Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Look at their "ins" for next season.Even if May comes over he will still wishing he was training down the road 

Posted
34 minutes ago, DubDee said:

How the [censored] do the hawks keep bending over the comp?! Mitchell for 14, Scully for 40. 

Its like there is different rules for them

Hawks must be taking on his last years salary.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 9/20/2018 at 7:12 PM, CityDee said:

Yeah nah . Didnt he lie to Big Jim ?

pass . 

Pass him by - not up to our standards.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Actually wouldn't be mad. I mean, don't get me wrong, not pushing for it to happen at all but there's certainly a role for him on the wing.

The price that the hawks are rumored to get him at too... 

Edited by DTJ
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Win4theAges said:

Hawks must be taking on his last years salary.

he won't be going for a pay cut but his $1M a year deal ran out a few years back. I would expect he's somewhere round the 500-600K mark. Not much more than we would have been paying Tyson.

Just cannot believe the lack of interest in him generally.

Hawks have offered a 4 year deal which seems reasonable and he's passed a medical.

Posted
2 hours ago, IRW said:

They go to the Hawks because they are a succesful club with facilities rather than a public park for a training oval

you been to waverly lately?

Posted

The real question is, do we have enough room in the cap to employ his father as well..?

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Haha 5
Posted
1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

you been to waverly lately?

Nah the myki I use to get to Hoddle St doesnt go out that far

Posted
1 hour ago, trout said:

Have you checked out there Dingley project? 

that's years off. what's your point?

and if waverley is so good (as implied by op) why dingley?

i can't see hwfua touring dingley any time soon - lol

Posted

The thought of $cully back in red & blue makes me spew in my mouth a little bit.

BUT, if the going rate is a 40+ pick, and hes not Hawthorn or nothing, then I'd hope we are at least having a look.

I think...

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Angry 1
Posted
On 10/13/2018 at 6:09 PM, trout said:

Have you checked out there Dingley project? 

you think that might be Tommy's tipping point ??

Posted
On 10/12/2018 at 1:32 PM, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I'd be delighted if he came back and played on a wing. He would be massive step from Tyson, Jones and JFK who are as slow as slugs.

Who cares what happened in 2011. Build a bridge and get over it.

I believe JFK took a slug which made him slow.

It would be highly doubtful he will get up for next season considering the scope of his injury. Very few have come back from that.

Posted
1 hour ago, JTR said:

The thought of $cully back in red & blue makes me spew in my mouth a little bit.

If that does, do big Max proud and direct it at some unsuspecting punter.

Posted

The tought of Hawthorn picking him up for as low as pick 53 is making me spew.  Kane Corns and Tim Watson are also suggesting that the AFL shold get involved and investigate/ interven should he go for that little.  Fat chance of that happening, the AFL do nothing in these situations, just look at Luke Ball - Collingwood and Chris Judd to Carlton.

Still it suprises me that the likes of St Kilda, Carlton, North and the Doggies are not into Scully and surely those players would have better trade material than pick 53 to offer GWS in return.

 Equalisation is completely broken if there was ever such a thing in the first place.

  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

The tought of Hawthorn picking him up for as low as pick 53 is making me spew.  Kane Corns and Tim Watson are also suggesting that the AFL shold get involved and investigate/ interven should he go for that little.  Fat chance of that happening, the AFL do nothing in these situations, just look at Luke Ball - Collingwood and Chris Judd to Carlton.

Still it suprises me that the likes of St Kilda, Carlton, North and the Doggies are not into Scully and surely those players would have better trade material than pick 53 to offer GWS in return.

 Equalisation is completely broken if there was ever such a thing in the first place.

Agree it's a bargain but remember that GWS are agreeing to it. While Scully is not entitled to say I will only go to Hawthorn he is entitled to reject being traded to a named club. Same as what Hogan has done to us with Freo.

Obviously the Giants modelled their salary cap on a flag in 2017 and 2018. Understandable if you think about it. Now they have to do something drastic.

Heard on the radio yesterday that Collingwood might be a chance for Patton. If so makes the decision to trade Lobb even more puzzling.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...