. We should get much more than pick 7

3 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Since when does Gaff need to be traded for @praha?

Ideally, 

Hogan--> Freo

Neale ---> Brisbane

Picks 4,5 to Melbourne

Gaff to Melbourne

Preuss to Melbourne

May to Melbourne

5 to GC

4 to GWS

Whitfield to Melbourne

So we have enough money for one big fish + the 800k or whatever a year Hogan is on available. How do we fit May, Gaff, Preuss and Whitfield into that space? Gaff will want a min of 800k himself and then May would be 600k+. Are we paying Preuss and Whitfield in high fives and IOU notes.

1 minute ago, ding said:

You would need to add our first rounder from next year AT LEAST to get Whitfield.

I would do that without hesitation

With Shiel leaving, GWS wont be squeezed for money. It would be hard to pry whitfeild out before free-agency.

2 minutes ago, CityDee said:

Brayshaw and Cerra and we give them a pic back next year .

With Neale leaving Fremantle won’t trade out any of their young guns. 


7 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Since when does Gaff need to be traded for @praha?

Ideally, 

Hogan--> Freo

Neale ---> Brisbane

Picks 4,5 to Melbourne

Gaff to Melbourne

Preuss to Melbourne

May to Melbourne

5 to GC

4 to GWS

Whitfield to Melbourne

Lovely post.

Just now, Ethan Tremblay said:

With Neale leaving Fremantle won’t trade out any of their young guns. 

Freo doesn't have the chips here.

1 minute ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

With Neale leaving Fremantle won’t trade out any of their young guns. 

No deal then 

 
2 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

So we have enough money for one big fish + the 800k or whatever a year Hogan is on available. How do we fit May, Gaff, Preuss and Whitfield into that space? Gaff will want a min of 800k himself and then May would be 600k+. Are we paying Preuss and Whitfield in high fives and IOU notes.

Vouchers and food coupons

Whatever happens things just got very interesting.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 221 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies